Low Risk Offenders Under Probation Supervision: Risk Management and the Risk-Needs-Responsivity Framework

被引:20
作者
Viglione, Jill [1 ]
Taxman, Faye S. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Criminal Justice, 12805 Pegasus Dr, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] George Mason Univ, Law & Soc Dept, Criminol, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[3] George Mason Univ, Ctr Adv Correct Excellence, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
community supervision; risk and needs assessment; risk principle; low risk offenders; qualitative methods; CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; CLASSIFICATION; INTERVENTIONS; RECIDIVISM; PRINCIPLES; INVENTORY; CRIME; LEVEL; WORKS;
D O I
10.1177/0093854818790299
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Community supervision agencies commonly use resource allocation models to identify the amount of monitoring and treatment to provide individuals under supervision. The risk-needs-responsivity model guides these decisions, suggesting the level of supervision should align with one's risk level, with fewer services provided to those at a lower risk of recidivism. However, probation officers often operate under a risk management model with perceptions of risk guiding decisions. Using qualitative data, the current study examined the implementation of a telephone monitoring system for low risk offenders. This research explored (a) probation staff perceptions of telephone monitoring, (b) probation staff adaptations of telephone monitoring, and (c) individual and external influences related to telephone supervision use. Findings suggest officer perceptions of risk and liability affect use of telephone supervision for low risk probationers. Results highlight challenges associated with implementing the risk principle given tendencies to oversupervise as a means to protect public safety.
引用
收藏
页码:1809 / 1831
页数:23
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Andrews DA, 2010, PSYCHOLOGY OF CRIMINAL CONDUCT, 5TH EDITION, P1
[2]  
Andrews D.A., 1999, Forum on Corrections Research, V11, P18
[3]   CLASSIFICATION FOR EFFECTIVE REHABILITATION - REDISCOVERING PSYCHOLOGY [J].
ANDREWS, DA ;
BONTA, J ;
HOGE, RD .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 1990, 17 (01) :19-52
[4]   DOES CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT WORK - A CLINICALLY RELEVANT AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY INFORMED METAANALYSIS [J].
ANDREWS, DA ;
ZINGER, I ;
HOGE, RD ;
BONTA, J ;
GENDREAU, P ;
CULLEN, FT .
CRIMINOLOGY, 1990, 28 (03) :369-404
[5]  
[Anonymous], THE EXECUTIVE WAY
[6]   The effects of low-intensity supervision for lower-risk probationers: updated results from a randomized controlled trial [J].
Barnes, Geoffrey ;
Hyatt, Jordan ;
Ahlman, Lindsay ;
Kent, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF CRIME & JUSTICE, 2012, 35 (02) :200-220
[7]   Low-intensity community supervision for low-risk offenders: a randomized, controlled trial [J].
Barnes, Geoffrey C. ;
Ahlman, Lindsay ;
Gill, Charlotte ;
Sherman, Lawrence W. ;
Kurtz, Ellen ;
Malvestuto, Robert .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2010, 6 (02) :159-189
[8]  
Battalino J., 1996, Public Productivity Management Review, P24
[9]  
Belshaw S.H., 2011, International Journal of Punishment and Sentencing, V7, P98
[10]   Can electronic monitoring make a difference? An evaluation of three Canadian programs [J].
Bonta, J ;
Wallace-Capretta, S ;
Rooney, J .
CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2000, 46 (01) :61-75