Validation of a model for evaluating outcome after traumatic brain injury

被引:43
作者
Bush, BA
Novack, TA
Malec, JF
Stringer, AY
Millis, SR
Madan, A
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Psychiat & Behav Neurobiol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Psychol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] Mayo Med Ctr, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Emory Univ, Dept Rehabil Med, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[6] Kessler Med Rehabil Res & Educ Corp, Res Dept, W Orange, NJ USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2003年 / 84卷 / 12期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
brain injuries; outcome assessment (health care); rehabilitation; validation studies [publication type;
D O I
10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00367-8
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To validate a model that examines the contribution of premorbid variables, injury severity, and functional and cognitive status to outcome 1 year after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: Cross-validation study using a larger, national, prospective, longitudinal sample. Setting: Acute inpatient rehabilitation hospitals at Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems centers. Participants: Two sample populations followed through acute rehabilitation to 1 year after TBI. The original sample included 107 patients, and the cross-validation sample included 294 patients. Participants were predominately young men who had experienced moderate to severe TBI in motor vehicle crashes. Interventions: Acute medical and rehabilitation care. Main Outcome Measures: Disability Rating Scale, Community Integration Questionnaire, and return to employment. Results: Structural equation modeling was used to compare the fit of the data to a path analysis developed through clinical use and previous research. Both samples provided adequate goodness of fit, supporting the model's validity. Injury severity affected cognitive and functional status, and cognitive and functional status significantly influenced 1-year outcome. Premorbid factors and injury severity did not directly influence outcome. Conclusions: Both samples supported the proposed model, which was cross-validated. Injury severity indirectly influences outcome through its effects on cognitive and functional status. Although treatment to decrease injury severity is obviously important, concentrated rehabilitation interventions aimed at improving patients' cognitive and functional status may have a more significant impact on 1-year outcome and should be the focus of future research.
引用
收藏
页码:1803 / 1807
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Longitudinal Description of the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended for Individuals in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database: A National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study
    Pretz, Christopher R.
    Dams-O'Connor, Kristen
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 94 (12): : 2486 - 2493
  • [22] Test-Retest Reliability of Traumatic Brain Injury Outcome Measures: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study
    Bogner, Jennifer A.
    Whiteneck, Gale G.
    MacDonald, Jessica
    Juengst, Shannon B.
    Brown, Allen W.
    Philippus, Angela M.
    Marwitz, Jennifer H.
    Lengenfelder, Jeannie
    Mellick, Dave
    Arenth, Patricia
    Corrigan, John D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2017, 32 (05) : E1 - E16
  • [23] Effect of severity of post-traumatic confusion and its constituent symptoms on outcome after traumatic brain injury
    Sherer, Mark
    Yablon, Stuart A.
    Nakase-Richardson, Risa
    Nick, Todd G.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (01): : 42 - 47
  • [24] Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury
    Shukla, Dhaval
    Devi, B. Indira
    Agrawal, Amit
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 113 (06) : 435 - 441
  • [25] Age, symptoms, and functional outcome after mild traumatic brain injury
    Karr, Justin E.
    Luoto, Teemu M.
    Gilman, Isabelle G.
    Berghem, Ksenia
    Kotilainen, Anna-Kerttu
    Iverson, Grant L.
    [J]. ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 141 (02): : 183 - 190
  • [26] Outcome after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury: The role of dizziness
    Chamelian, L
    Feinstein, A
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 85 (10): : 1662 - 1666
  • [27] Sexual Functioning 1 Year After Traumatic Brain Injury: Findings From a Prospective Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Collaborative Study
    Sander, Angelle M.
    Maestas, Kacey Little
    Pappadis, Monique R.
    Sherer, Mark
    Hammond, Flora M.
    Hanks, Robin
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 93 (08): : 1331 - 1337
  • [28] Outcome after traumatic brain injury: Pathway analysis of contributions from premorbid, injury severity, and recovery variables
    Novack, TA
    Bush, BA
    Meythaler, JM
    Canupp, K
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (03): : 300 - 305
  • [29] Recovery of ambulation after traumatic brain injury
    Katz, DI
    White, DK
    Alexander, MP
    Klein, RB
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 85 (06): : 865 - 869
  • [30] Running abnormalities after traumatic brain injury
    Williams, Gavin
    Schache, Anthony
    Morris, Meg E.
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2013, 27 (04) : 434 - 443