An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies

被引:19
|
作者
Marginean, Felicia [1 ,2 ]
Arvidsson, Ida [3 ]
Simoulis, Athanasios [2 ]
Overgaard, Niels Christian [3 ]
Astrom, Kalle [3 ]
Heyden, Anders [3 ]
Bjartell, Anders [1 ]
Krzyzanowska, Agnieszka [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Translat Med, Div Urol Canc, Jan Waldenstroms Gata 5,Plan 2, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Ctr Math Sci, Lund, Sweden
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 05期
关键词
Convolutional neural network; Machine learning; Deep learning; Prostate cancer; CANCER; CARCINOMA; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2020.11.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Gleason grading is the standard diagnostic method for prostate cancer and is essential for determining prognosis and treatment. The dearth of expert pathologists, the inter-and intraobserver variability, as well as the labour intensity of Gleason grading all necessitate the development of a user-friendly tool for robust standardisation. Objective: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm, based on machine learning and convolutional neural networks, as a tool for improved standardisation in Gleason grading in prostate cancer biopsies. Design, setting, and participants: A total of 698 prostate biopsy sections from 174 patients were used for training. The training sections were annotated by two senior consultant pathologists. The final algorithm was tested on 37 biopsy sections from 21 patients, with digitised slide images from two different scanners. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Correlation, sensitivity, and specificity parameters were calculated. Results and limitations: The algorithm shows high accuracy in detecting cancer areas (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 68%). Compared with the pathologists, the algorithm also performed well in detecting cancer areas (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.99) and assigning the Gleason patterns correctly: Gleason patterns 3 and 4 (ICC: 0.96 and 0.94, respectively), and to a lesser extent, Gleason pattern 5 (ICC: 0.82). Similar results were obtained using two different scanners. Conclusions: Our AI-based algorithm can reliably detect prostate cancer and quantify the Gleason patterns in core needle biopsies, with similar accuracy as pathologists. The results are reproducible on images from different scanners with a proven low level of intraobserver variability. We believe that this AI tool could be regarded as an efficient and interactive tool for pathologists. Patient summary: We developed a sensitive artificial intelligence tool for prostate biopsies, which detects and grades cancer with similar accuracy to pathologists. This tool holds promise to improve the diagnosis of prostate cancer. (c) 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1001
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Automatic detection of knee osteoarthritis grading using artificial intelligence-based methods
    Yildirim, Muhammed
    Mutlu, Hursit Burak
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMAGING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 34 (02)
  • [22] Artificial Intelligence-Based Multiclass Classification of Benign or Malignant Mucosal Lesions of the Stomach
    Ma, Bowei
    Guo, Yucheng
    Hu, Weian
    Yuan, Fei
    Zhu, Zhenggang
    Yu, Yingyan
    Zou, Hao
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [23] The artificial intelligence-based model ANORAK improves histopathological grading of lung adenocarcinoma
    Pan, Xiaoxi
    Abduljabbar, Khalid
    Coelho-Lima, Jose
    Grapa, Anca-Ioana
    Zhang, Hanyun
    Cheung, Alvin Ho Kwan
    Baena, Juvenal
    Karasaki, Takahiro
    Wilson, Claire Rachel
    Sereno, Marco
    Veeriah, Selvaraju
    Aitken, Sarah J.
    Hackshaw, Allan
    Nicholson, Andrew G.
    Jamal-Hanjani, Mariam
    Swanton, Charles
    Jamal-Hanjani, Mariam
    Zhang, Hanyun
    AbdulJabbar, Khalid
    Pan, Xiaoxi
    Yuan, Yinyin
    Hackshaw, Allan
    Le Quesne, John
    Veeriah, Selvaraju
    Karasaki, Takahiro
    Janes, Sam M.
    Hacker, Anne-Marie
    Sharp, Abigail
    Smith, Sean
    Dhanda, Harjot Kaur
    Chan, Kitty
    Pilotti, Camilla
    Leslie, Rachel
    Grapa, Anca-Ioana
    Chuter, David
    Mackenzie, Mairead
    Chee, Serena
    Alzetani, Aiman
    Lim, Eric
    De Sousa, Paulo
    Jordan, Simon
    Rice, Alexandra
    Raubenheimer, Hilgardt
    Bhayani, Harshil
    Ambrose, Lyn
    Devaraj, Anand
    Chavan, Hema
    Begum, Sofina
    Buderi, Silviu I.
    Kaniu, Daniel
    NATURE CANCER, 2024, 5 (2) : 347 - 363
  • [24] Artificial Intelligence-Based Speech Analysis System for Medical Support
    Kim, Eui-Sun
    Shin, Dong Jin
    Cho, Sung Tae
    Chung, Kyung Jin
    INTERNATIONAL NEUROUROLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 27 (02) : 99 - 105
  • [25] An Artificial Intelligence-based tool to predict "unhealthy" wine and olive oil
    Aiello, Gilda
    Tosi, Davide
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2024, 16
  • [26] Artificial intelligence-based classification of echocardiographic views
    Naser, Jwan A.
    Lee, Eunjung
    Pislaru, Sorin, V
    Tsaban, Gal
    Malins, Jeffrey G.
    Jackson, John, I
    Anisuzzaman, D. M.
    Rostami, Behrouz
    Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco
    Friedman, Paul A.
    Kane, Garvan C.
    Pellikka, Patricia A.
    Attia, Zachi, I
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL - DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 5 (03): : 260 - 269
  • [27] Explainable Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support Systems: A Recent Review
    Kostopoulos, Georgios
    Davrazos, Gregory
    Kotsiantis, Sotiris
    ELECTRONICS, 2024, 13 (14)
  • [28] Identification of areas of grading difficulties in prostate cancer and comparison with artificial intelligence assisted grading
    Egevad, Lars
    Swanberg, Daniela
    Delahunt, Brett
    Strom, Peter
    Kartasalo, Kimmo
    Olsson, Henrik
    Berney, Dan M.
    Bostwick, David G.
    Evans, Andrew J.
    Humphrey, Peter A.
    Iczkowski, Kenneth A.
    Kench, James G.
    Kristiansen, Glen
    Leite, Katia R. M.
    McKenney, Jesse K.
    Oxley, Jon
    Pan, Chin-Chen
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Srigley, John R.
    Takahashi, Hiroyuki
    Tsuzuki, Toyonori
    van der Kwast, Theo
    Varma, Murali
    Zhou, Ming
    Clements, Mark
    Eklund, Martin
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2020, 477 (06) : 777 - 786
  • [29] Artificial intelligence-based techniques for analysis of body cavity fluids: a review
    Mir, Aftab Ahmad
    Sarwar, Abid
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2021, 54 (06) : 4019 - 4061
  • [30] Artificial Intelligence-Based Opportunities in Liver Pathology-A Systematic Review
    Allaume, Pierre
    Rabilloud, Noemie
    Turlin, Bruno
    Bardou-Jacquet, Edouard
    Loreal, Olivier
    Calderaro, Julien
    Khene, Zine-Eddine
    Acosta, Oscar
    De Crevoisier, Renaud
    Rioux-Leclercq, Nathalie
    Pecot, Thierry
    Kammerer-Jacquet, Solene-Florence
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (10)