Test-retest variability of Randot stereoacuity measures gathered in an unselected sample of UK primary school children

被引:16
作者
Adler, Paul
Scally, Andrew J. [2 ]
Barrett, Brendan T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bradford, Sch Optometry & Vis Sci, Bradford BD7 1DP, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Bradford, Sch Hlth Studies, Inst Hlth Res, Bradford BD7 1DP, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
CIRCLES; TITMUS; TNO; PARAMETERS; FRISBY;
D O I
10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300729
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Aim To determine the test-retest reliability of the Randot stereoacuity test when used as part of vision screening in schools. Methods Randot stereoacuity (graded-circles) and logMAR visual acuity measures were gathered in an unselected sample of 139 children (aged 4-12, mean 8.1 +/- 2.1 years) in two schools. Randot testing was repeated on two occasions (average interval between successive tests 8 days, range: 1-21 days). Three Randot scores were obtained in 97.8% of children. Results Randot stereoacuity improved by an average of one plate (ie, one test level) on repeat testing but was little changed when tested on the third occasion. Within-subject variability was up to three test levels on repeat testing. When stereoacuity was categorised as 'fine', 'intermediate' or 'coarse', the greatest variability was found among younger children who exhibited 'intermediate' or 'coarse'/nil stereopsis on initial testing. Whereas 90.8% of children with 'fine' stereopsis (<= 50 arc-seconds) on the first test exhibited 'fine' stereopsis on both subsequent tests, only similar to 16% of children with 'intermediate' (>50 but <= 140 arc-seconds) or 'coarse'/nil (>= 200 arc-seconds) stereoacuity on initial testing exhibited stable test results on repeat testing. Conclusions Children exhibiting abnormal stereoacuity on initial testing are very likely to exhibit a normal result when retested. The value of a single, abnormal Randot graded-circles stereoacuity measure from school screening is therefore questionable.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 661
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Defining Real Change in Measures of Stereoacuity [J].
Adams, Wendy E. ;
Leske, David A. ;
Hatt, Sarah R. ;
Holmes, Jonathan M. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 116 (02) :281-285
[2]  
Birch E, 1997, J PEDIAT OPHTH STRAB, V34, P217
[3]   Randot® Preschool Stereoacuity Test:: Normative data and validity [J].
Birch, Eileen ;
Williams, Cathy ;
Drover, James ;
Fu, Valeria ;
Cheng, Christina ;
Northstone, Kate ;
Courage, Mary ;
Adams, Russell .
JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2008, 12 (01) :23-26
[4]   Random Dot E stereotest: Testability and reliability in 3- to 5-year-old children [J].
Ciner, Elise ;
Dobson, Velma ;
Maguire, Maureen ;
Moore, Bruce ;
Peskin, Ellen ;
Quinn, Graham ;
Schwidt, Paulette ;
Schultz, Janet .
JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2006, 10 (06) :507-514
[5]  
Clarke W N, 1990, J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus, V27, P161
[6]  
COOPER J, 1979, J AM OPTOM ASSOC, V50, P821
[7]   An evaluation of the agreement betwwn contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests [J].
Fawcett, SL .
JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2005, 9 (06) :572-578
[8]   Validity of the titmus and randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders [J].
Fawcett, SL ;
Birch, EE .
JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2003, 7 (05) :333-338
[9]   Interobserver test-retest reliability of the randot preschool stereoacuity test [J].
Fawcett, SL ;
Birch, EE .
JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2000, 4 (06) :354-358
[10]  
FRIEDMAN JR, 1985, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V103, P37