Treatment Outcomes of Proliferative vs. Non-proliferative Adult Lupus Nephritis: A 10-Year Follow-Up

Introduction Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic disease with clinically heterogeneous outcomes. Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common complication of SLE. LN impacts clinical SLE outcomes both directly, in the form of target organ damage, and indirectly, through the adverse effects of immunosuppressive therapy. Patients & methods The study included 402 SLE cases with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis who were under follow-up for the past. 13 years al Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Egypt. We studied the differences in outcome among various LN classes and between 275 proliferative cases and 102 non-proliferative cases. Results Class IV was the main LN class in our series with renal survival of 60% at 10 years. The major induction regimen after the first biopsy was cyclophosphamide. Mycophenolate mofetil was the main induction and adjunctive regimen after the second biopsy. The mean follow-up period was 6.7 + 5.2 years. Higher serum creatinine, proteinuria, activity, and chronicity indices were noted in proliferative LN. Patients suffering from proliferative lesions received higher immunosuppression and demonstrated higher morbidity than those with non-proliferative lesions. Remission was higher among the non-proliferative compared to the proliferative group. Conclusions Serum creatinine, proteinuria, and LN class were the most relevant prognostic factors for renal survival among Egyptian LN patients.