Application of fuzzy logic for the integration of environmental criteria in ecodesign

被引:29
作者
Herva, Marta [1 ]
Franco-Uria, Amaya [2 ]
Carrasco, Eugenio F. [1 ]
Roc, Enrique [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Sch Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Sustainable Proc & Prod Engn & Management Grp, Santiago, Spain
[2] Marine Res Inst IIM CSIC, Proc Engn Grp, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Ecological Footprint; Life Cycle Assessment; Environmental Risk Assessment; Fuzzy logic; Ecodesign tool; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; EXPOSURE; RISK; METHODOLOGY; QUALITY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.148
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The ecodesign of a product implies that different potential environmental problems of diverse nature must be considered, apart from the general design criteria (i.e., technical, functional, ergonomic, aesthetic or economical). In this sense, an ecodesign tool integrating the criteria provided by three environmental evaluation methodologies, namely Ecological Footprint (EF), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA), has been constructed on the basis of fuzzy logic reasoning and features. This idea enabled the decision making at process and product level taking into account the values of the different indicators at a time. The relative importance of each of them has been established through the definition of membership functions as inputs to the fuzzy inference reasoning procedure in the case of a specific product. As a result, a Fuzzy EcoDesign Index (FEcoDI) was obtained. A well known case study was used to test the tool. Different packaging materials for a beverage bottle were considered to identify the most environmentally friendly option. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4427 / 4431
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] AENOR, 2003, 150301 AENOR UNE
  • [2] Evaluating strategies for sustainable development: fuzzy logic reasoning and sensitivity analysis
    Andriantiatsaholiniaina, LA
    Kouikoglou, VS
    Phillis, YA
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 48 (02) : 149 - 172
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M, DOI DOI 10.1002/JTR
  • [4] Indicators of sustainable development for industry: A general framework
    Azapagic, A
    Perdan, S
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2000, 78 (B4) : 243 - 261
  • [5] BELLMAN RE, 1970, MANAGE SCI B-APPL, V17, pB141
  • [6] Blomberg C, 2007, PHYSICS OF LIFE: THE PHYSICIST'S ROAD TO BIOLOGY, P1
  • [7] Handling trade-offs in ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement
    Byggeth, Sophie
    Hochschorner, Elisabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2006, 14 (15-16) : 1420 - 1430
  • [8] Rule-based diagnosis and supervision of a pilot-scale wastewater treatment plant using fuzzy logic techniques
    Carrasco, EF
    Rodríguez, J
    Puñal, A
    Roca, E
    Lema, JM
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2002, 22 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [9] Clark K, 2003, HANDB ENVIRON CHEM, V3, P227
  • [10] CML (Institute of Environmental Sciences), CML 2 BAS 2000 V2 3