Tailored Screening for Late-Life Depression: A Short Version of the Teate Depression Inventory (TDI-E)

被引:8
作者
Balsamo, Michela [1 ]
Saggino, Aristide [1 ]
Carlucci, Leonardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ G Annunzio Chieti & Pescara, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Chieti, Italy
关键词
depression; elderly; late-life; adults; Rasch analysis; item response theory;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02693
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A number of assessment instruments have been developed as efficacy measures of geriatric depression in clinical trials but most showed several weaknesses, such as time-consuming administration, development and validation in younger populations, and lack of discrimination between anxiety and depression. Among the extant self-report measures of depression, the 21-item Teate Depression Inventory (TDI; Balsamo and Saggino, 2013), developed via Rasch analysis, showed a satisfactory level of diagnostic accuracy, and allowed the reduction of false positives in test scoring in adult population. The present study explored the potential improvement in the psychometric performance of the TDI in the elderly by item refinement through Rasch analysis in a sample of 836 elderly people (49.5% males; mean age = 73.28; SD = 6.56). A resulting shorter version was composed of the best-fitting and discriminative nine items from the full form. The Teate Depression Inventory (TDI-E) (E for elderly) presented good internal construct validity, with unidimensional structure, local dependency, good reliability (person separation index and Cronbach's alpha), and no signs of differential item functioning or measurement bias due to gender and age (65 vs. 75+ years). Cut-off points and normative data provided could enhance the clinical usefulness of the TDI-E, which seems to be a promising valid and reliable tool for the screening of geriatric depression, with less risk of finding false positives due to overlapping of depression in elderly with other comorbid conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 135 条
[1]   Why is depression more prevalent in women? [J].
Albert, Paul R. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 40 (04) :219-221
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
[3]  
Andersen P.A., 1999, NONVERBAL COMMUNICAT
[4]  
Andiel C., 1995, CAN J REHABIL, V9, P17
[5]   Controversy and the Rasch model - A characteristic of incompatible paradigms? [J].
Andrich, D .
MEDICAL CARE, 2004, 42 (01) :7-16
[6]  
Andrich D., 2019, A Course in Rasch Measurement Theory: Measuring in the Educational, Social and Health Sciences, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-7496-8, 10.1007/978-981-13-7496-8]
[7]  
Andrich D., 2010, RUMM 2030
[8]  
Andrich D., 1982, ED RES PERSPECTIVES, V9, P95
[9]  
Andrich D., 1988, RASCH MODELS MEASURE
[10]  
Andrich D, 2011, EXPERT REV PHARM OUT, V11, P571, DOI [10.1586/erp.11.59, 10.1586/ERP.11.59]