Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

被引:359
作者
Warr, DG
Hesketh, PJ
Gralla, RJ
Muss, HB
Herrstedt, J
Eisenberg, PD
Raftopoulos, H
Grunberg, SM
Gabriel, M
Rodgers, A
Bohidar, N
Klinger, G
Hustad, CM
Horgan, KJ
Skobieranda, F
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] St Elizabeths Med Ctr, Brighton, MA USA
[3] New York Lung Canc Alliance, New York, NY USA
[4] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
[5] Univ Vermont, Burlington, VT USA
[6] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[7] Calif Canc Ctr, Greenbrae, CA USA
[8] Merck & Co Inc, West Point, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.09.050
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose This is the first study in which the NK1-receptor antagonist, aprepitant (APR), was evaluated for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Eligible breast cancer patients were naive to emetogenic chemotherapy and treated with cyclophosphamide +/- doxorubicin or epirubicin. Patients were randomly assigned to either an aprepitant regimen (day 1, APR 125 mg, ondansetron (OND) 8 mg, and dexamethasone 12 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 mg 8 hours later; days 2 through 3, APR 80 qid) or a control regimen (day 1, OND 8 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 mg 8 hours later; days 2 through 3, OND 8 mg bid). Data on nausea, vomiting, and use of rescue medication were collected with a self-report diary. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients with complete response, defined as no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy, during 120 hours after initiation of chemotherapy in cycle 1. The secondary end point was the proportion of patients with an average item score higher than 6 of 7 on the Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire. Results Of 866 patients randomized, 857 patients (99 %) were assessable. Overall complete response was greater with the aprepitant regimen than with the control regimen (50.8 % v 42.5 %; P = .015). More patients in the aprepitant group reported minimal or no impact of CINV on daily life (63.5 % v55.6 %; P= .019). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. Conclusion The aprepitant regimen was more effective than the control regimen for prevention of CINV in patients receiving both an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide.
引用
收藏
页码:2822 / 2830
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Antiemetic prescription in Italian breast cancer patients submitted to adjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Ballatori, E ;
Ruggeri, B ;
De Angelis, V ;
Patoia, L ;
Palazzo, S ;
Cinieri, S .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2003, 11 (12) :785-789
[2]   Delayed emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: Do we need to treat all patients? [J].
Ballatori, E ;
Roila, F ;
DeAngelis, V ;
Riva, E ;
Barbieri, P ;
DelFavero, A ;
Basurto, C ;
Ciccarese, G ;
Palladino, MA ;
Mosconi, AM ;
Anastasi, P ;
Picciafuoco, M ;
Campora, E ;
Chiara, S ;
Cognetti, F ;
Ferraresi, V ;
Fabi, A ;
Tonachella, R ;
Cirulli, S ;
Sabbatini, R ;
Federico, M ;
Trassoldati, A ;
Silingardi, V ;
Donati, D ;
Maestri, A ;
Malacarne, P ;
Ricci, S ;
Antonuzzo, A ;
Allegrini, G ;
Conte, PF ;
Salvati, F ;
Nunziati, F ;
Antilli, A ;
Catalano, G ;
Cascinu, S ;
DiCostanzo, F ;
Tagliaventi, M ;
Zaniboni, A ;
Meriggi, F ;
Cortesi, E ;
Ramponi, S ;
Locatelli, MC ;
Santoro, A ;
Zucchinelli, P ;
Mantellini, E ;
Ferretti, G ;
Boni, C ;
Moretti, G ;
Scagliotti, G ;
Daniele, O .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 (06) :561-567
[3]   Prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis by the oral neurokinin-1 antagonist, MK-869, in combination with granisetron and dexamethasone or with dexamethasone alone [J].
Campos, D ;
Pereira, JR ;
Reinhardt, RR ;
Carracedo, C ;
Poli, S ;
Vogel, C ;
Martinez-Cedillo, J ;
Erazo, A ;
Wittreich, J ;
Eriksson, LO ;
Carides, AD ;
Gertz, BJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (06) :1759-1767
[4]  
DAUGAARD G, 2003, SAN ANT BREAST CANC
[5]   The oral NK1 antagonist, aprepitant, given with standard antiemetics provides protection against nausea and vomiting over multiple cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy:: a combined analysis of two randomised, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trials [J].
de Wit, R ;
Herrstedt, J ;
Rapoport, B ;
Carides, AD ;
Guoguang-Ma, J ;
Elmer, M ;
Schmidt, C ;
Evans, JK ;
Horgan, KJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (03) :403-410
[6]   Improved prevention of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with palonosetron, a pharmacologically novel 5-HT3 receptor antagonist -: Results of a phase III, single-dose trial versus dolasetron [J].
Eisenberg, P ;
Figueroa-Vadillo, J ;
Zamora, R ;
Charu, V ;
Hajdenberg, J ;
Cartmell, A ;
Macciocchi, A ;
Grunberg, S .
CANCER, 2003, 98 (11) :2473-2482
[7]   The broad-spectrum anti-emetic activity of the novel non-peptide tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonist GR203040 [J].
Gardner, CJ ;
Twissell, DJ ;
Dale, TJ ;
Gale, JD ;
Jordan, CC ;
Kilpatrick, GJ ;
Bountra, C ;
Ward, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 116 (08) :3158-3163
[8]   Palonosetron improves prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a double-blind randomized phase III trial comparing single doses of palonosetron with ondansetron [J].
Gralla, R ;
Lichinitser, M ;
Van der Vegt, S ;
Sleeboom, H ;
Mezger, J ;
Peschel, C ;
Tonini, G ;
Labianca, R ;
Macciocchi, A ;
Aapro, M .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (10) :1570-1577
[9]   Recommendations for the use of antiemetics: Evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines [J].
Gralla, RJ ;
Osoba, D ;
Kris, MG ;
Kirkbride, P ;
Hesketh, PJ ;
Chinnery, LW ;
Clark-Snow, R ;
Gill, DP ;
Groshen, S ;
Grunberg, S ;
Koeller, JM ;
Morrow, GR ;
Perez, EA ;
Silber, JH ;
Pfister, DG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (09) :2971-2994
[10]  
GRALLA RJ, 2004, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V22, P759