共 44 条
Smoker's Paradox in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
被引:79
作者:
Gupta, Tanush
[1
]
Kolte, Dhaval
[2
]
Khera, Sahil
[1
]
Harikrishnan, Prakash
[1
]
Mujib, Marjan
[1
]
Aronow, Wilbert S.
[1
]
Jain, Diwakar
[1
]
Ahmed, Ali
[3
]
Cooper, Howard A.
[1
]
Frishman, William H.
[1
]
Bhatt, Deepak L.
[4
]
Fonarow, Gregg C.
[5
]
Panza, Julio A.
[1
]
机构:
[1] New York Med Coll, Macy Pavil,Room 148,100 Woods Rd, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Rhode Isl Hosp, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[3] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, 50 Irving St NW, Washington, DC 20422 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Heart & Vasc Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
来源:
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION
|
2016年
/
5卷
/
04期
关键词:
primary percutaneous coronary intervention;
smoker's paradox;
smoking;
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction;
RECEIVING THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY;
AMERICAN-HEART-ASSOCIATION;
SMOKING STATUS;
CIGARETTE-SMOKING;
CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE;
CLINICAL-OUTCOMES;
TRIAL;
CLOPIDOGREL;
PROGNOSIS;
IMPACT;
D O I:
10.1161/JAHA.116.003370
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background-Prior studies have found that smokers undergoing thrombolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction have lower in-hospital mortality than nonsmokers, a phenomenon called the "smoker's paradox." Evidence, however, has been conflicting regarding whether this paradoxical association persists in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results-We used the 2003-2012 National Inpatient Sample databases to identify all patients aged >= 18 years who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare in-hospital mortality between smokers (current and former) and nonsmokers. Of the 985 174 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, 438 954 (44.6%) were smokers. Smokers were younger, were more often men, and were less likely to have traditional vascular risk factors than nonsmokers. Smokers had lower observed in-hospital mortality compared with nonsmokers (2.0% versus 5.9%; unadjusted odds ratio 0.32, 95% CI 0.31-0.33, P<0.001). Although the association between smoking and lower in-hospital mortality was partly attenuated after baseline risk adjustment, a significant residual association remained (adjusted odds ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.58-0.62, P< 0.001). This association largely persisted in age-stratified analyses. Smoking status was also associated with shorter average length of stay (3.5 versus 4.5 days, P< 0.001) and lower incidence of postprocedure hemorrhage (4.2% versus 6.1%; adjusted odds ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.80-0.83, P< 0.001) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (1.3% versus 2.1%; adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.76-0.81, P< 0.001). Conclusions-In this nationwide cohort of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, we observed significantly lower risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality in smokers, suggesting that the smoker's paradox also applies to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文