Reconciling biodiversity conservation and flood risk reduction: The new strategy for freshwater protected areas

被引:8
作者
Akasaka, Takumi [1 ]
Mori, Terutaka [2 ]
Ishiyama, Nobuo [3 ,11 ]
Takekawa, Yuya [4 ]
Kawamoto, Tomonori [5 ]
Inoue, Mikio [6 ]
Mitsuhashi, Hiromune [7 ]
Kawaguchi, Yoichi [4 ]
Ichiyanagi, Hidetaka [8 ]
Onikura, Norio [5 ]
Miyake, Yo [6 ]
Katano, Izumi [9 ]
Akasaka, Munemitsu [10 ]
Nakamura, Futoshi [3 ]
机构
[1] Obihiro Univ Agr & Vet Med, Lab Conservat Ecol, Obihiro, Hokkaido 0808555, Japan
[2] Publ Works Res Inst, Aqua Restorat Res Ctr, Kakamigahara, Japan
[3] Hokkaido Univ, Grad Sch Agr, Dept Forest Sci, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[4] Tokushima Univ, Grad Sch Technol Ind & Social Sci, Tokushima, Japan
[5] Kyushu Univ, Fishery Res Lab, Tsuyazaki, Fukutsu, Japan
[6] Ehime Univ, Grad Sch Sci & Engn, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
[7] Museum Nat & Human Act, Sanda, Hyogo, Japan
[8] Water Resources Environm Ctr, Kojimachi, Japan
[9] Nara Womens Univ, Div Nat Sci, Nara, Japan
[10] Tokyo Univ Agr & Technol, Inst Agr, Fuchu, Tokyo, Japan
[11] Hokkaido Res Org, Forestry Res Inst, Bibai, Hokkaido 0790198, Japan
关键词
aquatic animals; climate change; complementarity; eco-DRR; river; win-win strategy; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; RELOCATION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.13517
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim Natural disaster risk reduction (DRR) is becoming a more important function of protected area (PAs) for current and future global warming. However, biodiversity conservation and DRR have been handled separately and their interrelationship has not been explicitly addressed. This is mainly because, due of prevailing strategies and criteria for PA placement, a large proportion of PAs are currently located far from human-occupied areas, and habitats in human-occupied areas have been largely ignored as potential sites for conservation despite their high biodiversity. If intensely developed lowland areas with high flooding risk overlap with important sites for biodiversity conservation, it would be reasonable to try to harmonize biodiversity conservation and human development in human-inhabited lowland areas. Here, we examined whether extant PAs can conserve macroinvertebrate and freshwater fish biodiversity and whether human-inhabited lowland flood risk management sites might be suitable to designate as freshwater protected areas (FPAs). Location Across Japan. Methods We examined whether extant PAs can conserve macroinvertebrate and freshwater fish biodiversity and analysed the relationship between candidate sites for new FPAs and flood disaster risk and land use intensity at a national scale across Japan based on distribution data for 131 freshwater fish species and 1395 macroinvertebrate species. Results We found that extant PAs overlapped with approximately 30% of conservation-priority grid cells (1 km(2)) for both taxa. Particularly for red-listed species, only one species of freshwater fish and three species of macroinvertebrate achieved the representation target within extant PAs. Moreover, more than 40% of candidate conservation-priority grid cells were located in flood risk and human-occupied areas for both taxa. Main conclusions Floodplain conservation provides suitable habitat for many freshwater organisms and helps control floodwaters, so establishing new FPAs in areas with high flood risk could be a win-win strategy for conserving freshwater biodiversity and enhancing ecosystem-based DRR (eco-DRR).
引用
收藏
页码:1191 / 1201
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Terrestrial-focused protected areas are effective for conservation of freshwater fish diversity in Lake Tanganyika [J].
Britton, A. W. ;
Day, J. J. ;
Doble, C. J. ;
Ngatunga, B. P. ;
Kemp, K. M. ;
Carbone, C. ;
Murrell, D. J. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 212 :120-129
[32]   An evaluation of the effectiveness of Critical Biodiversity Areas, identified through a systematic conservation planning process, to reduce biodiversity loss outside protected areas in South Africa [J].
von Staden, Lize ;
Lotter, Mervyn C. ;
Holness, Stephen ;
Lombard, Amanda T. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2022, 115
[33]   A Protected Area Connectivity Evaluation and Strategy Development Framework for Post-2020 Biodiversity Conservation [J].
Zhao, Zhicong ;
Wang, Pei ;
Wang, Xiaoshan ;
Wang, Fangyi ;
Tseng, Tz-Hsuan ;
Cao, Yue ;
Hou, Shuyu ;
Peng, Jiayuan ;
Yang, Rui .
LAND, 2022, 11 (10)
[34]   Bridging the gap between the scale of protected areas and the conservation target of Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in Anhui Province [J].
Li, Jing ;
Sun, Yiyan ;
Wang, Li ;
Wang, Yuan .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 155
[35]   Freshwater crabs of the Near East: Increased extinction risk from climate change and underrepresented within protected areas [J].
Yousefi, Masoud ;
Naderloo, Reza ;
Keikhosrav, Alireza .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2022, 38
[36]   Reconciling forest profitability and biodiversity conservation under disturbance risk: the role of forest management and salvage logging [J].
Augustynczik, Andrey L. D. ;
Asbeck, Thomas ;
Basile, Marco ;
Jonker, Marlotte ;
Knuff, Anna ;
Yousefpour, Rasoul ;
Hanewinkel, Marc .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (09)
[37]   A research strategy for biodiversity conservation on New Zealand's offshore islands [J].
Towns, David R. ;
Bellingham, Peter J. ;
Mulder, Christa P. H. ;
Lyver, Phil O'B. .
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2012, 36 (01) :1-20
[38]   Monsoon flood risks in urban areas of Pakistan: A way forward for risk reduction and adaptation planning [J].
Zia, Azka ;
Rana, Irfan Ahmad ;
Arshad, Hafiz Syed Hamid ;
Khalid, Zainab ;
Nawaz, Adnan .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 336
[39]   Citizens' perspectives on marine protected areas as a governance strategy to effectively preserve marine ecosystem services and biodiversity [J].
Tonin, Stefania .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 34 :189-200
[40]   Implications of forest management on the conservation of protected areas: A new proposal in Central Spain [J].
Ezquerro, Marta ;
Diaz-Balteiro, Luis ;
Pardos, Marta .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 548