An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies

被引:19
|
作者
Marginean, Felicia [1 ,2 ]
Arvidsson, Ida [3 ]
Simoulis, Athanasios [2 ]
Overgaard, Niels Christian [3 ]
Astrom, Kalle [3 ]
Heyden, Anders [3 ]
Bjartell, Anders [1 ]
Krzyzanowska, Agnieszka [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Translat Med, Div Urol Canc, Jan Waldenstroms Gata 5,Plan 2, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Ctr Math Sci, Lund, Sweden
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 05期
关键词
Convolutional neural network; Machine learning; Deep learning; Prostate cancer; CANCER; CARCINOMA; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2020.11.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Gleason grading is the standard diagnostic method for prostate cancer and is essential for determining prognosis and treatment. The dearth of expert pathologists, the inter-and intraobserver variability, as well as the labour intensity of Gleason grading all necessitate the development of a user-friendly tool for robust standardisation. Objective: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm, based on machine learning and convolutional neural networks, as a tool for improved standardisation in Gleason grading in prostate cancer biopsies. Design, setting, and participants: A total of 698 prostate biopsy sections from 174 patients were used for training. The training sections were annotated by two senior consultant pathologists. The final algorithm was tested on 37 biopsy sections from 21 patients, with digitised slide images from two different scanners. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Correlation, sensitivity, and specificity parameters were calculated. Results and limitations: The algorithm shows high accuracy in detecting cancer areas (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 68%). Compared with the pathologists, the algorithm also performed well in detecting cancer areas (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.99) and assigning the Gleason patterns correctly: Gleason patterns 3 and 4 (ICC: 0.96 and 0.94, respectively), and to a lesser extent, Gleason pattern 5 (ICC: 0.82). Similar results were obtained using two different scanners. Conclusions: Our AI-based algorithm can reliably detect prostate cancer and quantify the Gleason patterns in core needle biopsies, with similar accuracy as pathologists. The results are reproducible on images from different scanners with a proven low level of intraobserver variability. We believe that this AI tool could be regarded as an efficient and interactive tool for pathologists. Patient summary: We developed a sensitive artificial intelligence tool for prostate biopsies, which detects and grades cancer with similar accuracy to pathologists. This tool holds promise to improve the diagnosis of prostate cancer. (c) 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1001
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Melanoma Clinical Decision Support System: An Artificial Intelligence-Based Tool to Diagnose and Predict Disease Outcome in Early-Stage Melanoma Patients
    Diaz-Ramon, Jose Luis
    Gardeazabal, Jesus
    Izu, Rosa Maria
    Garrote, Estibaliz
    Rasero, Javier
    Apraiz, Aintzane
    Penas, Cristina
    Seijo, Sandra
    Lopez-Saratxaga, Cristina
    De la Pena, Pedro Maria
    Sanchez-Diaz, Ana
    Cancho-Galan, Goikoane
    Velasco, Veronica
    Sevilla, Arrate
    Fernandez, David
    Cuenca, Iciar
    Cortes, Jesus Maria
    Alonso, Santos
    Asumendi, Aintzane
    Boyano, Maria Dolores
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [42] Artificial intelligence for detection of prostate cancer in biopsies during active surveillance
    Arvidsson, Ida
    Svanemur, Edvard
    Marginean, Felicia
    Simoulis, Athanasios
    Overgaard, Niels Christian
    Astrom, Kalle
    Heyden, Anders
    Krzyzanowska, Agnieszka
    Bjartell, Anders
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 134 (06) : 1001 - 1009
  • [43] Artificial intelligence-based recurrence prediction outperforms classical histopathological methods in pulmonary adenocarcinoma biopsies
    Akram, F.
    Wolf, J. L.
    Trandafir, T. E.
    Dingemans, Anne-Marie C.
    Stubbs, A. P.
    von der Thusen, J. H.
    LUNG CANCER, 2023, 186
  • [44] Pathology residents' use of a Web-based tutorial to improve Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma on needle biopsies
    Kronz, JD
    Silberman, MA
    Allsbrook, WC
    Bastacky, SI
    Burks, RT
    Cina, SJ
    Mills, SE
    Ross, JS
    Sakr, WA
    Tomaszewski, JE
    True, LD
    Ulbright, TM
    Weinstein, MW
    Yantiss, RK
    Young, RH
    Epstein, JI
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2000, 31 (09) : 1044 - 1050
  • [45] An Artificial Intelligence-Based Support Tool for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Diagnosis from Self-Reported History Questionnaire
    Abel, Frederik
    Garcia, Eugene
    Andreeva, Vera
    Nikolaev, Nikolai S.
    Kolisnyk, Serhii
    Sarbaev, Ruslan
    Novikov, Ivan
    Kozinchenko, Evgeniy
    Kim, Jack
    Rusakov, Andrej
    Mourad, Raphael
    Lebl, Darren R.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 181 : E953 - E962
  • [46] The value of artificial intelligence for detection and grading of prostate cancer in human prostatectomy specimens: a validation study
    Kudo, Maira Suzuka
    Gomes de Souza, Vinicius Meneguette
    Neubarth Estivallet, Carmen Liane
    de Amorim, Henrique Alves
    Kim, Fernando J.
    Moreira Leite, Katia Ramos
    Moraes, Matheus Cardoso
    PATIENT SAFETY IN SURGERY, 2022, 16 (01)
  • [47] Automated Gleason Grading and Gleason Pattern Region Segmentation Based on Deep Learning for Pathological Images of Prostate Cancer
    Li, Yuchun
    Huang, Mengxing
    Zhang, Yu
    Chen, Jing
    Xu, Haixia
    Wang, Gang
    Feng, Wenlong
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 117714 - 117725
  • [48] Development of a prognostic prediction support system for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using artificial intelligence-based diagnosis
    Takahashi, Takayuki
    Matsuoka, Hikaru
    Sakurai, Rieko
    Akatsuka, Jun
    Kobayashi, Yusuke
    Nakamura, Masaru
    Iwata, Takashi
    Banno, Kouji
    Matsuzaki, Motomichi
    Takayama, Jun
    Aoki, Daisuke
    Yamamoto, Yoichiro
    Tamiya, Gen
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 (05)
  • [49] Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Diagnosis with Belief Functions Theory
    Ellouze, Ameni
    Kahouli, Omar
    Ksantini, Mohamed
    Alsaif, Haitham
    Aloui, Ali
    Kahouli, Bassem
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2022, 14 (10):
  • [50] Artificial Intelligence-based Radiomics in the Era of Immuno-Oncology
    Kang, Cyra Y.
    Duarte, Samantha E.
    Kim, Hye Sung
    Kim, Eugene
    Park, Jonghanne
    Lee, Alice Daeun
    Kim, Yeseul
    Kim, Leeseul
    Cho, Sukjoo
    Oh, Yoojin
    Gim, Gahyun
    Park, Inae
    Lee, Dongyup
    Abazeed, Mohamed
    Velichko, Yury S.
    Chae, Young Kwang
    ONCOLOGIST, 2022, 27 (06) : E471 - E483