Should Obesity Be Considered a Contraindication for Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction?

被引:28
作者
Banuelos, Joseph [1 ]
Abu-Ghname, Amjed [1 ]
Vyas, Krishna [1 ]
Sharaf, Basel [1 ]
Nguyen, Minh-Doan T. [1 ]
Harless, Christin [1 ]
Manrique, Oscar J. [1 ]
Martinez-Jorge, Jorys [1 ]
Tran, Nho, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Plast Surg, Dept Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
NIPPLE-SPARING MASTECTOMY; ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; BODY-MASS INDEX; TISSUE EXPANDER; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000006540
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Prepectoral implant-based reconstruction reemerged as a viable approach following recent advances in reconstructive techniques and technology. To achieve successful outcomes, careful patient selection is critical. Obesity increases the risk of complications and has been suggested as a relative contraindication for prepectoral breast reconstruction. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent immediate two-stage implant-based reconstruction at the authors' institution was performed. Only women having a body mass index of 30 kg/m(2) or greater were included. Patient demographics, operative details, and surgical outcomes of prepectoral and subpectoral reconstruction were compared. Results: One hundred ten patients (189 breasts) who underwent prepectoral and 83 (147 breasts) who underwent subpectoral reconstruction were included. Complications were comparable between the two groups. Twelve devices (6.4 percent), including implants and tissue expanders, required explantation in the prepectoral group, and 12 devices (8.2 percent) required explantation in the subpectoral group (p =0.522). Final implant-based reconstruction was achieved in 180 breasts (95.2 percent) in the prepectoral group and 141 breasts (95.9 percent) in the subpectoral group. Regardless of type of reconstruction (prepectoral or subpectoral), for each point increase in body mass index, the odds of complications and device explantation increased by 3.4 percent and 8.6 percent, respectively; and the optimal cutoff to predict higher complications and explantation rates was a body mass index of 34.8 kg/m(2) and 34.1 kg/m(2), respectively. Conclusions: Obesity increases complications and failure rates in a positive correlation; however, complications and final reconstruction rates are comparable between the prepectoral and subpectoral groups. The authors believe that obesity should not be a contraindication for prepectoral breast reconstruction but that care should be taken in patients with a body mass index above 35 kg/m(2).
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 627
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   A Paradigm Shift in US Breast Reconstruction: Increasing Implant Rates [J].
Albornoz, Claudia R. ;
Bach, Peter B. ;
Mehrara, Babak J. ;
Disa, Joseph J. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
McCarthy, Colleen M. ;
Cordeiro, Peter G. ;
Matros, Evan .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (01) :15-23
[2]   Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: Two-year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study [J].
Alderman, AK ;
Wilkins, EG ;
Kim, HM ;
Lowery, JC .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 109 (07) :2265-2274
[3]   BREAST RECONSTRUCTION WITH A SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE EXPANDER FOLLOWED WITH A POLYURETHANE-COVERED SILICONE BREAST IMPLANT [J].
ARTZ, JS ;
DINNER, MI ;
SAMPLINER, J .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1988, 20 (06) :517-521
[4]   A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction [J].
Baker, Benjamin G. ;
Irri, Renu ;
Chattopadhyay, Vivienne MacCallum Rahul ;
Murphy, John ;
Harvey, James R. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 141 (05) :1077-1084
[5]   Immediate Implant-based Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Using a Vertical Incision [J].
Hilton, Becker ;
Lind, Jeffrey G., II ;
Hopkins, Elizabeth G. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2015, 3 (06)
[6]   Evaluation of a novel breast reconstruction technique using the Braxon® acellular dermal matrix: a new muscle-sparing breast reconstruction [J].
Berna, Giorgio ;
Cawthorn, Simon J. ;
Papaccio, Guido ;
Balestrieri, Nicola .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 87 (06) :493-498
[7]   TiLoop® Bra mesh used for immediate breast reconstruction: comparison of retropectoral and subcutaneous implant placement in a prospective single-institution series [J].
Casella D. ;
Bernini M. ;
Bencini L. ;
Roselli J. ;
Lacaria M.T. ;
Martellucci J. ;
Banfi R. ;
Calabrese C. ;
Orzalesi L. .
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2014, 37 (11) :599-604
[8]   Early assessment of post-surgical outcomes with pre-pectoral breast reconstruction: A literature review and meta-analysis [J].
Chatterjee, Abhishek ;
Nahabedian, Maurice Y. ;
Gabriel, Allen ;
Macarios, David ;
Parekh, Mousam ;
Wang, Fang ;
Griffin, Leah ;
Sigalove, Steven .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 117 (06) :1119-1130
[9]   The Impact of Obesity on Breast Surgery Complications [J].
Chen, Catherine L. ;
Shore, Andrew D. ;
Johns, Roger ;
Clark, Jeanne M. ;
Manahan, Michele ;
Makary, Martin A. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (05) :395E-402E
[10]   Treatment of Capsular Contracture Using Complete Implant Coverage by Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Novel Technique [J].
Cheng, Angela ;
Lakhiani, Chrisovalantis ;
Saint-Cyr, Michel .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (03) :519-529