Acute pulmonary embolism in patients presenting pulmonary deterioration after hospitalisation for non-critical COVID-19

被引:8
|
作者
Friz, Hernan Polo [1 ]
Gelfi, Elia [1 ]
Orenti, Annalisa [4 ]
Motto, Elena [1 ]
Primitz, Laura [1 ]
Donzelli, Tino [1 ]
Intotero, Marcello [2 ]
Scarpazza, Paolo [3 ]
Vighi, Giuseppe [1 ]
Cimminiello, Claudio [5 ]
Boracchi, Patrizia [4 ]
机构
[1] ASST Vimercate, Internal Med, Med Dept, Vimercate Hosp, Vimercate, Italy
[2] ASST Vimercate, Diagnost Dept, Radiol, Vimercate Hosp, Vimercate, Italy
[3] ASST Vimercate, Med Dept, Pulmonol, Vimercate Hosp, Vimercate, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Clin Sci & Community Hlth, Lab Med Stat Epidemiol & Biometry GA Maccacaro, Milan, Italy
[5] Italian Soc Angiol & Vasc Pathol, SIAPAV, Res & Study Ctr, Milan, Italy
关键词
COVID-19; venous thromboembolism; pulmonary embolism; d-dimer; CT angiography; RISK; RULE;
D O I
10.1111/imj.15307
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Emerging evidence suggests an association between COVID-19 and acute pulmonary embolism (APE). Aims To assess the prevalence of APE in patients hospitalised for non-critical COVID-19 who presented clinical deterioration, and to investigate the association of clinical and biochemical variables with a confirmed diagnosis of APE in these subjects. Methods All consecutive patients admitted to the internal medicine department of a general hospital with a diagnosis of non-critical COVID-19, who performed a computer tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for respiratory deterioration in April 2020, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Results Study populations: 41 subjects, median (interquartile range) age: 71.7 (63-76) years, CPTA confirmed APE = 8 (19.51%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.82-34.87%). Among patients with and without APE, no significant differences were found with regards symptoms, comorbidities, treatment, Wells score and outcomes. The optimal cut-off value of d-dimer for predicting APE was 2454 ng/mL, sensitivity (95% CI): 63 (24-91), specificity: 73 (54-87), positive predictive value: 36 (13-65), negative predictive value: 89 (71-98) and AUC: 0.62 (0.38-0.85). The standard and age-adjusted d-dimer cut-offs, and the Wells score >= 2 did not associate with confirmed APE, albeit a cut-off value of d-dimer = 2454 ng/mL showed an relative risk: 3.21; 95% CI: 0.92-13.97; P = 0.073. Heparin at anticoagulant doses was used in 70.73% of patients before performing CTPA. Conclusion Among patients presenting pulmonary deterioration after hospitalisation for non-critical COVID-19, the prevalence of APE is high. Traditional diagnostic tools to identify high APE pre-test probability patients do not seem to be clinically useful. These results support the use of a high index of suspicion for performing CTPA to exclude or confirm APE as the most appropriate diagnostic approach in this clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1236 / 1242
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Challenges in the diagnostic approach of suspected pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients
    Stals, M. A. M.
    Kaptein, F. H. J.
    Kroft, L. J. M.
    Klok, F. A.
    Huisman, M., V
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2021, 133 : 36 - 41
  • [2] Diagnostic Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 and Other Special Patient Populations
    Martens, Emily S. L.
    Huisman, Menno V.
    Klok, Frederikus A.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (06)
  • [3] Predictors of pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19
    Bahk, Jeeyune
    Rehman, Abdul
    Ho, Kam Sing
    Narasimhan, Bharat
    Ul, Hafiza Noor
    Baloch, Ain
    Zhang, Jiafang
    Yip, Rowena
    Lookstein, Robert
    Steiger, David J.
    THROMBOSIS JOURNAL, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [4] Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism
    Koc, Ibrahim
    Yildiz, Ozlem
    Babalik, Mesiha
    Isigibol, Rahime Ozgur
    Ozmen, Sevda Unalli
    Zeytinoglu, Duygu
    Savas, Nazan Nalci
    Yapici, Ilhami
    Celikten, Halil
    Demirsoy, Sedat
    Deniz, Olgun
    TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 260 (02) : 127 - 133
  • [5] Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with and without COVID-19
    Trimaille, Antonin
    Curtiaud, Anais
    Matsushita, Kensuke
    Marchandot, Benjamin
    Von Hunolstein, Jean-Jacques
    Sato, Chisato
    Leonard-Lorant, Ian
    Sattler, Laurent
    Grunebaum, Lelia
    Ohana, Mickael
    Ohlmann, Patrick
    Jesel, Laurence
    Morel, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (10)
  • [6] Pulmonary embolism in hospitalised patients with COVID-19
    Whyte, Martin B.
    Kelly, Philip A.
    Gonzalez, Elisa
    Arya, Roopen
    Roberts, Lara N.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2020, 195 : 95 - 99
  • [7] Abrupt deterioration and pulmonary embolism in COVID-19: a case report
    Motwani, Manish
    CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 20 (04) : E95 - E96
  • [8] A case of non-severe COVID-19 complicated by pulmonary embolism
    Akiyama, Yuto
    Horiuchi, Kohei
    Kondo, Yasushi
    Kabata, Hiroki
    Ishii, Makoto
    Fukunaga, Koichi
    RESPIROLOGY CASE REPORTS, 2020, 8 (07):
  • [9] Pulmonary embolism in patients with dyspnea after COVID-19 infection
    EKICI, A.
    EKICI, M.
    BACCIOGLU, A.
    INANC, F. A. K. Y. U. Z.
    ASLAN, H.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 26 (10) : 3751 - 3759
  • [10] Acute Pulmonary Embolism and COVID-19
    Poyiadji, Neo
    Cormier, Peter
    Patel, Parth Y.
    Hadied, Mohamad O.
    Bhargava, Pallavi
    Khanna, Kanika
    Nadig, Jeffrey
    Keimig, Thomas
    Spizarny, David
    Reeser, Nicholas
    Klochko, Chad
    Peterson, Edward L.
    Song, Thomas
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 297 (03) : E335 - E338