Gender and climate risk management: evidence of climate information use in Ghana

被引:100
作者
Partey, Samuel T. [1 ]
Dakorah, Angela D. [2 ]
Zougmore, Robert B. [1 ]
Ouedraogo, Mathieu [1 ]
Nyasimi, Mary [3 ]
Nikoi, Gordon K. [4 ]
Huyer, Sophia [3 ]
机构
[1] Int Crops Res Inst Semi Arid Trop, CCAFS, BP 320, Bamako, Mali
[2] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Renewable Nat Resources, Univ PO, Kumasi, Ghana
[3] Ctr Int Agr Trop, CCAFS, KM17,Apartado Aereo 6713, Cali, Colombia
[4] Esoko Ltd, 42 Ring Rd Cent, Accra, Ghana
关键词
AGRICULTURE; AFRICA; COMMUNITIES; ADOPTION; LESSONS; LAND;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-018-2239-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The gender perspective of climate information use is not well studied although necessary for developing gender-responsive climate information services (CIS). This study determined how CIS use by men and women farmers may be influenced by their perceptions about climate change (CC), farm activities, and demography. The study was carried out at the Lawra-Jirapa Districts of the Upper West Region of Ghana where downscaled seasonal forecast information through mobile phone technologies (Esoko platform) had been disseminated to farmers since 2011. Data was collected from semi-structured questionnaire interviews involving 900 farmers (50.2% women and 49.8% men) and four 20-member focus group discussions. The study confirmed 85.2% (representing 767) farmers were aware of climate change and its implications for their agriculture and other livelihood activities. Men and women had similar perceptions about climate change, perceived by the majority as increased strong winds, higher temperatures, increased frequency of drought, increased rainfall variability and increased flooding. Among other factors, it was evident that use of CIS may be influenced by gender. Men were found to be particularly responsive in adopting CIS use for climate risk mitigation. This was attributed to their ability to easily access and use telephone devices compared with women. The study revealed that unlike women, men were able to access more financial resources and had control of household income which allowed them to purchase mobile phones. Women generally accessed their husbands' mobile phones. Despite differences in access to CIS, the study showed both men and women found it beneficial for strategic farm decision-making such as when to begin land preparation, when to plant, and which crop to select. In addition, both men and women were found to face similar constrains (such as poor network connectivity and limited of training), to accessing and using CIS through the Esoko platform. The study recommends the need to explore different CIS dissemination channels and design CIS that meet gender-specific needs.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 75
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [11] Etwire P.M., 2017, Agriculture and Food Security, V6, P8, DOI [DOI 10.1186/S40066-016, 10.1186/s40066-016-0088-y, DOI 10.1186/S40066-016-0088-Y, DOI 10.1186/s40066-016-0088-y]
  • [12] Farmers' perception and adaptation to climate change: A case study of Sekyedumase district in Ghana
    B. Y. Fosu-Mensah
    P. L. G. Vlek
    D. S. MacCarthy
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2012, 14 (4) : 495 - 505
  • [13] Ghana Statistical Service, 2014, POP CENS 2010 DISTR
  • [14] Gilbert Robert A., 2002, Gender Analysis of a Nationwide Cropping System Trial Survey in Malawi
  • [15] Gillwald A., 2010, 5 RES ICT AFR
  • [16] Goldman A, 2001, AFR STUD Q, V6, P45
  • [17] Hansen J, 2016, AGR PRACTICES TECHNO
  • [18] Understanding gender dimensions of agriculture and climate change in smallholder farming communities
    Jost, Christine
    Kyazze, Florence
    Naab, Jesse
    Neelormi, Sharmind
    Kinyangi, James
    Zougmore, Robert
    Aggarwal, Pramod
    Bhatta, Gopal
    Chaudhury, Moushumi
    Tapio-Bistrom, Marja-Liisa
    Nelson, Sibyl
    Kristjanson, Patti
    [J]. CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 8 (02) : 133 - 144
  • [19] Farmers' adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research
    Knowler, Duncan
    Bradshaw, Ben
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2007, 32 (01) : 25 - 48
  • [20] Kovarik E., 2015, 79 CCAFS