Acute pulmonary embolism in patients presenting pulmonary deterioration after hospitalisation for non-critical COVID-19

被引:8
|
作者
Friz, Hernan Polo [1 ]
Gelfi, Elia [1 ]
Orenti, Annalisa [4 ]
Motto, Elena [1 ]
Primitz, Laura [1 ]
Donzelli, Tino [1 ]
Intotero, Marcello [2 ]
Scarpazza, Paolo [3 ]
Vighi, Giuseppe [1 ]
Cimminiello, Claudio [5 ]
Boracchi, Patrizia [4 ]
机构
[1] ASST Vimercate, Internal Med, Med Dept, Vimercate Hosp, Vimercate, Italy
[2] ASST Vimercate, Diagnost Dept, Radiol, Vimercate Hosp, Vimercate, Italy
[3] ASST Vimercate, Med Dept, Pulmonol, Vimercate Hosp, Vimercate, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Clin Sci & Community Hlth, Lab Med Stat Epidemiol & Biometry GA Maccacaro, Milan, Italy
[5] Italian Soc Angiol & Vasc Pathol, SIAPAV, Res & Study Ctr, Milan, Italy
关键词
COVID-19; venous thromboembolism; pulmonary embolism; d-dimer; CT angiography; RISK; RULE;
D O I
10.1111/imj.15307
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Emerging evidence suggests an association between COVID-19 and acute pulmonary embolism (APE). Aims To assess the prevalence of APE in patients hospitalised for non-critical COVID-19 who presented clinical deterioration, and to investigate the association of clinical and biochemical variables with a confirmed diagnosis of APE in these subjects. Methods All consecutive patients admitted to the internal medicine department of a general hospital with a diagnosis of non-critical COVID-19, who performed a computer tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for respiratory deterioration in April 2020, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Results Study populations: 41 subjects, median (interquartile range) age: 71.7 (63-76) years, CPTA confirmed APE = 8 (19.51%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.82-34.87%). Among patients with and without APE, no significant differences were found with regards symptoms, comorbidities, treatment, Wells score and outcomes. The optimal cut-off value of d-dimer for predicting APE was 2454 ng/mL, sensitivity (95% CI): 63 (24-91), specificity: 73 (54-87), positive predictive value: 36 (13-65), negative predictive value: 89 (71-98) and AUC: 0.62 (0.38-0.85). The standard and age-adjusted d-dimer cut-offs, and the Wells score >= 2 did not associate with confirmed APE, albeit a cut-off value of d-dimer = 2454 ng/mL showed an relative risk: 3.21; 95% CI: 0.92-13.97; P = 0.073. Heparin at anticoagulant doses was used in 70.73% of patients before performing CTPA. Conclusion Among patients presenting pulmonary deterioration after hospitalisation for non-critical COVID-19, the prevalence of APE is high. Traditional diagnostic tools to identify high APE pre-test probability patients do not seem to be clinically useful. These results support the use of a high index of suspicion for performing CTPA to exclude or confirm APE as the most appropriate diagnostic approach in this clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1236 / 1242
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predictors and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism in COVID-19; insights from US National COVID cohort collaborative
    Gul, Muhammad H. H.
    Htun, Zin Mar
    Perez, Vinicio de Jesus
    Suleman, Muhammad
    Arshad, Samiullah
    Imran, Muhammad
    Vyasabattu, Mahender
    Wood, Jeremy P. P.
    Anstead, Michael
    Morris, Peter E. E.
    RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [42] A comparison of pulmonary embolism in pediatric and adult patients with acute COVID-19
    Hodes, Aaron D.
    Villasana-Gomez, Geraldine
    Traube, Leah
    Kurian, Jessica
    Liszewski, Mark C.
    Lazarus, Matthew S.
    Levin, Terry L.
    Blumfield, Einat
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2022, 85 : 10 - 13
  • [43] Pulmonary embolism or COVID-19 pneumonia? A case report
    Borna, Nahid
    Niksolat, Maryam
    Shariati, Behnam
    Saeedi, Vahid
    Kamalzadeh, Leila
    RESPIROLOGY CASE REPORTS, 2023, 11 (04):
  • [44] Pulmonary embolism in COVID-19, risk factors and association with inflammatory biomarkers
    Yousaf, Muhammad
    Thomas, Merlin Marry
    Almughalles, Salah
    Hameed, Mansoor Ali
    Alharafsheh, Ahmad
    Varikkodan, Irfan
    Waseem, Ali
    Babikir, Mona
    Chengamaraju, Dinesh
    Khatib, Mohamad Yahya
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (07) : E32887
  • [45] The prevalence of pulmonary embolism among COVID-19 patients underwent CT pulmonary angiography
    Kajoak, Samih
    Osman, Hamid
    Elnour, Hanan
    Elzaki, Amin
    Alghamdi, Ahmad Joman
    Elhaj, Mona
    Alotaibi, Ahmad
    Alboqami, Khaled
    Alturaiki, Fahad
    Alsulaimani, Ali
    Alsulimany, Kholoud
    Khandaker, Mayeen Udinn
    Alamri, Sultan
    Alzamil, Yasser
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 15 (03) : 293 - 298
  • [46] D-dimer in patients infected with COVID-19 and suspected pulmonary embolism
    Garcia-Olive, Ignasi
    Sintes, Helena
    Radua, Joaquim
    Abad Capa, Jorge
    Rosell, Antoni
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 169
  • [47] Pulmonary Embolism Prophylaxis in Patients With COVID-19: An Emerging Issue
    Sanidas, Elias
    Grassos, Charalampos
    Papadopoulos, Dimitrios
    Velliou, Maria
    Barbetseas, John
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2021, 30 (10) : 1435 - 1441
  • [48] Acute Pulmonary Embolism in the COVID-19 Era: The Experience of a Ghanaian Patient
    Asamoah, Kofi Tekyi
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [49] Increased pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19: a case series and literature review
    Sonia Hesam-Shariati
    Poya Fatehi
    Morteza Abouzaripour
    Fardin Fathi
    Negin Hesam-Shariati
    Mohammad Bakhtiar Hesam Shariati
    Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines, 7
  • [50] Increased pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19: a case series and literature review
    Hesam-Shariati, Sonia
    Fatehi, Poya
    Abouzaripour, Morteza
    Fathi, Fardin
    Hesam-Shariati, Negin
    Hesam Shariati, Mohammad Bakhtiar
    TROPICAL DISEASES TRAVEL MEDICINE AND VACCINES, 2021, 7 (01)