Antibiotic prophylaxis based on individual infective risk stratification in cardiac implantable electronic device: the PRACTICE study

被引:16
|
作者
Malagu, Michele [1 ]
Vitali, Francesco [1 ]
Brieda, Alessandro [1 ]
Cimaglia, Paolo [1 ]
De Raffele, Martina [1 ]
Tazzari, Enea [1 ]
Musolino, Cristina [1 ]
Balla, Cristina [1 ]
Serenelli, Matteo [1 ]
Cultrera, Rosario [2 ]
Rapezzi, Claudio [1 ]
Bertini, Matteo [1 ]
机构
[1] S Anna Univ Hosp, Cardiol Ctr, Via Aldo Moro 8, I-44124 Cona Ferrara, Italy
[2] S Anna Univ Hosp, Infect Dis Unit, Ferrara, Italy
来源
EUROPACE | 2022年 / 24卷 / 03期
关键词
Cardiac implantable electronic device; Infection; Antibiotic prophylaxis; Pacemaker; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Shariff score; PREVENTION; PACEMAKER; BIOFILM; RATES; MICROBIOLOGY; PATHOGENESIS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euab222
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims In patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) intervention, routine pre-procedure antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended. A more powerful antibiotic protocol has been suggested in patients at high risk of infection. Stratification of individual infective risk could guide the prophylaxis before CIED procedure. Methods and results Patients undergoing CIED surgery were stratified according to the Shariff score in low and high infective risk. Patients in the 'low-risk' group were treated with only two antibiotic administrations while patients in the 'high-risk' group were treated with a prolonged 9-day protocol, according to renal function and allergies. We followed-up patients for 250 days with clinical outpatient visit and electronic control of the CIED. As primary endpoint, we evaluated CIED-related infections. A total of 937 consecutive patients were enrolled, of whom 735 were stratified in the 'low-risk' group and 202 in the 'high-risk' group. Despite different risk profiles, CIED-related infection rate at 250 days was similar in the two groups (8/735 in 'low risk' vs. 4/202 in 'high risk', P = 0.32). At multivariate analysis, active neoplasia, haematoma, and reintervention were independently associated with CIED-related infection (HR 5.54, 10.77, and 12.15, respectively). Conclusion In a large cohort of patients undergoing CIED procedure, an antibiotic prophylaxis based on individual stratification of infective risk resulted in similar rate of infection between groups at high and low risk of CIED-related infection.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 420
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Infective endocarditis and risk of death after cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: a nationwide cohort study
    Ozcan, Cengiz
    Raunso, Jakob
    Lamberts, Morten
    Kober, Lars
    Lindhardt, Tommi Bo
    Bruun, Niels Eske
    Laursen, Marie Louise
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    Gislason, Gunnar Hilmar
    Hansen, Morten Lock
    EUROPACE, 2017, 19 (06): : 1007 - 1014
  • [2] Epidemiology of cardiac implantable electronic device infections: incidence and risk factors
    Han, Hui-Chen
    Hawkins, Nathaniel M.
    Pearman, Charles M.
    Birnie, David H.
    Krahn, Andrew D.
    EUROPACE, 2021, 23 : 3 - 10
  • [3] Risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device infections: a nationwide Danish study
    Olsen, Thomas
    Jorgensen, Ole Dan
    Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
    Thogersen, Anna Margrethe
    Philbert, Berit Thornvig
    Frausing, Maria Hee Jung Park
    Sandgaard, Niels Christian Foldager
    Johansen, Jens Brock
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (47) : 4946 - +
  • [4] Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of cardiac implantable electronic device infection
    Madadi, Shabnam
    Kafi, Mohammad
    Kheirkhah, Jalal
    Azhari, Amir
    Kiarsi, Mohammadreza
    Mehryar, Alireza
    Fazelifar, Amirfarjam
    Alizadehdiz, Abolfath
    Emkanjoo, Zahra
    Haghjoo, Majid
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (02): : 161 - 165
  • [5] Infective endocarditis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a nationwide study
    Mateos Gaitan, Roberto
    Boix-Palop, Lucia
    Munoz Garcia, Patricia
    Mestres, Carlos A.
    Marin Arriaza, Mercedes
    Pedraz Prieto, Alvaro
    de Alarcon Gonzalez, Aristides
    Gutierrez Carretero, Encarnacion
    Hernandez Meneses, Marta
    Goenaga Sanchez, Miguel Angel
    Cobo Belaustegui, Manuel
    Oteo Revuelta, Jose Antonio
    Gainzarain Arana, Juan Carlos
    Garcia Vazquez, Elisa
    Martinez-Selles, Manuel
    EUROPACE, 2020, 22 (07): : 1062 - 1070
  • [6] Survey of antibiotic prophylaxis for implantable cardiac electronic device (ICED) insertion in England
    Lowe, Emma
    Tayebjee, Muzahir H.
    Pratty, Jyoshna
    Sandoe, Jonathan A. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 157 (02) : 286 - 287
  • [7] Prevention of cardiac implantable electronic device infections: guidelines and conventional prophylaxis
    Blomstrom-Lundqvist, Carina
    Ostrowska, Bozena
    EUROPACE, 2021, 23 : 11 - 19
  • [8] Outcomes in patients with definite and possible infective endocarditis related to a cardiac implantable electronic device
    Polewczyk, Anna
    Jachec, Wojciech
    Polewczyk, Maciej
    Nowosielecka, Dorota
    Brzozowski, Wojciech
    Kutarski, Andrzej
    POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE-POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ, 2024, 134 (7-8):
  • [9] Risk Scores for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection: Which One to Believe In?
    Malagu, Michele
    Donazzan, Luca
    Capanni, Andrea
    Sirugo, Paolo
    Rapezzi, Claudio
    Bertini, Matteo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (21)
  • [10] Cardiac surgery in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices and risk of device infections: a nationwide nested case–control study
    Maria Hee Jung Park Frausing
    Jens Cosedis Nielsen
    Jens Brock Johansen
    Ole Dan Jørgensen
    Thomas Olsen
    Jens Kristensen
    Christian Gerdes
    Mads Brix Kronborg
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2023, 66 : 897 - 904