The Voice of the Consumer: A Survey of Veterans and Other Users of Assistive Technology

被引:44
作者
Dicianno, Brad E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Joseph, James [1 ]
Sergeant, Gunnery [1 ]
Eckstein, Stacy [1 ]
Zigler, Christina K. [1 ,2 ]
Quinby, Eleanor [2 ]
Schmeler, Mark R. [3 ]
Schein, Richard M. [3 ]
Pearlman, Jon [1 ,3 ]
Cooper, Rory A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] VA Pittsburgh Healthcare Syst, Human Engn Res Labs, Pittsburgh, PA 15206 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Dept Rehabil Sci & Technol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; WHEELED MOBILITY; ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES; WHEELCHAIR; PRIORITIES; PEOPLE; PARTICIPATION; REPAIRS; LIFE;
D O I
10.1093/milmed/usy033
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: A total of 3.6 million Americans and over 250,000 veterans use wheelchairs. The need for advancements in mobility-assistive technologies is continually growing due to advances in medicine and rehabilitation that preserve and prolong the lives of people with disabilities, increases in the senior population, and increases in the number of veterans and civilians involved in conflict situations. The purpose of this study is to survey a large sample of veterans and other consumers with disabilities who use mobility-assistive technologies to identify priorities for future research and development. Materials and Methods: This survey asked participants to provide opinions on the importance of developing various mobility-assistive technologies and to rank the importance of certain technologies. Participants were also asked to provide open-ended comments and suggestions. Results: A total of 1,022 individuals, including 500 veterans, from 49 states within the USA and Puerto Rico completed the survey. The average age of respondents was 54.3 yr, and they represented both new and experienced users of mobility-assistive technologies. The largest diagnostic group was spinal cord injury (SCI) (N = 491, 48.0%). Several themes on critical areas of research emerged from the open-ended questions, which generated a total of 1,199 comments. Conclusion: This survey revealed several themes for future research and development. Advanced wheelchair design, smart device applications, human- machine interfaces, and assistive robotics and intelligent systems emerged as priorities. Survey results also demonstrated the importance for researchers to understand the effects of policy and cost on translational research and to be involved in educating both consumers and providers.
引用
收藏
页码:E518 / E525
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Targeting recovery: Priorities of the spinal cord-injured population [J].
Anderson, KD .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2004, 21 (10) :1371-1383
[2]  
[Anonymous], P70131 CENS BUR
[3]  
Brad E, 2018, DISABIL REHABIL ASSI
[4]   Assessing the influence of wheelchair technology on perception of participation in spinal cord injury [J].
Chaves, ES ;
Boninger, ML ;
Cooper, R ;
Fitzgerald, SG ;
Gray, DB ;
Cooper, RA .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 85 (11) :1854-1858
[5]   Wheelchair research progress, perspectives, and transformation [J].
Cooper, Rory A. .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 49 (01) :1-5
[6]   Manual wheeled mobility - current and future developments from the human engineering research laboratories [J].
Cooper, Rory A. ;
Koontz, Alicia M. ;
Ding, Dan ;
Kelleher, Annmarie ;
Rice, Ian ;
Cooper, Rosemarie .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 32 (26) :2210-2221
[7]  
Cooper Rory A, 2010, Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, V21, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.pmr.2009.07.004
[8]   Recent trends in assistive technology for mobility [J].
Cowan, Rachel E. ;
Fregly, Benjamin J. ;
Boninger, Michael L. ;
Chan, Leighton ;
Rodgers, Mary M. ;
Reinkensmeyer, David J. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 9
[9]   Changes in the quality of life in severely disabled people following provision of powered indoor/outdoor chairs [J].
Davies, A ;
De Souza, LH ;
Frank, AO .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 25 (06) :286-290
[10]  
Dent C., 2015, HEARING SUBCOMMITTEE, P733