Managing Process Model Complexity via Concrete Syntax Modifications

被引:79
作者
La Rosa, Marcello [1 ]
ter Hofstede, Arthur H. M. [1 ,2 ]
Wohed, Petia [3 ]
Reijers, Hajo A. [2 ]
Mendling, Jan [4 ]
van der Aalst, Wil M. P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Stockholm Univ, S-16440 Kista, Sweden
[4] Humboldt Univ, D-10178 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Complexity; pattern; presentation; process model; secondary notation; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1109/TII.2011.2124467
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
While Business Process Management (BPM) is an established discipline, the increased adoption of BPM technology in recent years has introduced new challenges. One challenge concerns dealing with the ever-growing complexity of business process models. Mechanisms for dealing with this complexity can be classified into two categories: 1) those that are solely concerned with the visual representation of the model and 2) those that change its inner structure. While significant attention is paid to the latter category in the BPM literature, this paper focuses on the former category. It presents a collection of patterns that generalize and conceptualize various existing mechanisms to change the visual representation of a process model. Next, it provides a detailed analysis of the degree of support for these patterns in a number of state-of-the-art languages and tools. This paper concludes with the results of a usability evaluation of the patterns conducted with BPM practitioners.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 265
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[21]   Reducing the Cognitive Complexity of Business Process Models [J].
Gruhn, Volker ;
Laue, Ralf .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE INFORMATICS, 2009, :339-345
[22]  
Gunther CW, 2007, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4714, P328
[23]   Improving graphical information system model use with elision and connecting lines [J].
Huotari, Jouni ;
Lyytinen, Kalle ;
Niemelä, Marketta .
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2004, 11 (01) :26-58
[24]  
JENSEN K, 1996, EATCS MONOGRAPHS THE
[25]  
KELLER G, 1992, SEMANTISCHE PROCESSM
[26]  
Kitzmann Ingo, 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing, P391, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2009.28
[27]  
KNOPFEL A, 2006, FUNDAMENTAL MODELING
[28]  
Koffka K., 1955, Principles of Gestalt psychology
[29]   Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework [J].
Krogstie, J ;
Sindre, G ;
Jorgensen, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2006, 15 (01) :91-102
[30]  
Krogstie John., 1995, Information System Concepts, P216