Implementation of technology-supported personalized learning-its impact on instructional quality

被引:29
作者
Schmid, Regina [1 ]
Pauli, Christine [2 ]
Stebler, Rita [3 ]
Reusser, Kurt [3 ]
Petko, Dominik [3 ]
机构
[1] Schwyz Univ Teacher Educ, Zaystr 42, CH-6410 Goldau, Switzerland
[2] Univ Fribourg, Ctr Teacher Educ, Fribourg, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Inst Educ, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Instructional quality; personalized learning; student-centered perspective; technology; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS; TEACHERS PEDAGOGICAL BELIEFS; EDUCATIONAL-TECHNOLOGY; CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT; STUDENT; PERFORMANCE; DIMENSIONS; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/00220671.2022.2089086
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Digital technology especially raised hopes to open up new possibilities to personalize learning. Although various schools have implemented approaches of technology-supported personalized learning, the impact on instructional quality remains unclear. As a common definition of the multilayered construct personalized learning is lacking, our study focuses on two theoretical dimensions of technology-supported personalized learning to investigate the impact on instructional quality. For this purpose, our study has analyzed data from a survey of N = 860 students (8(th) grade) from 31 Swiss schools with personalized learning concepts. Results show that student-centered teaching methods in the context of technology-supported personalized learning stimulate the cognitive activation of the students, and the supportive climate increases slightly with a higher degree of students' voice and choice on the computer.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 198
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
[71]  
Stebler R., 2018, Zeitschrift fur Padagogik, V64, P159
[72]   Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: A reply to commentaries [J].
Sweller, John ;
Kirschner, Paul A. ;
Clark, Richard E. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2007, 42 (02) :115-121
[73]   Understanding the relationship between teachers' pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence [J].
Tondeur, Jo ;
van Braak, Johan ;
Ertmer, Peggy A. ;
Ottenbreit-Leftwich, Anne .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 65 (03) :555-575
[74]  
Underwood J., 2007, Impact 2007: Personalising Learning with Technology
[75]   An overview of 25 years of research on digital personalised learning in primary and secondary education: A systematic review of conceptual and methodological trends [J].
Van Schoors, Rani ;
Elen, Jan ;
Raes, Annelies ;
Depaepe, Fien .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 52 (05) :1798-1822
[76]   Personalization of Instruction: Design Dimensions and Implications for Cognition [J].
Walkington, Candace ;
Bernacki, Matthew L. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2018, 86 (01) :50-68
[77]   Using Adaptive Learning Technologies to Personalize Instruction to Student Interests: The Impact of Relevant Contexts on Performance and Learning Outcomes [J].
Walkington, Candace A. .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 105 (04) :932-945
[78]  
Watson WR, 2017, INSTRUCTIONAL-DESIGN THEORIES AND MODELS, VOL IV: THE LEARNER-CENTERED PARADIGM OF EDUCATION, P93
[79]   Understanding the implementation of personalized learning: A research synthesis [J].
Zhang, Ling ;
Basham, James D. ;
Yang, Sohyun .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2020, 31
[80]   Personalized learning and ESSA: What we know and where we go [J].
Zhang, Ling ;
Yang, Sohyun ;
Carter, Richard Allen, Jr. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2020, 52 (03) :253-274