The Baltimore HEARS Pilot Study: An Affordable, Accessible, Community-Delivered Hearing Care Intervention

被引:48
作者
Nieman, Carrie L. [1 ,2 ]
Marrone, Nicole [3 ]
Mamo, Sara K. [1 ,2 ]
Betz, Joshua [2 ,4 ]
Choi, Janet S. [1 ,2 ]
Contrera, Kevin J. [1 ,2 ]
Thorpe, Roland J., Jr. [2 ]
Gitlin, Laura N. [5 ,6 ]
Tanner, Elizabeth K. [2 ,5 ]
Han, Hae-Ra [5 ]
Szanton, Sarah L. [2 ,5 ,7 ]
Lin, Frank R. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol HNS, 601 N Caroline St,6th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Johns Hopkins Ctr Aging & Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Sch Nursing, Dept Community Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Sch Nursing, Ctr Innovat Care Aging, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Hearing loss; Age-related hearing loss; Hearing health care; Disparities; Minority health; Community engagement; Intervention development; Implementation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OLDER-ADULTS; DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS; AUDIOLOGICAL REHABILITATION; SIGNIFICANT OTHERS; EDUCATION-PROGRAM; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; AID USE; HEALTH; IMPAIRMENT;
D O I
10.1093/geront/gnw153
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Age-related hearing loss negatively affects health outcomes, yet disparities in hearing care, such as hearing aid use, exist based on race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position. Recent national efforts highlight reduction of hearing care disparities as a public health imperative. This study a) describes a community engagement approach to addressing disparities, b) reports preliminary outcomes of a novel intervention, and c) discusses implementation processes and potential for wide-scale testing and use. This was a prospective, randomized control pilot, with a 3-month delayed treatment group as a waitlist control, that assessed feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a community-delivered, affordable, and accessible intervention for older adults with hearing loss. Outcomes were assessed at 3 months, comparing immediate and delayed groups, and pooled to compare the cohort's pre- and 3-month post-intervention results. All participants completed the study (n = 15). The program was highly acceptable: 93% benefited, 100% would recommend the program, and 67% wanted to serve as future program trainers. At 3 months, the treated group (n = 8) experienced fewer social and emotional effects of hearing loss and fewer depressive symptoms as compared to the delayed treatment group (n = 7). Pooling 3-month post-intervention scores (n = 15), participants reported fewer negative hearing-related effects (effect size = -0.96) and reduced depressive symptoms (effect size = -0.43). The HEARS (Hearing Equality through Accessible Research & Solutions) intervention is feasible, acceptable, low risk, and demonstrates preliminary efficacy. HEARS offers a novel, low-cost, and readily scalable solution to reduce hearing care disparities and highlights how a community-engaged approach to intervention development can address disparities.
引用
收藏
页码:1173 / 1186
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [11] Policy Solutions for Better Hearing
    Cassel, Christine
    Penhoet, Ed
    Saunders, Robert
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (06): : 553 - 554
  • [12] Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: a systematic review of health promotion interventions
    Cattan, M
    White, M
    Bond, J
    Learmouth, A
    [J]. AGEING & SOCIETY, 2005, 25 : 41 - 67
  • [13] Prevalence of Hearing Aid Use Among Older Adults in the United States
    Chien, Wade
    Lin, Frank R.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 172 (03) : 292 - 293
  • [14] A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: Final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force on the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults
    Chisolm, Theresa Hnath
    Johnson, Carole E.
    Danhauer, Jeffrey L.
    Portz, Laural J. P.
    Abrams, Harvey B.
    Lesner, Sharon
    McCarthy, Patricia A.
    Newman, Craig W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2007, 18 (02) : 151 - 183
  • [15] Cox Robyn M, 2003, J Am Acad Audiol, V14, P403
  • [16] The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults
    Dalton, DS
    Cruickshanks, KJ
    Klein, BEK
    Klein, R
    Wiley, TL
    Nondahl, DM
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2003, 43 (05) : 661 - 668
  • [17] Predictors of Older Adults' Technology Use and Its Relationship to Depressive Symptoms and Well-being
    Elliot, Ari J.
    Mooney, Christopher J.
    Douthit, Kathryn Z.
    Lynch, Martin F.
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2014, 69 (05): : 667 - 677
  • [18] Fisk A.D., 2009, DESIGNING OLDER ADUL
  • [19] Auditory threshold, phonologic demand, and incident dementia
    Gallacher, John
    Ilubaera, Victor
    Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
    Bayer, Antony
    Fish, Mark
    Babisch, Wolfgang
    Elwood, Peter
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2012, 79 (15) : 1583 - 1590
  • [20] Association of Hearing Loss With Hospitalization and Burden of Disease in Older Adults
    Genther, Dane J.
    Frick, Kevin D.
    Chen, David
    Betz, Joshua
    Lin, Frank R.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 309 (22): : 2322 - 2324