Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms

被引:90
作者
Li, H [1 ]
Giger, ML [1 ]
Olopade, OI [1 ]
Margolis, A [1 ]
Chinander, MR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
mammographic parenchymal patterns; breast cancer risk; computerized texture analysis; image analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2005.03.069
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. Mammographic density and parenchymal patterns have been shown to be related to the risk of developing breast cancer. Thus, computerized texture analysis of breast parenchymal patterns on mammograms may be useful in assessing breast cancer risk. Materials and Methods. A comparative evaluation was conducted of various computer-extracted texture features of mammographic parenchymal patterns of women with BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations and those of women at low risk of developing breast cancer. Mammograms from 172 subjects (30 women with either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation and 142 low-risk women) were analyzed. Computerized texture features were extracted from regions-of-interest to assess the mammographic parenchymal patterns in the images. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the performance of these features in the task of distinguishing between the two groups of women. Results. Quantitative texture analysis on digitized mammograms demonstrated that gene-mutation carriers and low-risk women have different mammographic parenchymal patterns. Gene-mutation carriers presented with parenchymal patterns that were denser, coarser, and lower in contrast than those of the low-risk group. For the gene-mutation carriers, their mammographic patterns appear to contain less high-frequency component as indicated by higher coarseness values, lower fractal dimensions, and smaller edge gradients, which yielded corresponding A(z) values of 0.79, 0.84, and 0.78, respectively, in the task of distinguishing between gene-mutation carriers and the low-risk group with the entire dataset. The contrast measure calculated from co-occurrence matrix method, which describes local image variation, yielded an Az value of 0.86 in distinguishing between the two groups of women. Conclusion. Computerized texture analysis of mammograms provides radiographic descriptors of mammographic parenchymal patterns. The computer-extracted features may be useful for identifying women at high risk for breast cancer and for monitoring the treatment of breast cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 873
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[21]  
Hays W., 1994, Statistics
[22]   Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography part 1. Tissue and related risk factors [J].
Heine, JJ ;
Malhotra, P .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (03) :298-316
[23]   Comparison of automated and visual texture analysis in MRI: Characterization of normal and diseased skeletal muscle [J].
Herlidou, S ;
Rolland, Y ;
Bansard, JY ;
Le Rumeur, E ;
de Certaines, JD .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1999, 17 (09) :1393-1397
[24]   Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers [J].
Huo, ZM ;
Giger, ML ;
Olopade, OI ;
Wolverton, DE ;
Weber, BL ;
Metz, CE ;
Zhong, WM ;
Cummings, SA .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (02) :519-526
[25]   Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: Feature selection [J].
Huo, ZM ;
Giger, ML ;
Wolverton, DE ;
Zhong, WM ;
Cumming, S ;
Olopade, OI .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (01) :4-12
[26]   Mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk of breast cancer at and after a prevalence screen in Singaporean women [J].
Jakes, RW ;
Duffy, SW ;
Ng, FC ;
Gao, F ;
Ng, EH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (01) :11-19
[27]   Cancer statistics, 2004 [J].
Jemal, A ;
Tiwari, RC ;
Murray, T ;
Ghafoor, A ;
Samuels, A ;
Ward, E ;
Feuer, EJ ;
Thun, MJ .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2004, 54 (01) :8-29
[28]   Characterization of bone quality using computer-extracted radiographic features [J].
Jiang, CS ;
Giger, ML ;
Chinander, MR ;
Martell, JM ;
Kwak, S ;
Favus, MJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (06) :872-879
[29]   INABILITY OF HUMANS TO DISCRIMINATE BETWEEN VISUAL TEXTURES THAT AGREE IN SECOND-ORDER STATISTICS - REVISITED [J].
JULESZ, B ;
GILBERT, EN ;
SHEPP, LA ;
FRISCH, HL .
PERCEPTION, 1973, 2 (04) :391-405
[30]   IMAGE FEATURE ANALYSIS AND COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY - DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG-DISEASE IN DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHS [J].
KATSURAGAWA, S ;
DOI, K ;
MACMAHON, H .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1988, 15 (03) :311-319