Probative Norms for Multimodal Visual Arguments

被引:28
作者
Blair, J. Anthony [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Windsor, Ctr Res Reasoning Argumentat & Rhetor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
关键词
Visual argument; Multimodal argument; Probative criteria and standards; Argument evaluation; Rhetorical stimulus; Transparent and opaque rhetorical stimulus;
D O I
10.1007/s10503-014-9333-3
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The question, "What norms are appropriate for the evaluation of the probative merits of visual arguments?" underlies the investigation of this paper. The notions of argument and of multimodal visual argument employed in the study are explained. Then four multimodal visual arguments are analyzed and their probative merits assessed. It turns out to be possible to judge these qualities using the same criteria that apply to verbally expressed arguments. Since the sample is small and not claimed to be representative, this finding can at best be regarded as suggestive for the probative assessment of multimodal visual arguments in general.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 233
页数:17
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], INSIDE ARGUMENTS LOG
  • [2] [Anonymous], PRACTICAL STUDY OFF
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, P 10 OSSA C ARG
  • [4] Blair J.A., 2012, Groundwork in the theory of Argumentation: selected papers of J. Anthony Blair, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4
  • [5] Blair J.A., 1996, ARGUMENT ADVOCACY, V33, P23
  • [6] Finocchiaro Maurice A, 2013, METAARGUMENTATION
  • [7] Gilbert MichaelA., 1997, COALESCENT ARGUMENTA
  • [8] Groarke Leo., 1996, Informal Logic, V18, P105, DOI [10.22329/il.v18i2.2376, DOI 10.22329/IL.V18I2.2376]
  • [9] Hitchcock D, 2013, INFORMAL LOG, V33, P195
  • [10] Hume David., 1973, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR