Responses of methane production, microbial community and antibiotic resistance genes to the mixing ratio of gentamicin mycelial residues and wheat straw in anaerobic co-digestion process

被引:19
|
作者
Jiang, Mingye [1 ]
Song, Siqi [1 ]
Liu, Huiling [2 ]
Dai, Xiaohu [2 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Urban Water Resources & Environm, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gentamicin mycelial residues; Anaerobic co-digestion; Methanosaeta; Methanogenic pathway; Antibiotic resistance genes; DISSOLVED ORGANIC-MATTER; SP-NOV; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; IV SECRETION; SLUDGE; WASTE; PRETREATMENT; BACTERIAL; IMPACT; DEGRADATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150488
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) of gentamicin mycelial residues (GMRs), a kind of nitrogen-rich biowaste, and wheat straw (WS) is an attractive technology for the recycling of GMRs. However, the effects of the co substrate ratio on methane production, system stability and antimicrobial resistance during co-digestion remain unclear. Thus, this study aimed to fill in the blanks through AcoD of GMRs and WS with different mixing ratios (1:0, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, 0:1, VS basis) via batch tests. Results showed that AcoD facilitated methane production than mono anaerobic digestion and reduced the accumulation of the toxic substances, such as ammonia nitrogen and humic-like substances. The maximum methane production was obtained at the reactors with the mixing ratio of 1:1 and 1:2 (R-1:1 and R-1:2), which matched with the relative abundance of key enzymes related to methanogenesis predicted by PICRUSt. Microbial community analysis indicated that Methanosaeta was the most dominant methanogen in the AcoD reactors. The highest relative abundance of Methanosaeta (45.1%) was obtained at R-1:1 due to the appropriate AcoD conditions, thus, providing greater possibilities for high stability of AcoD system. Additionally, AcoD of the GMRs and WS under the mixing ratio of 1:1 and 1:2 did not prompt the increase of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Not only that, the likelihood of horizontal gene transfer declined in R-1:1 due to the weaker connection and transport between host and recipient bacteria. Findings of this study suggested that the suitable mixing ratio of GMRs and WS contributes to methane production and system stability, and reduces the dissemination risks of ARGs. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of sludge with fruit and vegetable wastes: effect of mixing ratio and inoculum type
    Mahmoud Elsayed
    Asmaa Diab
    Mohamed Soliman
    Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2021, 11 : 989 - 998
  • [32] Optimization of methane production in a swine manure–rice straw anaerobic co-digestion process with sycamore sawdust biochar application
    B. Jiang
    Y. Lin
    Y. Lun
    Z. Xu
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2021, 18 : 2197 - 2208
  • [33] Start-up of co-digestion of poultry litter and wheat straw in anaerobic sequencing batch reactor by gradually increasing organic loading rate: Methane production and microbial community analysis
    Zhan, Yuanhang
    Cao, Xiaoxia
    Xiao, Yiting
    Wei, Xiaoyuan
    Wu, Sarah
    Zhu, Jun
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 354
  • [34] Effects of cow manure ratios on methane production and microbial community evolution in anaerobic co-digestion with different crop wastes
    Hao, Jianjun
    Jia, Shufei
    Sun, Hao
    Chen, Gaopan
    Zhang, Jiaxing
    Zhao, Yubin
    Song, Yang
    Zhao, Jianguo
    Wang, Yaya
    Liu, Shuang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 15 (05) : 219 - 228
  • [35] Enzyme pretreatments for anaerobic co-digestion of food waste blended with bioplastics: effects on methane production and microbial community structure
    Jiang, Xintong
    Bi, Dongsu
    Cheng, Yu
    Wang, Shizhuo
    Peng, Bo-yu
    Shen, Haowen
    Zhang, Tao
    Xia, Xuefen
    Shen, Zheng
    Zhang, Yalei
    NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2023, 47 (45) : 20846 - 20858
  • [36] Anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and cardboard waste: Focusing on methane production, microbial community analysis and energy evaluation
    Zhao, Shunan
    Chen, Wenhan
    Luo, Wendan
    Fang, Hongli
    Lv, Huanyu
    Liu, Rutao
    Niu, Qigui
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 321
  • [37] Anaerobic co-digestion of linen, sugar beet pulp, and wheat straw with cow manure: effects of mixing ratio and transient change of co-substrate
    Mahmoud Elsayed
    Yves Andres
    Walid Blel
    Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2023, 13 : 11831 - 11840
  • [38] Study on the bio-methane yield and microbial community structure in enzyme enhanced anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure and corn straw
    Wang, Xuemei
    Li, Zifu
    Zhou, Xiaoqin
    Wang, Qiqi
    Wu, Yanga
    Saino, Mayiani
    Bai, Xue
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 219 : 150 - 157
  • [39] Anaerobic co-digestion of linen, sugar beet pulp, and wheat straw with cow manure: effects of mixing ratio and transient change of co-substrate
    Elsayed, Mahmoud
    Andres, Yves
    Blel, Walid
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2023, 13 (13) : 11831 - 11840
  • [40] Optimization of methane production in a swine manure-rice straw anaerobic co-digestion process with sycamore sawdust biochar application
    Jiang, B.
    Lin, Y.
    Lun, Y.
    Xu, Z.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 18 (08) : 2197 - 2208