Acute pulmonary embolism in patients presenting pulmonary deterioration after hospitalisation for non-critical COVID-19

被引:8
|
作者
Friz, Hernan Polo [1 ]
Gelfi, Elia [1 ]
Orenti, Annalisa [4 ]
Motto, Elena [1 ]
Primitz, Laura [1 ]
Donzelli, Tino [1 ]
Intotero, Marcello [2 ]
Scarpazza, Paolo [3 ]
Vighi, Giuseppe [1 ]
Cimminiello, Claudio [5 ]
Boracchi, Patrizia [4 ]
机构
[1] ASST Vimercate, Internal Med, Med Dept, Vimercate Hosp, Vimercate, Italy
[2] ASST Vimercate, Diagnost Dept, Radiol, Vimercate Hosp, Vimercate, Italy
[3] ASST Vimercate, Med Dept, Pulmonol, Vimercate Hosp, Vimercate, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Clin Sci & Community Hlth, Lab Med Stat Epidemiol & Biometry GA Maccacaro, Milan, Italy
[5] Italian Soc Angiol & Vasc Pathol, SIAPAV, Res & Study Ctr, Milan, Italy
关键词
COVID-19; venous thromboembolism; pulmonary embolism; d-dimer; CT angiography; RISK; RULE;
D O I
10.1111/imj.15307
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Emerging evidence suggests an association between COVID-19 and acute pulmonary embolism (APE). Aims To assess the prevalence of APE in patients hospitalised for non-critical COVID-19 who presented clinical deterioration, and to investigate the association of clinical and biochemical variables with a confirmed diagnosis of APE in these subjects. Methods All consecutive patients admitted to the internal medicine department of a general hospital with a diagnosis of non-critical COVID-19, who performed a computer tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for respiratory deterioration in April 2020, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Results Study populations: 41 subjects, median (interquartile range) age: 71.7 (63-76) years, CPTA confirmed APE = 8 (19.51%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.82-34.87%). Among patients with and without APE, no significant differences were found with regards symptoms, comorbidities, treatment, Wells score and outcomes. The optimal cut-off value of d-dimer for predicting APE was 2454 ng/mL, sensitivity (95% CI): 63 (24-91), specificity: 73 (54-87), positive predictive value: 36 (13-65), negative predictive value: 89 (71-98) and AUC: 0.62 (0.38-0.85). The standard and age-adjusted d-dimer cut-offs, and the Wells score >= 2 did not associate with confirmed APE, albeit a cut-off value of d-dimer = 2454 ng/mL showed an relative risk: 3.21; 95% CI: 0.92-13.97; P = 0.073. Heparin at anticoagulant doses was used in 70.73% of patients before performing CTPA. Conclusion Among patients presenting pulmonary deterioration after hospitalisation for non-critical COVID-19, the prevalence of APE is high. Traditional diagnostic tools to identify high APE pre-test probability patients do not seem to be clinically useful. These results support the use of a high index of suspicion for performing CTPA to exclude or confirm APE as the most appropriate diagnostic approach in this clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1236 / 1242
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis After Non-Critical COVID-19. A Case Report
    Doane, Jedediah J.
    Hirsch, Kellen S.
    Baldwin, Justine O.
    Wurfel, Mark M.
    Pipavath, Sudhakar N.
    West, T. Eoin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS, 2021, 22
  • [32] Incidence of acute pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Roncon, Loris
    Zuin, Marco
    Barco, Stefano
    Valerio, Luca
    Zuliani, Giovanni
    Zonzin, Pietro
    Konstantinides, Stavros V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 82 : 29 - 37
  • [33] Incidence and Outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients
    Badr, Omaima Ibrahim
    Alwafi, Hassan
    Elrefaey, Wael Aly
    Naser, Abdallah Y.
    Shabrawishi, Mohammed
    Alsairafi, Zahra
    Alsaleh, Fatemah M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (14)
  • [34] Pulmonary Embolism in Covid-19 Pandemic: A Threat to Recovery of the Infected Patients
    Obeagu, Emmanuel Ifeanyi
    Babar, Quratulain
    Vincent, C. C. N.
    Okafor, Chukwuma J.
    Eze, Richard
    Chijioke, Udunma Olive
    Ibekwe, Adaobi Maryann
    Uduchi, Immaculata Ogochukwu
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 33 (42A) : 90 - 98
  • [35] Paradoxical Embolism Causing Myocardial Infarction in a COVID-19 Patient Presenting With Pulmonary Embolism
    Yu, Mingxi D.
    Desai, Nimit
    Sanagala, Thriveni
    Darki, Amir
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (03)
  • [36] Acute pulmonary embolism in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients referred to CTPA by emergency department
    Gervaise, Alban
    Bouzad, Caroline
    Peroux, Evelyne
    Helissey, Carole
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (11) : 6170 - 6177
  • [37] Acute pulmonary embolism in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients referred to CTPA by emergency department
    Alban Gervaise
    Caroline Bouzad
    Evelyne Peroux
    Carole Helissey
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 6170 - 6177
  • [38] Lactate and D-Dimer levels in acute pulmonary embolism and COVID-19
    Goktekin, Mehmet Cagri
    Yilmaz, Mustafa
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 13 (12): : 1409 - 1413
  • [39] Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosed by CT Pulmonary Angiography in Patients with COVID-19 and Features of the Associated Factors
    Haidar, Ahmed Ibrahim
    Mohtasib, Rafat Saeed
    Abudraz, Rami Mohammed
    Alsulaiman, Saleh Abdullah
    Tamimi, Faisal Ibrahim A. L.
    Yaqinuddin, Ahmed
    Algarni, Ateeg Mohammed
    Daowd, Rateb Abd A. L. Razak
    Sulieman, Abdelmoneim Adam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICINE, 2024, 14 (02) : 305 - 311
  • [40] What level of D-dimers can safely exclude pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department?
    Revel, Marie-Pierre
    Beeker, Nathanael
    Porcher, Raphael
    Jilet, Lea
    Fournier, Laure
    Rance, Bastien
    Chassagnon, Guillaume
    Fontenay, Michaela
    Sanchez, Olivier
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (04) : 2704 - 2712