Planetary well-being

被引:25
作者
Kortetmaki, Teea [1 ,2 ]
Puurtinen, Mikael [1 ,3 ]
Salo, Miikka [1 ,2 ]
Aro, Riikka [1 ,2 ]
Baumeister, Stefan [1 ,4 ]
Duflot, Remi [1 ,3 ]
Elo, Merja [1 ,3 ]
Halme, Panu [1 ,3 ]
Husu, Hanna-Mari [1 ,2 ]
Huttunen, Suvi [1 ,2 ]
Hyvonen, Katriina [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Karkulehto, Sanna [1 ,7 ]
Kataja-aho, Saana [1 ,8 ]
Keskinen, Kirsi E. [1 ,9 ,10 ]
Kulmunki, Inari [1 ,7 ]
Makinen, Tuuli [1 ,7 ]
Nayha, Annukka [1 ,4 ]
Okkolin, Mari-Anne [1 ,13 ]
Perala, Tommi [1 ,3 ]
Purhonen, Jenna [1 ,3 ]
Raatikainen, Kaisa J. [1 ,3 ,11 ]
Raippalinna, Liia-Maria [1 ,12 ]
Salonen, Kirsi [1 ,14 ]
Savolainen, Katri [1 ,5 ]
Kotiaho, Janne S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Sch Resource Wisdom, POB 35, Jyvaskyla 40014, Finland
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Social Sci & Philosophy, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[3] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[4] Univ Jyvaskyla, Sch Business & Econ, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[5] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Psychol, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[6] JAMK Univ Appl Sci, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[7] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Mus Art & Culture Studies, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[8] Univ Jyvaskyla, Open Univ Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[9] Univ Jyvaskyla, Gerontol Res Ctr, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[10] Univ Jyvaskyla, Fac Sport & Hlth Sci, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[11] Univ Turku, Geog Sect, Dept Geog & Geol, Turku, Finland
[12] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Hist & Ethnol, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[13] Peace Educ Inst, Helsinki, Finland
[14] Tampere Univ, Fac Social Sci, Tampere, Finland
来源
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS | 2021年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
SUSTAINABILITY; ANTHROPOCENE; ENVIRONMENT; FRAMEWORK; WELFARE; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-021-00899-3
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Tensions between the well-being of present humans, future humans, and nonhuman nature manifest in social protests and political and academic debates over the future of Earth. The increasing consumption of natural resources no longer increases, let alone equalises, human well-being, but has led to the current ecological crisis and harms both human and nonhuman well-being. While the crisis has been acknowledged, the existing conceptual frameworks are in some respects ill-equipped to address the crisis in a way that would link the resolving of the crisis with the pivotal aim of promoting equal well-being. The shortcomings of the existing concepts in this respect relate to anthropocentric normative orientation, methodological individualism that disregards process dynamics and precludes integrating the considerations of human and nonhuman well-being, and the lack of multiscalar considerations of well-being. This work derives and proposes the concept of planetary well-being to address the aforementioned conceptual issues, to recognise the moral considerability of both human and nonhuman well-being, and to promote transdisciplinary, cross-cultural discourse for addressing the crisis and for promoting societal and cultural transformation. Conceptually, planetary well-being shifts focus on well-being from individuals to processes, Earth system and ecosystem processes, that underlie all well-being. Planetary well-being is a state where the integrity of Earth system and ecosystem processes remains unimpaired to a degree that species and populations can persist to the future and organisms have the opportunity to achieve well-being. After grounding and introducing planetary well-being, this work shortly discusses how the concept can be operationalised and reflects upon its potential as a bridging concept between different worldviews.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Alvaredo F., 2018, Informe sobre la desigualdad global
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Nairobi, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781108627146
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Asia and the Pacific
[4]   The biomass distribution on Earth [J].
Bar-On, Yinon M. ;
Phillips, Rob ;
Milo, Ron .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (25) :6506-6511
[5]   A review of the animal needs index (ANI) for the assessment of animals' well-being in the housing systems for Austrian proprietary products and legislation [J].
Bartussek, H .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1999, 61 (2-3) :179-192
[7]   ANIMAL-WELFARE - CONCEPTS AND MEASUREMENT [J].
BROOM, DM .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1991, 69 (10) :4167-4175
[8]  
Brymer E., 2010, Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport, and Physical Education, V1, P21, DOI [10.1080/18377122.2010.9730328, DOI 10.1080/18377122.2010.9730328]
[9]   How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms [J].
Bunge, M .
PHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2004, 34 (02) :182-210
[10]  
Bunge M.A., 2003, Emergence and convergence: Qualitative novelty and the unity of knowledge