Subjective photic phenomena with refractive multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses -: Results of a multicenter questionnaire

被引:77
作者
Häring, G
Dick, HB
Krummenauer, F
Weissmantel, U
Kröncke, W
机构
[1] Univ Kiel, Dept Ophthalmol, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
[2] Univ Mainz, Dept Ophthalmol, D-6500 Mainz, Germany
[3] Univ Mainz, Dept Med Stat & Documentat, D-6500 Mainz, Germany
[4] St Vincentius Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Karlsruhe, Germany
[5] St Joseph Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Bremerhaven, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00540-X
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the incidence and severity of photic phenomena after the implantation of the Array(R) (Allergan) refractive multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) and a monofocal IOL. Setting: Multicenter study at Kiel, Mainz, Karlsruhe, and Bremerhaven, Germany. Methods: The study comprised 231 randomly selected patients from 4 study centers. The patients had had uneventful phacoemulsification with implantation of a refractive MIOL (n = 138) or a monofocal IOL (n = 93). By questionnaire, patients were asked whether they experienced light sensations postoperatively (light streaks, halos, Rare, flashes, or glare) that had not been noticed preoperatively. Additional questions evaluated whether these phenomena had changed over time and how much they affected the patients' quality of life. Results: Overall, 9% of patients with a monofocal IOL and 41% of those with an MIOL reported photic phenomena that had not been noticed before cataract surgery. Halos and flare were mentioned significantly more often by patients with MIOLs than by those with monofocal IOLs. There was no significant between-group difference in the mention of flashes. Eighteen percent of patients with MIOLs and 4% with monofocal IOLs were slightly or moderately bothered by the photic phenomena, whereas 5% of patients with MIOLs and none in the monofocal group were severely disturbed by the light sensations. Conclusion: Subjective photic phenomena were experienced significantly more often by patients who had refractive MIOLs than by those who had monofocal IOLs. The differences in the results of the 4 study centers were probably influenced by different patient selection criteria for the implantation of MIOLs. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27:245-249 (C) 2001 ASCRS and ESCRS.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 249
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[2]   Objective and subjective evaluation of photic phenomena after monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens implantation [J].
Dick, HB ;
Krummenauer, F ;
Schwenn, O ;
Krist, R ;
Pfeiffer, N .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 106 (10) :1878-1886
[3]   Glare sensitivity in patients with phakic and pseudophakic eyes [J].
Eisenmann, D ;
Jacobi, FK ;
Dick, B ;
Jacobi, KW ;
Pabst, W .
KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 1996, 208 (02) :87-92
[4]   EXPLANATION OF 3M DIFFRACTIVE INTRAOCULAR LENSES [J].
ELLINGSON, FT .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1990, 16 (06) :697-702
[5]  
HART WM, 1987, ADLERS PHYSL EYE, P373
[6]   OPTICAL-PERFORMANCE OF MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES [J].
HOLLADAY, JT ;
VANDIJK, H ;
LANG, A ;
PORTNEY, V ;
WILLIS, TR ;
SUN, R ;
OKSMAN, HC .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1990, 16 (04) :413-422
[7]  
JACOBI FK, 1995, EUR J IMPLANT REF SU, V7, P214
[8]   Outcomes of cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation - Functional status and quality of life [J].
Javitt, JC ;
Wang, F ;
Trentacost, DJ ;
Rowe, M ;
Tarantino, N .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 104 (04) :589-599
[9]   GLARE FOLLOWING POSTERIOR CHAMBER INTRAOCULAR-LENS IMPLANTATION [J].
KOCH, DD ;
JARDELEZA, TL ;
EMERY, JM ;
FRANKLIN, D .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1986, 12 (05) :480-484
[10]   UNDESIRED LIGHT IMAGES ASSOCIATED WITH OVOID INTRAOCULAR LENSES [J].
MASKET, S ;
GERAGHTY, E ;
CRANDALL, AS ;
DAVISON, JA ;
JOHNSON, SH ;
KOCH, DD ;
LANE, SS .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 19 (06) :690-694