That's what task sets are for: shielding against irrelevant information

被引:80
作者
Dreisbach, Gesine [1 ]
Haider, Hilde [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Psychol 1, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Cologne, Germany
来源
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG | 2008年 / 72卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00426-007-0131-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Goal-directed behavior requires the cognitive system to distinguish between relevant and irrelevant information. The authors show that task sets help to shield the system from irrelevant information. Participants had to respond to eight different colored word stimuli under different instruction conditions. They either had to learn the stimulus-response mappings (SR condition), to use one task set (1 TS condition) or to use two different task sets (2 TS condition). In the 2 TS and the SR conditions, participants showed response repetition effects (interaction of color repetition x response repetition), indicating that participants processed the color of the words. Importantly, the 1 TS condition did not show such an interaction. Overall, the results provide evidence for the shielding function of task sets. This benefit turns into costs in classical task switching paradigms. From this perspective, switch costs can be interpreted as the consequence of successful shielding on the previous task.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 361
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ALLPORT A, 1994, ATTENTION PERFORM, V15, P421
[2]  
ALLPORT A, 2000, ATTENTION SPACE ACTI
[3]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[4]   Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cuing task [J].
Ansorge, U ;
Neumann, O .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2005, 31 (04) :762-777
[5]   REPETITION EFFECTS WITH CATEGORIZABLE STIMULUS AND RESPONSE SETS [J].
CAMPBELL, KC ;
PROCTOR, RW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1993, 19 (06) :1345-1362
[6]   The role of working memory in visual selective attention [J].
de Fockert, JW ;
Rees, G ;
Frith, CD ;
Lavie, N .
SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5509) :1803-1806
[7]   Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: Evidence from the use of probability cues [J].
Dreisbach, G ;
Haider, H ;
Kluwe, RH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2002, 28 (03) :468-483
[8]   The role of task rules and stimulus-response mappings in the task switching paradigm [J].
Dreisbach, Gesine ;
Goschke, Thomas ;
Haider, Hilde .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2007, 71 (04) :383-392
[9]   Implicit task sets in task switching? [J].
Dreisbach, Gesine ;
Goschke, Thomas ;
Haider, Hilde .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2006, 32 (06) :1221-1233
[10]   Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm [J].
Dreisbach, Gesine ;
Haider, Hilde .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2006, 13 (02) :334-338