An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies

被引:19
|
作者
Marginean, Felicia [1 ,2 ]
Arvidsson, Ida [3 ]
Simoulis, Athanasios [2 ]
Overgaard, Niels Christian [3 ]
Astrom, Kalle [3 ]
Heyden, Anders [3 ]
Bjartell, Anders [1 ]
Krzyzanowska, Agnieszka [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Translat Med, Div Urol Canc, Jan Waldenstroms Gata 5,Plan 2, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Ctr Math Sci, Lund, Sweden
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 05期
关键词
Convolutional neural network; Machine learning; Deep learning; Prostate cancer; CANCER; CARCINOMA; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2020.11.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Gleason grading is the standard diagnostic method for prostate cancer and is essential for determining prognosis and treatment. The dearth of expert pathologists, the inter-and intraobserver variability, as well as the labour intensity of Gleason grading all necessitate the development of a user-friendly tool for robust standardisation. Objective: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm, based on machine learning and convolutional neural networks, as a tool for improved standardisation in Gleason grading in prostate cancer biopsies. Design, setting, and participants: A total of 698 prostate biopsy sections from 174 patients were used for training. The training sections were annotated by two senior consultant pathologists. The final algorithm was tested on 37 biopsy sections from 21 patients, with digitised slide images from two different scanners. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Correlation, sensitivity, and specificity parameters were calculated. Results and limitations: The algorithm shows high accuracy in detecting cancer areas (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 68%). Compared with the pathologists, the algorithm also performed well in detecting cancer areas (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.99) and assigning the Gleason patterns correctly: Gleason patterns 3 and 4 (ICC: 0.96 and 0.94, respectively), and to a lesser extent, Gleason pattern 5 (ICC: 0.82). Similar results were obtained using two different scanners. Conclusions: Our AI-based algorithm can reliably detect prostate cancer and quantify the Gleason patterns in core needle biopsies, with similar accuracy as pathologists. The results are reproducible on images from different scanners with a proven low level of intraobserver variability. We believe that this AI tool could be regarded as an efficient and interactive tool for pathologists. Patient summary: We developed a sensitive artificial intelligence tool for prostate biopsies, which detects and grades cancer with similar accuracy to pathologists. This tool holds promise to improve the diagnosis of prostate cancer. (c) 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1001
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma in needle biopsies vs. radical prostatectomy specimens
    Mazzucchelli, R
    Barbisan, F
    Tarquini, LM
    Filosa, A
    Campanini, N
    Galosi, AB
    ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY, 2005, 27 (03): : 125 - 133
  • [32] Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle biopsies vs. radical prostatectomy spectmens
    Vidal-Jimenez, Alfredo
    ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY, 2006, 28 (06): : 340 - 341
  • [33] Artificial Intelligence-Based Smart Quality Inspection for Manufacturing
    Sundaram, Sarvesh
    Zeid, Abe
    MICROMACHINES, 2023, 14 (03)
  • [34] A PYRAMIDAL CNN-BASED GLEASON GRADING SYSTEM USING DIGITIZED PROSTATE BIOPSY SPECIMENS
    Hammouda, K.
    Khalifa, F.
    Ghazal, M.
    Darwish, H. E.
    Yousaf, J.
    El-Baz, A.
    2022 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION (ICPR), 2022, : 4277 - 4284
  • [35] Artificial Intelligence-Based Latency Estimation for Distributed Systems
    Mohammed, Shady A.
    ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 11489 : 609 - 612
  • [36] Artificial intelligence-based masked face detection: A survey
    Hosny, Khalid M.
    Ibrahim, Nada AbdElFattah
    Mohamed, Ehab R.
    Hamza, Hanaa M.
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 22
  • [37] Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle core biopsies: a comparison of general and urologic pathologists
    Al-Maghrabi, Jaudah Ahmed
    Bakshi, Nasir A.
    Farsi, Hasan M. A.
    ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2013, 33 (01) : 40 - 44
  • [38] Artificial Intelligence-Based Prognostic Model for Urologic Cancers: A SEER-Based Study
    Eminaga, Okyaz
    Shkolyar, Eugene
    Breil, Bernhard
    Semjonow, Axel
    Boegemann, Martin
    Xing, Lei
    Tinay, Ilker
    Liao, Joseph C.
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [39] Comparison of Pathologist and Artificial Intelligence-based Grading for Prediction of Metastatic Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy
    Oliveira, Lia D.
    Lu, Jiayun
    Erak, Eric
    Mendes, Adrianna A.
    Dairo, Oluwademilade
    Ertunc, Onur
    Kulac, Ibrahim
    Baena-Del Valle, Javier A.
    Jones, Tracy
    Hicks, Jessica L.
    Glavaris, Stephanie
    Guner, Gunes
    Vidal, Igor D.
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Joshi, Uttara
    Kondragunta, Chaith
    Bonthu, Saikiran
    Joshu, Corinne
    Singhal, Nitin
    De Marzo, Angelo M.
    Lotan, Tamara L.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2025, 8 (01): : 9 - 13
  • [40] Artificial Intelligence-Based Distributed Network Latency Measurement
    Mohammed, Shady A.
    Shirmohammadi, Shervin
    Altamimi, Sa'di
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (I2MTC), 2019, : 891 - 896