Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars

被引:40
|
作者
Bertero, H. D. [1 ,2 ]
Ruiz, R. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Catedra Prod Veg, Fac Agron, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Univ Buenos Aires, CONICET, Fac Agron, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
quinoa; Chenopodium quinoa; seed number; critical period; yield determination;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2007.07.002
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The identification of the critical period for seed determination is a central aspect for adequate crop management for higher yields. As important variability in the developmental stages associated to this critical period and its duration has been detected for several crops, results from one species cannot be extrapolated to other. The flowering period, from first anthesis to the end of flowering, appears as the most sensitive to the environment in quinoa;, as results from experiments conducted under field conditions in the Argentinean pampas, using sea level quinoa cultivars adapted to temperate environments. suggest. Data from a combination of four cultivars, three densities and 2 years were used to estimate the association (adjusted R-2) between crop biomass increment (g m(-2)) and seed number (seeds m(-2)) for four phases: vegetative, reproductive, flowering and seed filling. The strongest association was that detected for the flowering phase (R-2 = 0.71), followed by seed filling (R-2 = 0.64); associations for the two phases preceding first anthesis, were low. Differences in biomass increment during flowering where strongly associated with crop growth rate (g m(-2) day(-1)) during flowering (R-2 = 0.86); crop growth rate was associated to differences in the amount of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (MJ m(-2) day(-1)) (R-2 = 0.79) and radiation use efficiency (R-2 = 0.71). Significant differences between cultivars were detected for reproductive efficiencies (seeds per gram of particle biomass at the end of flowering or seeds per gram of panicle biomass increment during flowering) in I year, but differences in biomass partitioning to the inflorescence during flowering were not significant. A negative association between reproductive efficiencies and panicle biomass was observed, and possible determinants of this association are discussed in the light of available knowledge for the species. As in several other crop species, maximization of growth during the late reproductive period appears as the main target for crop management. As radiation interception efficiencies were usually below 0.95 this variable explained most variation in growth during flowering, but even crops managed for maximum radiation interception could exhibit differences in biomass increment associated to variability in radiation use efficiency and perhaps the duration of flowering. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 194
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reproductive partitioning in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars
    Bertero, H. D.
    Ruiz, R. A.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2010, 118 (01) : 94 - 101
  • [2] Seed weight determination in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Gomez, Maria B.
    Curti, Ramiro N.
    Bertero, Hector D.
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2022, 208 (02) : 243 - 254
  • [3] Aerodynamic properties of two quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars
    Caetano, Jordana Moura
    Devilla, Ivano Alessandro
    Melo, Pamella de Carvalho
    Servulo, Ana Claudia Oliveira
    Ferreira, Rafael Batista
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS AGRARIAS-AGRARIA, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [4] The influence of temperature on seed germination rate in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Jacobsen, SE
    Bach, AP
    SEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 26 (02) : 515 - 523
  • [5] Photoperiodic effect on flowering and seed development in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Christiansen, J. L.
    Jacobsen, S-E
    Jorgensen, S. T.
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2010, 60 (06): : 539 - 544
  • [6] Ecdysteroids of Quinoa seeds (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Zhu, N
    Kikuzaki, H
    Vastano, BC
    Nakatani, N
    Karwe, MV
    Rosen, RT
    Ho, CT
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2001, 49 (05) : 2576 - 2578
  • [7] The worldwide potential for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Jacobsen, SE
    FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 19 (1-2) : 167 - 177
  • [8] Glycaemic properties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.).
    Zevallos, V.
    Grimble, G.
    Herencia, L. I.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 2006, 65 : 60A - 60A
  • [9] Determination and Characterization of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Saponins
    Verza, Simone G.
    Kaiser, Samuel
    de Resende, Pedro E.
    Ortega, George G.
    LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY, 2017, 36 (02): : 326 - 331
  • [10] The effect of seed moisture and temperature on grinding characteristics of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Hassoon, Waleed Hameed
    Dziki, Dariusz
    CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH TRENDS IN AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 10