Analysis of drug coverage before and after the implementation of Canada's Common Drug Review

被引:11
作者
Gamble, John-Michael [1 ]
Weir, Daniala L. [1 ]
Johnson, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
Eurich, Dean T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Sch Publ Hlth, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.1503/cmaj.110670
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Canada's Common Drug Review was implemented to provide publicly funded drug plans (provincial and federal) with a transparent, rigorous and consistent approach for assessing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new drugs. We compared uptake of drug coverage across jurisdictions before and after the implementation of the Common Drug Review. Methods: Using the IMS Brogan formulary acceptance: monitoring and evaluation database, we identified new drug products in Canada five years before and five years after the first recommendation was made by the Common Drug Review. For each jurisdiction, we compared the proportion of drugs listed, the median time-to-listing and the agreement between the listing decisions of the drug plans and the recommendations of the Common Drug Review. Results: We identified 198 new drugs approved for use in Canada between May 26, 1999, and May 27, 2009, of which 53 had a recommendation from the Common Drug Review. The proportion of drugs listed decreased after the introduction of the Common Drug Review for all participating drug plans (81.1% to 71.3% overall [p <= 0.01 for all plans, with the exceptions of Ontario and Quebec [p = 0.07]). The change in median time-to-listing between the periods before and after the Common Drug Review varied by jurisdiction, ranging from a decrease of 691 days to an increase of 250 days. The change in median time-to-listing was not statistically significant for most jurisdictions, with the exceptions of Saskatchewan (increased, Mann-Whitney U test p = 0.01) and New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador (all decreased, Mann-Whitney U test p < 0.01). Interpretation: There was a decline in the proportion of new drugs listed after the introduction of the Common Drug Review for both participating and nonparticipating jurisdictions. The introduction of the review was associated with a decreased time-to-listing for certain smaller provinces.
引用
收藏
页码:E1259 / E1266
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   A dog's breakfast: Prescription drug coverage varies widely across Canada [J].
Anis, AH ;
Guh, D ;
Wang, XH .
MEDICAL CARE, 2001, 39 (04) :315-326
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Drug expenditure in Canada, 1985 to 2010, P1
[3]  
*CAN AG DRUGS TECH, 2011, COMM DRUG REV PROC C
[4]  
*CAN AG DRUGS TECH, 2007, SUBMISBRIEF HOUS COM
[5]   Using Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness to Make Drug Coverage Decisions A Comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada [J].
Clement, Fiona M. ;
Harris, Anthony ;
Li, Jing Jing ;
Yong, Karen ;
Lee, Karen M. ;
Manns, Braden J. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (13) :1437-1443
[6]  
Gamble John-Michael, 2010, Healthc Policy, V6, pe117
[7]   Inter-provincial variation in government drug formularies [J].
Grégoire, JP ;
MacNeil, P ;
Skilton, K ;
Moisan, J ;
Menon, D ;
Jacobs, P ;
McKenzie, E ;
Ferguson, B .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2001, 92 (04) :307-312
[8]  
KALLAH J, 2006, PROVINCIAL REIMBURSE, V9, P57
[9]  
Lexchin J, 2008, AM J MANAG CARE, V14, P581
[10]   The Common Drug Review: A NICE start for Canada? [J].
McMahon, Meghan ;
Morgan, Steve ;
Mitton, Craig .
HEALTH POLICY, 2006, 77 (03) :339-351