Reconciling biodiversity conservation and flood risk reduction: The new strategy for freshwater protected areas

被引:8
作者
Akasaka, Takumi [1 ]
Mori, Terutaka [2 ]
Ishiyama, Nobuo [3 ,11 ]
Takekawa, Yuya [4 ]
Kawamoto, Tomonori [5 ]
Inoue, Mikio [6 ]
Mitsuhashi, Hiromune [7 ]
Kawaguchi, Yoichi [4 ]
Ichiyanagi, Hidetaka [8 ]
Onikura, Norio [5 ]
Miyake, Yo [6 ]
Katano, Izumi [9 ]
Akasaka, Munemitsu [10 ]
Nakamura, Futoshi [3 ]
机构
[1] Obihiro Univ Agr & Vet Med, Lab Conservat Ecol, Obihiro, Hokkaido 0808555, Japan
[2] Publ Works Res Inst, Aqua Restorat Res Ctr, Kakamigahara, Japan
[3] Hokkaido Univ, Grad Sch Agr, Dept Forest Sci, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[4] Tokushima Univ, Grad Sch Technol Ind & Social Sci, Tokushima, Japan
[5] Kyushu Univ, Fishery Res Lab, Tsuyazaki, Fukutsu, Japan
[6] Ehime Univ, Grad Sch Sci & Engn, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
[7] Museum Nat & Human Act, Sanda, Hyogo, Japan
[8] Water Resources Environm Ctr, Kojimachi, Japan
[9] Nara Womens Univ, Div Nat Sci, Nara, Japan
[10] Tokyo Univ Agr & Technol, Inst Agr, Fuchu, Tokyo, Japan
[11] Hokkaido Res Org, Forestry Res Inst, Bibai, Hokkaido 0790198, Japan
关键词
aquatic animals; climate change; complementarity; eco-DRR; river; win-win strategy; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; RELOCATION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.13517
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim Natural disaster risk reduction (DRR) is becoming a more important function of protected area (PAs) for current and future global warming. However, biodiversity conservation and DRR have been handled separately and their interrelationship has not been explicitly addressed. This is mainly because, due of prevailing strategies and criteria for PA placement, a large proportion of PAs are currently located far from human-occupied areas, and habitats in human-occupied areas have been largely ignored as potential sites for conservation despite their high biodiversity. If intensely developed lowland areas with high flooding risk overlap with important sites for biodiversity conservation, it would be reasonable to try to harmonize biodiversity conservation and human development in human-inhabited lowland areas. Here, we examined whether extant PAs can conserve macroinvertebrate and freshwater fish biodiversity and whether human-inhabited lowland flood risk management sites might be suitable to designate as freshwater protected areas (FPAs). Location Across Japan. Methods We examined whether extant PAs can conserve macroinvertebrate and freshwater fish biodiversity and analysed the relationship between candidate sites for new FPAs and flood disaster risk and land use intensity at a national scale across Japan based on distribution data for 131 freshwater fish species and 1395 macroinvertebrate species. Results We found that extant PAs overlapped with approximately 30% of conservation-priority grid cells (1 km(2)) for both taxa. Particularly for red-listed species, only one species of freshwater fish and three species of macroinvertebrate achieved the representation target within extant PAs. Moreover, more than 40% of candidate conservation-priority grid cells were located in flood risk and human-occupied areas for both taxa. Main conclusions Floodplain conservation provides suitable habitat for many freshwater organisms and helps control floodwaters, so establishing new FPAs in areas with high flood risk could be a win-win strategy for conserving freshwater biodiversity and enhancing ecosystem-based DRR (eco-DRR).
引用
收藏
页码:1191 / 1201
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Protected Areas: From Biodiversity Conservation to the Social-Ecological Dimension
    Pilogallo, Angela
    Falasca, Federico
    Marucci, Alessandro
    INNOVATION IN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING, VOL 2, INPUT 2023, 2024, 463 : 159 - 168
  • [22] Protected areas maintain neotropical freshwater bird biodiversity in the face of human activity
    Barocas, Adi
    Tobler, Mathias W.
    Valladares, Nicole Abanto
    Pardo, Alejandro Alarcon
    Macdonald, David W.
    Swaisgood, Ronald R.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 150
  • [23] Mapping biodiversity conservation priorities for protected areas: A case study in Xishuangbanna Tropical Area, China
    Huang, Zhongde
    Bai, Yang
    Alatalo, Juha M.
    Yang, Zhangqian
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 249
  • [24] Protected Areas and Endemic Freshwater Fishes of the Cape Fold Ecoregion: Missing the Boat for Fish Conservation?
    Jordaan, Martine S.
    Chakona, Albert
    van der Colff, Dewidine
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 8
  • [25] Reconciling biodiversity conservation and food security: scientific challenges for a new agriculture
    Brussaard, Lijbert
    Caron, Patrick
    Campbell, Bruce
    Lipper, Leslie
    Mainka, Susan
    Rabbinge, Rudy
    Babin, Didier
    Pulleman, Mirjam
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2010, 2 (1-2) : 34 - 42
  • [26] A dark side of conservation biology: Protected areas fail in representing subterranean biodiversity
    Colado, Raquel
    Abellan, Pedro
    Pallares, Susana
    Mammola, Stefano
    Milione, Roberto
    Faille, Arnaud
    Fresneda, Javier
    Sanchez-Fernandez, David
    INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY, 2023, 16 (05) : 674 - 683
  • [27] Freshwater conservation potential of protected areas in the Tennessee and Cumberland River Basins, USA
    Thieme, Michele L.
    Sindorf, N.
    Higgins, J.
    Abell, R.
    Takats, J. A.
    Naidoo, R.
    Barnett, A.
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2016, 26 : 60 - 77
  • [28] Biodiversity conservation and ecological value of protected areas: a review of current situation and future prospects
    He, Xiangyu
    Wei, Hongbin
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 11
  • [29] Identify priority protected areas for biodiversity conservation adapting to future climate and land cover changes
    Liu, Ruixue
    Kong, Huilin
    Wang, Qixuan
    Li, Yun
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2025, 170
  • [30] Terrestrial-focused protected areas are effective for conservation of freshwater fish diversity in Lake Tanganyika
    Britton, A. W.
    Day, J. J.
    Doble, C. J.
    Ngatunga, B. P.
    Kemp, K. M.
    Carbone, C.
    Murrell, D. J.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 212 : 120 - 129