Palliative radiotherapy for thoracic spine metastases: Dosimetric advantage of three-dimensional conformal plans

被引:6
|
作者
Yeo, Seung-Gu [1 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Soonchunhyang Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Coll Med, Cheonan 330721, South Korea
关键词
spine; metastases; palliation; three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy; dosimetry; BONE METASTASES; BREAST-CANCER; HEART-DISEASE; LUNG-CANCER; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.3892/ol.2015.3205
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to investigate the dosimetric advantages of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) for thoracic spine metastases and compare it with conventional two-dimensional (2D) plans. Radiation therapy (RT) planning data of 10 patients with mid-to-low thoracic spine metastases were analyzed. Computed tomography simulation was performed and the planning target volume (PTV), heart, esophagus, lung and spinal cord were contoured. The 3DCRT plan comprised one posteroanterior (PA) field and two posterior oblique fields. The 2D plans used a single PA field or opposed anteroposterior (AP)/PA fields. The prescription dose of radiation was 30 Gy in 10 fractions. All comparisons of the maximum or mean doses to the organs at risk or the PTV, between two of the three RT plans, demonstrated statistically significant differences (P<0.05), with the exception of the mean esophageal doses between the single PA vs. AP/PA (P=0.285) plans. The mean heart doses were 15.0 +/- 3.1 Gy in single PA, 17.3 +/- 4.3 Gy in AP/PA and 8.5 +/- 1.7 Gy using 3DCRT. The median reduction rates using 3DCRT were 38.9% compared with single PA (range, 29.4-58.5%) or 47.5% relative to AP/PA (range, 34.5-67.1%). The mean esophageal doses were 17.9 +/- 2.3 Gy in single PA, 18.2 +/- 2.2 Gy in AP/PA and 15.3 +/- 1.9 Gy in 3DCRT. The median reduction rate using 3DCRT was 12.8% compared with single PA or 15.6% relative to AP/PA. Compared with the single PA or AP/PA 2D plan, 3DCRT reduced the median dose by 13.7 or 1.9% of the maximum spinal cord dose, respectively, and 14.7 or 2.9% of the maximum PTV dose, respectively. The mean lung doses were 2.7 +/- 0.7 Gy in single PA, 2.6 +/- 0.7 Gy in AP/PA and 5.1 +/- 1.0 Gy in 3DCRT. In conclusion, 3DCRT for mid-to-low thoracic spine metastases demonstrated significant dosimetric advantages by reducing the unnecessary irradiation of critical organs, particularly the heart, and by achieving a homogeneous target dose.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 501
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for left-sided chest wall and lymphatic irradiation
    Kivanc, Huseyin
    Gultekin, Melis
    Gurkaynak, Murat
    Ozyigit, Gokhan
    Yildiz, Ferah
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (12): : 36 - 44
  • [2] Dosimetric Evaluation of Three-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy, RapidArc, and Hybrid RapidArc Radiotherapy Techniques for Left-sided Breast Cancer
    Mishra, Atul
    Yadav, Neha
    Sharma, Madhu
    Mittal, Kailash Kumar
    Mishra, Surendra Prasad
    Verma, Teerth Raj
    Tiwari, Shilpa
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025, 50 (01) : 93 - 99
  • [3] Comparative dosimetric evaluation of three-dimensional conformal and stereotactic radiotherapy for treatment of intracranial tumors
    Gupta, Manoj
    Babaiah, M.
    Kumar, M. Dinesh
    Hirapara, Pushpendra H.
    Patidar, Arvind K.
    Walke, Rahul V.
    JOURNAL OF THE EGYPTIAN NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2012, 24 (04) : 169 - 173
  • [4] Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for cerebral malignant gliomas
    Zheng, Ruifeng
    Fan, Ruitai
    Wen, Haiying
    Luo, Junbo
    Yang, Yang
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2015, 20 (01): : 248 - 252
  • [5] A comparison of dosimetric parameters between tomotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in rectal cancer
    Mina Yu
    Joo Hwan Lee
    Hong Seok Jang
    Dong Min Jeon
    Jae Suk Cheon
    Hyo Chun Lee
    Jong Hoon Lee
    Radiation Oncology, 8
  • [6] A comparison of dosimetric parameters between tomotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in rectal cancer
    Yu, Mina
    Lee, Joo Hwan
    Jang, Hong Seok
    Jeon, Dong Min
    Cheon, Jae Suk
    Lee, Hyo Chun
    Lee, Jong Hoon
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [7] The Effect of the Number of Fields on Radiotherapy Plans of Breast Cancer Patients in Three-Dimensionally Conformal Radiotherapy Plans: Dosimetric Studies
    Bazeed, Zezy Mansour
    Attalla, Ehab Maarouf
    Awad, Ibrahim Ali Mohamed
    Hamid, Maysa Ismail Abdel
    Sarhan, Afaf
    MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 12 (04) : 516 - 526
  • [8] Local response and pathologic fractures following stereotactic body radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for spinal metastases - a randomized controlled trial
    Sprave, Tanja
    Verma, Vivek
    Foerster, Robert
    Schlampp, Ingmar
    Hees, Katharina
    Bruckner, Thomas
    Bostel, Tilman
    El Shafie, Rami Ateyah
    Welzel, Thomas
    Nicolay, Nils Henrik
    Debus, Juergen
    Rief, Harald
    BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [9] Randomized phase II trial evaluating pain response in patients with spinal metastases following stereotactic body radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy
    Sprave, Tanja
    Verma, Vivek
    Foerster, Robert
    Schlampp, Ingmar
    Bruckner, Thomas
    Bostel, Tilman
    Welte, Stefan Ezechiel
    Tonndorf-Martini, Eric
    Nicolay, Nils Henrik
    Debus, Juergen
    Rief, Harald
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 128 (02) : 274 - 282
  • [10] Field-in-Field Technique Improves the Dosimetric Outcome of Treatment Plans Compared with the Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer Radiotherapy
    Ghadimi, Behnam
    Jabbari, Nasrollah
    Karimkhani, Laya
    Mostafanezhad, Kamal
    UHOD-ULUSLARARASI HEMATOLOJI-ONKOLOJI DERGISI, 2018, 28 (02): : 79 - 85