Diagnostic performance of machine learning applied to texture analysis-derived features for breast lesion characterisation at automated breast ultrasound: a pilot study

被引:15
作者
Marcon, Magda [1 ]
Ciritsis, Alexander [1 ]
Rossi, Cristina [1 ]
Becker, Anton S. [1 ]
Berger, Nicole [1 ]
Wurnig, Moritz C. [1 ]
Wagner, Matthias W. [1 ]
Frauenfelder, Thomas [1 ]
Boss, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Zurich, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Raemistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Machine learning; Ultrasonography; CT TEXTURE; CANCER HETEROGENEITY; TUMOR HETEROGENEITY; SCREENING US; CLASSIFICATION; WOMEN; PREDICTION; MRI; MAMMOGRAPHY; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1186/s41747-019-0121-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Our aims were to determine if features derived from texture analysis (TA) can distinguish normal, benign, and malignant tissue on automated breast ultrasound (ABUS); to evaluate whether machine learning (ML) applied to TA can categorise ABUS findings; and to compare ML to the analysis of single texture features for lesion classification. Methods This ethically approved retrospective pilot study included 54 women with benign (n = 38) and malignant (n = 32) solid breast lesions who underwent ABUS. After manual region of interest placement along the lesions' margin as well as the surrounding fat and glandular breast tissue, 47 texture features (TFs) were calculated for each category. Statistical analysis (ANOVA) and a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm were applied to the texture feature to evaluate the accuracy in distinguishing (i) lesions versus normal tissue and (ii) benign versus malignant lesions. Results Skewness and kurtosis were the only TF significantly different among all the four categories (p < 0.000001). In subsets (i) and (ii), a maximum area under the curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.88) for energy and 0.86 (95% CI 0.82-0.89) for entropy were obtained. Using the SVM algorithm, a maximum area under the curve of 0.98 for both subsets was obtained with a maximum accuracy of 94.4% in subset (i) and 90.7% in subset (ii). Conclusions TA in combination with ML might represent a useful diagnostic tool in the evaluation of breast imaging findings in ABUS. Applying ML techniques to TFs might be superior compared to the analysis of single TF.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Complexity curve and grey level co-occurrence matrix in the texture evaluation of breast tumor on ultrasound images [J].
Alvarenga, Andre Victor ;
Pereira, Wagner C. A. ;
Infantosi, Antonio Fernando C. ;
Azevedo, Carolina M. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (02) :379-387
[2]   Breast Cancer Detected with Screening US: Reasons for Nondetection at Mammography [J].
Bae, Min Sun ;
Moon, Woo Kyung ;
Chang, Jung Min ;
Koo, Hye Ryoung ;
Kim, Won Hwa ;
Cho, Nariya ;
Yi, Ann ;
Yun, Bo La ;
Lee, Su Hyun ;
Kim, Mi Young ;
Ryu, Eun Bi ;
Seo, Mirinae .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 270 (02) :369-377
[3]   Classification of breast cancer in ultrasound imaging using a generic deep learning analysis software: a pilot study [J].
Becker, Anton S. ;
Mueller, Michael ;
Stofel, Elina ;
Marcon, Magda ;
Ghafoor, Soleen ;
Boss, Andreas .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1083)
[4]  
Becker AS, 2017, ACTA RADIOL OPEN, V6, DOI 10.1177/2058460117729574
[5]   Diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen: Impact of b-values on texture analysis features [J].
Becker, Anton S. ;
Wagner, Matthias W. ;
Wurnig, Moritz C. ;
Boss, Andreas .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2017, 30 (01)
[6]   Sample size planning for classification models [J].
Beleites, Claudia ;
Neugebauer, Ute ;
Bocklitz, Thomas ;
Krafft, Christoph ;
Popp, Juergen .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2013, 760 :25-33
[7]   Detection of Breast Cancer With Addition of Annual Screening Ultrasound or a Single Screening MRI to Mammography in Women With Elevated Breast Cancer Risk [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Zhang, Zheng ;
Lehrer, Daniel ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Boehm-Velez, Marcela ;
Mahoney, Mary C. ;
Evans, W. Phil, III ;
Larsen, Linda H. ;
Morton, Marilyn J. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Farria, Dione M. ;
Cormack, Jean B. ;
Marques, Helga S. ;
Adams, Amanda ;
Yeh, Nolin M. ;
Gabrielli, Glenna .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (13) :1394-1404
[8]   Assessing Improvement in Detection of Breast Cancer with Three-dimensional Automated Breast US in Women with Dense Breast Tissue: The Somoinsight Study [J].
Brem, Rachel F. ;
Tabar, Laszlo ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Inciardi, Marc F. ;
Guingrich, Jessica A. ;
Hashimoto, Beverly E. ;
Lander, Marla R. ;
Lapidus, Robert L. ;
Peterson, Mary Kay ;
Rapelyea, Jocelyn A. ;
Roux, Susan ;
Schilling, Kathy J. ;
Shah, Biren A. ;
Torrente, Jessica ;
Wynn, Ralph T. ;
Miller, Dave P. .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (03) :663-673
[9]   SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique [J].
Chawla, Nitesh V. ;
Bowyer, Kevin W. ;
Hall, Lawrence O. ;
Kegelmeyer, W. Philip .
2002, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (16)
[10]  
D'Orsi C.J., 2013, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data SystemACR BI-RADS Atlas