Regional Innovation Systems in Poland: How to classify them?

被引:3
作者
Ciolek, Dorota [1 ]
Golejewska, Anna [2 ]
Yaghi, Adriana Zablocka-Abi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gdansk, Dept Econometr, 119-121 Armii Krajowej St, PL-81824 Sopot, Poland
[2] Univ Gdansk, Dept Int Econ & Econ Dev, 119-121 Armii Krajowej St, PL-81824 Sopot, Poland
[3] Univ Gdansk, Dept European Integrat Res, 119-121 Armii Krajowej St, PL-81824 Sopot, Poland
来源
EKONOMIKA REGIONA-ECONOMY OF REGION | 2021年 / 17卷 / 03期
关键词
regional economics; Regional Innovation System; innovation inputs; innovation outputs; metropolitan NUTS 3; non-metropolitan NUTS 3; classification; panel data; cluster analysis; Poland; ORGANIZATION; GEOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-3-19
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
The literature emphasises the role of regional and local innovation environment. Regional Innovation Systems show differences in innovation outputs determined by different inputs. Understanding these relationships can have important implications for regional and innovation policy. The research aims to classify Regional Innovation Systems in Poland according to their innovation capacity and performance. The analysis covers 72 subregions (classified as NUTS 3 in the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) in 2004-2016. Classes of Regional Innovation Systems in Poland were identified based on a combination of linear and functional approaches and data from published and unpublished sources. It was assumed that innovation systems in Poland differ due to their location in metropolitan and non-metropolitan regions, thus, the Eurostat NUTS 3 metro/non-metro typology was applied for this purpose. Panel data regressions as models with individual random effects were estimated separately for metropolitan and non-metropolitan groups of subregions. The study identified common determinants of innovation outputs in both NUTS 3 types: share of innovative industrial enterprises, industry share, unemployment rate, and employment in research and development. Next, NUTS 3 were classified within each of two analysed types in line with output- and input-indices, the latter being calculated as non-weighted average of significant inputs. Last, the subregions were clustered based on individual inputs to enable a more detailed assessment of their innovation potential. The cluster analysis using k-means method with maximum cluster distance was applied. The results showed that the composition of the classes identified within metropolitan and non-metropolitan systems in 20042016 remains unstable, similarly to the composition of clusters identified by inputs. The latter confirms the changes in components of the capacity within both Regional Innovation System types. The observed situation allows us to assume that Regional Innovation Systems in Poland are evolving. In further research, the efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems should be assessed, taking into account the differences between metropolitan and non-metropolitan regions as well as other environmental factors that may determine the efficiency of innovative processes.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 1003
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Asheim B. T., 2005, The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems, P291, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199286805.003.0011
[2]  
Asheim B. T., 2003, NORDIC SMES REGIONAL, P95
[3]  
Asheim B. T., 2015, Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Economic Geography, P272
[4]  
Asheim B.T., 2002, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V27, P77, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1013100704794
[5]  
Asheim BT, 2016, HANDBOOK ON THE GEOGRAPHIES OF INNOVATION, P45
[6]   Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases [J].
Asheim, Bjorn T. ;
Boschma, Ron ;
Cooke, Philip .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2011, 45 (07) :893-904
[7]  
Becattini G., 1992, Les regions qui gagnent, P35
[8]  
Benko G., 2000, GEO J, V51, P157, DOI [10.1023/A:1017509623931, DOI 10.1023/A:1017509623931]
[9]   The biotechnology industry in the Prague metropolitan region: a cluster within a fragmented innovation system? [J].
Blazek, Jiri ;
Zizalova, Pavla .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2010, 28 (05) :887-904
[10]  
Braczyk H.-J., 1998, REGIONAL INNOVATION, P464