MRI-Detectability of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Relates to Oncologic Outcomes After Prostatectomy

被引:14
作者
Wibmer, Andreas G. [1 ]
Lefkowitz, Robert A. [1 ]
Lakhman, Yulia [1 ]
Chaim, Joshua [1 ]
Nikolovski, Ines [1 ]
Sala, Evis [1 ,5 ]
Fine, Samson W. [2 ]
Donahue, Timothy F. [3 ]
Kattan, Michael W. [4 ]
Hricak, Hedvig [1 ]
Vargas, Hebert Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, New York, NY 10065 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge, England
关键词
Prostate cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostatectomy; Biochemical recurrence; Cancer specific mortality; Metastatic disease; Prognosis; INTERMEDIATE; BIOPSY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.clgc.2022.04.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction/Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) misses a proportion of "clinically significant" prostate cancers (csPC) as defined by histopathology criteria. The aim of this study was to analyze whether long-term oncologic outcomes differ between MRI-detectable and MRI-occult csPC. Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 1449 patients with pre-prostatectomy MRI and csPC on prostatectomy specimens (ie, Grade group >2 or extraprostatic spread) between 2001-2006. T2-weighted MRIs were classified according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System into MRI-occult (categories 1, 2), MRI-equivocal (category 3), and MRI-detectable (categories 4, 5). Cumulative incidence of biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastatic disease, and cancer-specific mortality, estimated with competing risk models. The median follow-up in survivors was 11.0 years (IQR: 8.9-13.1). Results: In 188 (13%) cases, csPC was MRI-occult, 435 (30%) MRIs were equivocal, and 826 (57%) csPC were MRI-detectable. The 15-year cumulative incidence [95% CI] of BCR was 8.3% [2.2, 19.5] for MRI-occult cases, 17.4% [11.1, 24.8] for MRI-equivocal cases, and 43.3% [38.7, 47.8] for MRI-detectable cases (P < .001). The cumulative incidences of metastases were 0.61% [0.06, 3.1], 3.5% [1.5, 6.9], and 19.6% [15.4, 242] for MRI-occult, MRI-equivocal, and MRI-detectable cases, respectively (P .001). There were no deaths from prostate cancer observed in patients with MRI-occult csPC, compared to an estimated 1.9% [0.54, 4.9], and 7.1 % [4.5, 10.6] for patients with MRI-equivocal and MRI-detectable cancer, respectively (P .001). Conclusion: Oncologic outcomes after prostatectomy for csPC differ between MRI-occult and MRI-detectable lesions. Judging the clinical significance of a negative prostate MRI based on histopathologic surrogates alone might be misleading.Microabstract: Among 1449 patients with pre-prostatectomy MRI and clinically significant prostate cancer on prostatectomy histopathology, MRI-occult cancers (n = 188, 13%) were less likely to recur biochemically (8% vs. 43%, P < .001), metastasize (0.6% vs. 20%, P < .001), or lead to prostate cancer mortality (0% vs. 7%, P < .001) than MRI-detectable cancers (n = 826, 57%). MRI-occult cancers constitute a prognostically distinct subgroup among higher-grade prostate cancers. (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 325
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Interactive dedicated training curriculum improves accuracy in the interpretation of MR imaging of prostate cancer
    Akin, Oguz
    Riedl, Christopher C.
    Ishill, Nicole M.
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Zhang, Jingbo
    Hricak, Hedvig
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (04) : 995 - 1002
  • [2] A Systematic Review of the Existing Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Literature and Subset Meta-Analysis of PI-RADSv2 Categories Stratified by Gleason Scores
    Barkovich, Emil Jernstedt
    Shankar, Prasad R.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (04) : 847 - 854
  • [3] Barqawi AB, 2011, INT J CLIN EXP PATHO, V4, P468
  • [4] The Value of Mandatory Second Opinion Pathology Review of Prostate Needle Biopsy Interpretation Before Radical Prostatectomy
    Brimo, Fadi
    Schultz, Luciana
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (01) : 126 - 130
  • [5] Can We Improve the Preoperative Prediction of Prostate Cancer Recurrence With Multiparametric MRI?
    Capogrosso, Paolo
    Vertosick, Emily A.
    Benfante, Nicole E.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Eastham, James A.
    [J]. CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (04) : E745 - E750
  • [6] Re: Use of Prostate Systematic and Targeted Biopsy on the Basis of Multiparametric MRI in Biopsy-naive Patients (MRI-FIRST): A Prospective, Multicentre, Paired Diagnostic Study Rouviere O, Puech P, Renard-Penna R, et al Lancet Oncol 2019;20: 100-9
    Carlsson, Sigrid V.
    Eastham, James A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (04) : 534 - 535
  • [7] Comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: The Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience and an international meta-analysis
    Cohen, Michael S.
    Hanley, Robert S.
    Kurteva, Teodora
    Ruthazer, Robin
    Silverman, Mark L.
    Sorcini, Andrea
    Hamawy, Karim
    Roth, Robert A.
    Tuerk, Ingolf
    Libertino, John A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (02) : 371 - 381
  • [8] Comparative analysis of prostate-specific antigen free survival outcomes for patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treatment by radical therapy. Results from the Prostate Cancer Results Study Group
    Grimm, Peter
    Billiet, Ignace
    Bostwick, David
    Dicker, Adam P.
    Frank, Steven
    Immerzeel, Jos
    Keyes, Mira
    Kupelian, Patrick
    Lee, W. Robert
    Machtens, Stefan
    Mayadev, Jyoti
    Moran, Brian J.
    Merrick, Gregory
    Millar, Jeremy
    Roach, Mack
    Stock, Richard
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Scholz, Mark
    Weber, Ed
    Zietman, Anthony
    Zelefsky, Michael
    Wong, Jason
    Wentworth, Stacy
    Vera, Robyn
    Langley, Stephen
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 : 22 - 29
  • [9] Holmberg Lars, 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, P230, DOI 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs025
  • [10] Prediction of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients who underwent prostatectomy using routine clinical prostate multiparametric MRI and decipher genomic score
    Jambor, Ivan
    Falagario, Ugo
    Ratnani, Parita
    Perez, Ileana Montoya
    Demir, Kadir
    Merisaari, Harri
    Sobotka, Stanislaw
    Haines, George K.
    Martini, Alberto
    Beksac, Alp Tuna
    Lewis, Sara
    Pahikkala, Tapio
    Wiklund, Peter
    Nair, Sujit
    Tewari, Ash
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 51 (04) : 1075 - 1085