Hydroclimatic projections for the Murray-Darling Basin based on an ensemble derived from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AR4 climate models

被引:92
作者
Sun, Fubao [1 ]
Roderick, Michael L. [1 ,2 ]
Lim, Wee Ho [1 ]
Farquhar, Graham D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Biol, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Earth Sci, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1029/2010WR009829
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We assess hydroclimatic projections for the Murray-Darling Basin (MDB) using an ensemble of 39 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AR4 climate model runs based on the A1B emissions scenario. The raw model output for precipitation, P, was adjusted using a quantile-based bias correction approach. We found that the projected change, Delta P, between two 30 year periods (2070-2099 less 1970-1999) was little affected by bias correction. The range for Delta P among models was large (similar to +/- 150 mm yr(-1)) with all-model run and all-model ensemble averages (4.9 and -8.1 mm yr(-1)) near zero, against a background climatological P of similar to 500 mm yr(-1). We found that the time series of actually observed annual P over the MDB was indistinguishable from that generated by a purely random process. Importantly, nearly all the model runs showed similar behavior. We used these facts to develop a new approach to understanding variability in projections of Delta P. By plotting Delta P versus the variance of the time series, we could easily identify model runs with projections for Delta P that were beyond the bounds expected from purely random variations. For the MDB, we anticipate that a purely random process could lead to differences of +/- 57 mm yr-1 (95% confidence) between successive 30 year periods. This is equivalent to +/- 11% of the climatological P and translates into variations in runoff of around +/- 29%. This sets a baseline for gauging modeled and/or observed changes.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Brockwell P. J., 1991, TIME SERIES THEORY M
[2]   Estimating climate change impact on runoff across southeast Australia: Method, results, and implications of the modeling method [J].
Chiew, F. H. S. ;
Teng, J. ;
Vaze, J. ;
Post, D. A. ;
Perraud, J. M. ;
Kirono, D. G. C. ;
Viney, N. R. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2009, 45
[3]   Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling [J].
Fowler, H. J. ;
Blenkinsop, S. ;
Tebaldi, C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2007, 27 (12) :1547-1578
[4]   Developing and applying uncertain global climate change projections for regional water management planning [J].
Groves, David G. ;
Yates, David ;
Tebaldi, Claudia .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44 (12)
[5]   Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming [J].
Held, Isaac M. ;
Soden, Brian J. .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (21) :5686-5699
[6]  
IPCC, 2000, SPEC REP EM SCEN
[7]   Measurement of GCM Skill in Predicting Variables Relevant for Hydroclimatological Assessments [J].
Johnson, Fiona ;
Sharma, Ashish .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2009, 22 (16) :4373-4382
[8]   Challenges in Combining Projections from Multiple Climate Models [J].
Knutti, Reto ;
Furrer, Reinhard ;
Tebaldi, Claudia ;
Cermak, Jan ;
Meehl, Gerald A. .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2010, 23 (10) :2739-2758
[9]   Bias correction of monthly precipitation and temperature fields from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AR4 models using equidistant quantile matching [J].
Li, Haibin ;
Sheffield, Justin ;
Wood, Eric F. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2010, 115
[10]  
Lim WH, 2009, ATLAS OF THE GLOBAL WATER CYCLE: BASED ON THE IPCC AR4 CLIMATE MODELS, P1