Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

被引:52
作者
Dyke, Katherine [1 ]
Kim, Soyoung [1 ]
Jackson, Georgina M. [2 ]
Jackson, Stephen R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Psychol, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, Div Psychiat, Sch Med, Nottingham NG7 2TU, England
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); Motor cortex; Cortical excitability; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; PAIRED ASSOCIATIVE STIMULATION; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; EXCITABILITY; TDCS; MODULATION; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.052
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a popular non-invasive brain stimulation technique that has been shown to influence cortical excitability. While polarity specific effects have often been reported, this is not always the case, and variability in both the magnitude and direction of the effects have been observed. Objective/hypothesis: We aimed to explore the consistency and reliability of the effects of tDCS by investigating changes in cortical excitability across multiple testing sessions in the same individuals. A within subjects design was used to investigate the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS applied to the motor cortex. Four experimental sessions were tested for each polarity in addition to two sham sessions. Methods: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to measure cortical excitability (TMS recruitment curves). Changes in excitability were measured by comparing baseline measures and those taken immediately following 20 minutes of 2 mA stimulation or sham stimulation. Results: Anodal tDCS significantly increased cortical excitability at a group level, whereas cathodal tDCS failed to have any significant effects. The sham condition also failed to show any significant changes. Analysis of intra-subject responses to anodal stimulation across four sessions suggest that the amount of change in excitability across sessions was only weakly associated, and was found to have poor reliability across sessions (ICC = 0.276). The effects of cathodal stimulation show even poorer reliability across sessions (ICC = 0.137). In contrast ICC analysis for the two sessions of sham stimulation reflect a moderate level of reliability (ICC = .424). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that although 2 mA anodal tDCS is effective at increasing cortical excitability at group level, the effects are unreliable across repeated testing sessions within individual participants. Our results suggest that 2 mA cathodal tDCS does not significantly alter cortical excitability immediately following stimulation and that there is poor reliability of the effect within the same individual across different testing sessions. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 825
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans
    Batsikadze, G.
    Moliadze, V.
    Paulus, W.
    Kuo, M. -F.
    Nitsche, M. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2013, 591 (07): : 1987 - 2000
  • [2] Computational Models of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Bikson, Marom
    Rahman, Asif
    Datta, Abhishek
    [J]. CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 43 (03) : 176 - 183
  • [3] Chen R, 2000, MUSCLE NERVE, pS26
  • [4] Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities
    Chew, Taariq
    Ho, Kerrie-Anne
    Loo, Colleen K.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (06) : 1130 - 1137
  • [5] Datta Abhishek, 2012, Front Psychiatry, V3, P91, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00091
  • [6] Modulation of corticospinal excitability by paired associative stimulation: Reproducibility of effects and intraindividual reliability
    Fratello, Fabiana
    Veniero, Domenica
    Curcio, Giuseppe
    Ferrara, Michele
    Marzano, Cristina
    Moroni, Fabio
    Pellicciari, Maria Concetta
    Bertini, Mario
    Rossini, Paolo Maria
    De Gennaro, Luigi
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (12) : 2667 - 2674
  • [7] Delayed plastic responses to anodal tDCS in older adults
    Fujiyama, Hakuei
    Hyde, Jane
    Hinder, Mark R.
    Kim, Seok-Jin
    McCormack, Graeme H.
    Vickers, James C.
    Summers, Jeffery J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 6
  • [8] Transcranial magnetic stimulation: A primer
    Hallett, Mark
    [J]. NEURON, 2007, 55 (02) : 187 - 199
  • [9] The Role of Interneuron Networks in Driving Human Motor Cortical Plasticity
    Hamada, Masashi
    Murase, Nagako
    Hasan, Alkomiet
    Balaratnam, Michelle
    Rothwelll, John C.
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2013, 23 (07) : 1593 - 1605
  • [10] Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions
    Horvath, Jared Cooney
    Vogrin, Simon J.
    Carter, Olivia
    Cook, Mark J.
    Forte, Jason D.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2016, 234 (09) : 2629 - 2642