Collection of ambient particulate matter by porous vegetation barriers: Sampling and characterization methods

被引:39
作者
Tiwary, Abhishek [1 ]
Reff, Adam [2 ]
Colls, Jeremy J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Chem & Analyt Sci, Environm Sustainable Technol Div, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
[2] US EPA, Atmospher Modeling Div, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[3] Univ Nottingham, Agr & Environm Sci Div, Sch Biosci, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
ambient particulate matter; functional groups; filtration efficiency; vegetative barriers; FTIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.09.011
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Sampling and characterization methods for assessing the effect of vegetative barriers on particulate matter (PM10) concentrations and functional group composition were developed and applied in a case study. Ambient PM10 was concurrently sampled upwind and downwind of a hawthorn hedge at a rural location in the UK. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of PM10 samples were collected to characterize the functional group composition. Absorbances associated with sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, aliphatic carbon-hydrogen, and carbonyl functional groups were observed in the FTIR spectra. Calculations with gravimetric measurements show that the hedge collects PM10 mass with a collection efficiency of 34% on average. FTIR results suggest that individual functional groups might exhibit different behavior in the hedge, but further method development and sampling is necessary to calculate functional group results with more confidence. Current results show the potential of using hedges to mitigate ambient concentrations of airborne PM10, and applying these methods to a more statistically robust sample size is anticipated to aid in elucidating physico-chemical mechanisms driving collection of PM10 by hedge elements. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 47
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   FOURIER-TRANSFORM INFRARED-SPECTROSCOPY OF AEROSOL COLLECTED IN A LOW-PRESSURE IMPACTOR (LPI/FTIR) - METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND FIELD CALIBRATION [J].
ALLEN, DT ;
PALEN, EJ ;
HAIMOV, MI ;
HERING, SV ;
YOUNG, JR .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 21 (04) :325-342
[2]  
APIEZON, 2005, APIEZON AP100 TECHNI
[3]   Secondary formation and the Smoky Mountain organic aerosol: An examination of aerosol polarity and functional group composition during SEAVS [J].
Blando, JD ;
Porcja, RJ ;
Li, TH ;
Bowman, D ;
Lioy, PJ ;
Turpin, BJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 32 (05) :604-613
[4]   Design of a cost-effective weighing facility for PM2.5 quality assurance [J].
Carlton, AG ;
Teitz, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2002, 52 (05) :506-510
[5]   Microanalysis methods for characterization of personal aerosol exposures [J].
Carlton, AG ;
Turpin, BJ ;
Johnson, W ;
Buckley, BT ;
Simcik, M ;
Eisenreich, SJ ;
Porcja, RJ .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 31 (01) :66-80
[6]   Field evaluation of windbreak protection for orchards [J].
Dierickx, W .
BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2003, 84 (02) :159-170
[7]  
Erisman J. W., 1989, AMMONIA EMISSIONS NE
[8]   EFFECTS OF ATMOSPHERIC AMMONIA ON VEGETATION - A REVIEW [J].
FANGMEIER, A ;
HADWIGERFANGMEIER, A ;
VANDEREERDEN, L ;
JAGER, HJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 1994, 86 (01) :43-82
[9]   Size distributions of organonitrates in ambient aerosol collected in Houston, Texas [J].
Garnes, LA ;
Allen, DT .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 36 (10) :983-992
[10]   Major component composition of PM10 and PM2.5 from roadside and urban background sites [J].
Harrison, RM ;
Jones, AM ;
Lawrence, RG .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (27) :4531-4538