MONITOR UNIT CHECKING IN HETEROGENEOUS STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING

被引:3
作者
Higgins, Patrick D. [1 ]
Adolfson, Troy
Cho, L. Chinsoo
Saxena, Rishik
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Therapeut Radiol Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
SBRT; Dose verification; Density effects; VIVO DIODE DOSIMETRY; IMRT; ALGORITHMS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2010.04.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Treatment of lung cancer using very-high-dose fractionation in small fields requires well-tested dose modeling, a method for density-averaging compound targets constructed from different parts of the breathing cycle, and monitor unit verification of the heterogeneity-corrected treatment plans. The quality and safety of each procedure are dependent on these factors. We have evaluated the dosimetry of our first 26 stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients, including 260 treatment fields, planned with the Pinnacle treatment planning system. All targets were combined from full expiration and inspiration computed tomography scans and planned on the normal respiration scan with 6-MV photons. Combined GTVs (cGTVs) have been density-averaged in different ways for comparison of the effect on total monitor units. In addition, we have compared planned monitor units against hand calculations using 2 classic ID correction methods: (1) effective attenuation and (2) ratio of Tissue-Maximum Ratios (TMRs) to determine the range of efficacy of simple verification methods over difficult-to-perform measurements. Different methods of density averaging for combined targets have been found to have minimal impact on total dose as evidenced by the range of total monitor units generated for each method. Nondensity-corrected treatment plans for the same fields were found to require about 8% more monitor units on average. Hand calculations, using the effective attenuation method were found to agree with Pinnacle calculations for nonproblematic fields to within +/-10% for >95% of the fields tested. The ratio of TMRs method was found to be unacceptable. Reasonable choices for density-averaging of cGTVs using full inspiration/expiration scans should not strongly affect the planning dose. Verification of planned monitor units, as a check for problematic fields, can be done for 6-MV fields with simple 1D effective attenuation-corrected hand calculations. (C) 2011 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 263
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] IN VIVO DIODE DOSIMETRY FOR IMRT TREATMENTS GENERATED BY PINNACLE TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM
    Alaei, Parham
    Higgins, Patrick D.
    Gerbi, Bruce J.
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2009, 34 (01) : 26 - 29
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1983, MED PHYS, V10, P741
  • [3] Accuracy of two heterogeneity dose calculation algorithms for IMRT in treatment plans designed using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom
    Davidson, Scott E.
    Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
    Prado, Karl L.
    Dong, Lei
    Liao, Zhongxing
    Followill, David S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (05) : 1850 - 1857
  • [4] Technical note: Heterogeneity dose calculation accuracy in IMRT: Study of five commercial treatment planning systems using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom
    Davidson, Scott E.
    Popple, Richard A.
    Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
    Followill, David S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (12) : 5434 - 5439
  • [5] Impact of inhomogeneity corrections on dose coverage in the treatment of lung cancer using stereotactic body radiation therapy
    Ding, George X.
    Duggan, Dennis M.
    Lu, Bo
    Hallahan, Dennis E.
    Cmelak, Anthony
    Malcolm, Arnold
    Newton, Jared
    Deeley, Matthew
    Coffey, Charles W.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (07) : 2985 - 2994
  • [6] Extraction of primary signal from EPIDs using only forward convolution
    Hansen, VN
    Swindell, W
    Evans, PM
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (09) : 1477 - 1484
  • [7] In vivo diode dosimetry for routine quality assurance in IMRT
    Higgins, PD
    Alaei, P
    Gerbi, BJ
    Dusenbery, KE
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (12) : 3118 - 3123
  • [8] Comparison of inhomogeneity correction algorithms in small photon fields
    Jones, AO
    Das, IJ
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (03) : 766 - 776
  • [9] A CONVOLUTION METHOD OF CALCULATING DOSE FOR 15-MV X-RAYS
    MACKIE, TR
    SCRIMGER, JW
    BATTISTA, JJ
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1985, 12 (02) : 188 - 196
  • [10] Papanikolaou N., 1997, WORLD C MED PHYS 2 S, V35, P915