Optometrists referrals for glaucoma assessment: a prospective survey of clinical data and outcomes

被引:29
作者
Lockwood, A. J. [1 ]
Kirwan, J. F. [1 ]
Ashleigh, Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Alexandra Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Portsmouth, Hants, England
关键词
glaucoma; optometrist; outcome; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE-VALUE; PREVALENCE; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1038/eye.2010.77
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Aim The aim of this study is to determine the outcomes following referral for glaucoma from routine optometric practice and the positive predictive value (PPV). Methods A prospective study of 441 referrals for glaucoma in the Portsmouth area was performed over 6 months. A positive outcome was defined when the patient had the diagnosis of glaucoma made or if there was a high index of suspicion of glaucoma requiring follow-up. The PPV was determined from positive outcome number/referral number. Results The overall PPV was 0.37 (95% confidence interval 0.33-0.42). Open-angle glaucoma (OAG) was confirmed in 33 (7%) patients. A diagnosis of ocular hypertension was made in 49 (11%) patients and glaucoma suspect in 92 (21%) referrals. Two-thirds of optometrists recorded all 3 assessments: fields, intraocular pressure (IOP) and disc appearance, a figure representing 293 referrals (PPV 0.37). However the greatest referral accuracy was seen when only discs and IOPs were recorded (PPV 0.47). When all three tests were given as reasons for suspicion for glaucoma, the PPV was 0.71. The number of patients diagnosed with OAG from Portsea Island during the study period was 7, whereas the expected number of diagnosed patients was 29. Conclusion Wider use of perimetry by optometrists and increased reporting of all three tests has not led to an increase in PPV. There remain a considerable number of undiagnosed patients with glaucoma in the population. Eye (2010) 24, 1515-1519; doi:10.1038/eye.2010.77; published online 18 June 2010
引用
收藏
页码:1515 / 1519
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   The influence of the new general ophthalmic services (GOS) contract in optometrist referrals for glaucoma in Scotland [J].
Ang, G. S. ;
Ng, W. S. ;
Azuara-Blanco, A. .
EYE, 2009, 23 (02) :351-355
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001 CENSUS
[3]  
Bell RWD, 1997, OPHTHAL PHYSL OPT, V17, P3, DOI 10.1016/S0275-5408(96)00065-8
[4]  
Bell RWD, 1997, OPHTHAL PHYSL OPT, V17, P7
[5]   Can a community optometrist-based referral refinement scheme reduce false-positive glaucoma hospital referrals without compromising quality of care? The community and hospital allied network glaucoma evaluation scheme (CHANGES) [J].
Bourne, R. R. A. ;
French, K. A. ;
Chang, L. ;
Borman, A. D. ;
Hingorani, M. ;
Newsom, W. D. .
EYE, 2010, 24 (05) :881-887
[6]   Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service [J].
Bowling, B ;
Chen, SDM ;
Salmon, JF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 89 (09) :1102-1104
[7]   Uses and abuses of screening tests [J].
Grimes, DA ;
Schulz, KF .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9309) :881-884
[8]   Economic evaluation of screening for open-angle glaucoma [J].
Hernandez, Rodolfo A. ;
Burr, Jennifer M. ;
Vale, Luke D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 24 (02) :203-211
[9]   Pharmacological mydriasis and optic disc examination [J].
Kirwan, JF ;
Gouws, P ;
Linnell, AET ;
Crowston, J ;
Bunce, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 84 (08) :894-898
[10]   Tonometry Through the Ages [J].
Kniestedt, Christoph ;
Punjabi, Omar ;
Lin, Shan ;
Stamper, Robert L. .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 53 (06) :568-591