Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars

被引:40
|
作者
Bertero, H. D. [1 ,2 ]
Ruiz, R. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Catedra Prod Veg, Fac Agron, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Univ Buenos Aires, CONICET, Fac Agron, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
quinoa; Chenopodium quinoa; seed number; critical period; yield determination;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2007.07.002
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The identification of the critical period for seed determination is a central aspect for adequate crop management for higher yields. As important variability in the developmental stages associated to this critical period and its duration has been detected for several crops, results from one species cannot be extrapolated to other. The flowering period, from first anthesis to the end of flowering, appears as the most sensitive to the environment in quinoa;, as results from experiments conducted under field conditions in the Argentinean pampas, using sea level quinoa cultivars adapted to temperate environments. suggest. Data from a combination of four cultivars, three densities and 2 years were used to estimate the association (adjusted R-2) between crop biomass increment (g m(-2)) and seed number (seeds m(-2)) for four phases: vegetative, reproductive, flowering and seed filling. The strongest association was that detected for the flowering phase (R-2 = 0.71), followed by seed filling (R-2 = 0.64); associations for the two phases preceding first anthesis, were low. Differences in biomass increment during flowering where strongly associated with crop growth rate (g m(-2) day(-1)) during flowering (R-2 = 0.86); crop growth rate was associated to differences in the amount of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (MJ m(-2) day(-1)) (R-2 = 0.79) and radiation use efficiency (R-2 = 0.71). Significant differences between cultivars were detected for reproductive efficiencies (seeds per gram of particle biomass at the end of flowering or seeds per gram of panicle biomass increment during flowering) in I year, but differences in biomass partitioning to the inflorescence during flowering were not significant. A negative association between reproductive efficiencies and panicle biomass was observed, and possible determinants of this association are discussed in the light of available knowledge for the species. As in several other crop species, maximization of growth during the late reproductive period appears as the main target for crop management. As radiation interception efficiencies were usually below 0.95 this variable explained most variation in growth during flowering, but even crops managed for maximum radiation interception could exhibit differences in biomass increment associated to variability in radiation use efficiency and perhaps the duration of flowering. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 194
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sustainability of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) production systems
    Pinedo-Taco, Rember
    Gomez-Pando, Luz
    Julca-Otiniano, Alberto
    ECOSISTEMAS Y RECURSOS AGROPECUARIOS, 2018, 5 (15): : 399 - 409
  • [22] Assessment of the nutritional composition of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Nowak, Verena
    Du, Juan
    Charrondiere, U. Ruth
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2016, 193 : 47 - 54
  • [23] Frost resistance mechanisms in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Jacobsen, S.-E.
    Monteros, C.
    Corcuera, L. J.
    Bravo, L. A.
    Christiansen, J. L.
    Mujica, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2007, 26 (04) : 471 - 475
  • [24] Physiological and Morphological Responses of two Quinoa Cultivars (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to Drought Stress
    Ali, Oudou Issa
    Fghire, Rachid
    Anaya, Fatima
    Benlhabib, Ouafae
    Wahbi, Said
    GESUNDE PFLANZEN, 2019, 71 (02): : 123 - 133
  • [25] Light interception and radiation use efficiency in temperate quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars
    Ruiz, R. A.
    Bertero, H. D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2008, 29 (2-3) : 144 - 152
  • [26] Determination of Germination Characteristics of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in Different Salt Concentrations
    Akcay, Emre
    Tan, Mustafa
    ALINTERI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE SCIENCES, 2018, 33 (01): : 85 - 91
  • [27] The critical period for yield and grain protein determination in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Vasquez, Santiago C.
    del Pozo, Alejandro
    Castillo, Dalma
    Matus, Ivan
    Gomez-Pando, Luz
    Zamudio-Ayala, Diego
    Mignone, Cesar M.
    Bertero, H. Daniel
    Calderini, Daniel F.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2024, 306
  • [28] Assessment and comparison of nutritional qualities of thirty quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seed varieties
    Chen, Xuan
    Zhang, Yueyue
    Cao, Beier
    Wei, Xiaonan
    Shen, Zhenguo
    Su, Nana
    FOOD CHEMISTRY-X, 2023, 19
  • [29] Accumulation of Ions in Shoot and Seed of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Under Salinity Stress
    Maleki, Parisa
    Saadat, Saeed
    Bahrami, Hossein Ali
    Rezaei, Hamed
    Esmaeelnejad, Leila
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2019, 50 (06) : 782 - 793
  • [30] Modeling seed germination of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) at different temperatures and water potentials
    Soureshjani, Hedayatollah Karimzadeh
    Bahador, Mahmoud
    Tadayon, Mahmoud Reza
    Dehkordi, Ayoub Ghorbani
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM, 2022, 44 (10)