Acute pulmonary embolism in patients presenting pulmonary deterioration after hospitalisation for non-critical COVID-19

被引:8
|
作者
Friz, Hernan Polo [1 ]
Gelfi, Elia [1 ]
Orenti, Annalisa [4 ]
Motto, Elena [1 ]
Primitz, Laura [1 ]
Donzelli, Tino [1 ]
Intotero, Marcello [2 ]
Scarpazza, Paolo [3 ]
Vighi, Giuseppe [1 ]
Cimminiello, Claudio [5 ]
Boracchi, Patrizia [4 ]
机构
[1] ASST Vimercate, Internal Med, Med Dept, Vimercate Hosp, Vimercate, Italy
[2] ASST Vimercate, Diagnost Dept, Radiol, Vimercate Hosp, Vimercate, Italy
[3] ASST Vimercate, Med Dept, Pulmonol, Vimercate Hosp, Vimercate, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Clin Sci & Community Hlth, Lab Med Stat Epidemiol & Biometry GA Maccacaro, Milan, Italy
[5] Italian Soc Angiol & Vasc Pathol, SIAPAV, Res & Study Ctr, Milan, Italy
关键词
COVID-19; venous thromboembolism; pulmonary embolism; d-dimer; CT angiography; RISK; RULE;
D O I
10.1111/imj.15307
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Emerging evidence suggests an association between COVID-19 and acute pulmonary embolism (APE). Aims To assess the prevalence of APE in patients hospitalised for non-critical COVID-19 who presented clinical deterioration, and to investigate the association of clinical and biochemical variables with a confirmed diagnosis of APE in these subjects. Methods All consecutive patients admitted to the internal medicine department of a general hospital with a diagnosis of non-critical COVID-19, who performed a computer tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for respiratory deterioration in April 2020, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Results Study populations: 41 subjects, median (interquartile range) age: 71.7 (63-76) years, CPTA confirmed APE = 8 (19.51%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.82-34.87%). Among patients with and without APE, no significant differences were found with regards symptoms, comorbidities, treatment, Wells score and outcomes. The optimal cut-off value of d-dimer for predicting APE was 2454 ng/mL, sensitivity (95% CI): 63 (24-91), specificity: 73 (54-87), positive predictive value: 36 (13-65), negative predictive value: 89 (71-98) and AUC: 0.62 (0.38-0.85). The standard and age-adjusted d-dimer cut-offs, and the Wells score >= 2 did not associate with confirmed APE, albeit a cut-off value of d-dimer = 2454 ng/mL showed an relative risk: 3.21; 95% CI: 0.92-13.97; P = 0.073. Heparin at anticoagulant doses was used in 70.73% of patients before performing CTPA. Conclusion Among patients presenting pulmonary deterioration after hospitalisation for non-critical COVID-19, the prevalence of APE is high. Traditional diagnostic tools to identify high APE pre-test probability patients do not seem to be clinically useful. These results support the use of a high index of suspicion for performing CTPA to exclude or confirm APE as the most appropriate diagnostic approach in this clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1236 / 1242
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cardiopulmonary Complications after Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19
    Suarez-Castillejo, Carla
    Calvo, Nestor
    Preda, Luminita
    Diaz, Rocio Cordova
    Toledo-Pons, Nuria
    Martinez, Joaquin
    Pons, Jaume
    Vives-Borras, Miquel
    Pericas, Pere
    Ramon, Luisa
    Iglesias, Amanda
    Canaves-Gomez, Laura
    Felices, Jose Luis Valera
    Morell-Garcia, Daniel
    Nunez, Belen
    Sauleda, Jaume
    Sala-Llinas, Ernest
    Alonso-Fernandez, Alberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2024, 25 (13)
  • [22] Prevalence of Acute Pulmonary Embolism at Autopsy in Patients With COVID-19
    Zuin, Marco
    Engelen, Matthias M.
    Bilato, Claudio
    Vanassche, Thomas
    Rigatelli, Gianluca
    Verhamme, Peter
    Vandenbriele, Christophe
    Zuliani, Giovanni
    Roncon, Loris
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 171 : 159 - 164
  • [23] Critical Management of Haemodynamically Unstable Acute Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19
    Pradipta, Eka Adip
    Rossimarina, Vienna
    Kemalasari, Indira
    Danny, Siska Suridanda
    ACTA MEDICA INDONESIANA, 2024, 56 (04) : 530 - 536
  • [24] Case of COVID-19 infection and polycythaemia presenting with massive acute pulmonary embolism
    Nawazani, Asadullah
    Ghanaim, Mahmoud
    Tariq, Sadia
    BMJ CASE REPORTS, 2020, 13 (09)
  • [25] EVALUATION OF PULMONARY EMBOLISM IN THE PACE OF COVID-19
    Akkus, Canan
    Yilmaz, Hakan
    Adibelli, Zelal
    Demirci, Hakan
    Kartal, Melih
    Duran, Cevdet
    ACTA MEDICA MEDITERRANEA, 2021, 37 (05): : 2329 - 2335
  • [26] Changing face of pulmonary embolism with COVID-19
    Bagirtan, Bayram
    Altuntas, Emine
    Yasar, Servan
    Karabay, Kanber Ocal
    CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA, 2023, 34 (01) : 4 - 8
  • [27] Predicting acute pulmonary embolism in COVID-19
    Koc, Ibrahim
    Deniz, Olgun
    Ozmen, Sevda Unalli
    Bulut, Sertan
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (34) : E34916
  • [28] Pulmonary embolism in an adolescent with COVID-19 pneumonia
    Nunez-Paucar, Hector
    De Coll-Vela, Liz E.
    Pena-Coello, Claudia
    Guillen-Buleje, Deli
    Atamari-Anahui, Noe
    Gomez-Martinez, Luis
    Huby-Munoz, Cynthia L.
    Zamudio-Aquise, Mariela K.
    Bernal-Mancilla, Raul R.
    BOLETIN MEDICO DEL HOSPITAL INFANTIL DE MEXICO, 2023, 80 : S33 - S39
  • [29] Characteristics of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With COVID-19 Associated Pneumonia From the City of Wuhan
    Chen, Jianpu
    Wang, Xiang
    Zhang, Shutong
    Lin, Bin
    Wu, Xiaoqing
    Wang, Yanfang
    Wang, Xiaoqi
    Yang, Ming
    Sun, Jianqing
    Xie, Yuanliang
    CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS, 2020, 26
  • [30] Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 Pneumonia: An Overlapping Diagnosis or a Misdiagnosis?
    Secco, Eleonora
    Pasqualetto, Maria Cristina
    Rigo, Fausto
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ECHOGRAPHY, 2020, 30 (02) : 110 - 112