Modulated Model Predictive Control for MMC-Based Active Front-End Rectifiers Under Unbalanced Grid Conditions

被引:90
作者
Gong, Zheng [1 ]
Wu, Xiaojie [1 ]
Dai, Peng [1 ]
Zhu, Rongwu [2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Jiangsu Prov Lab Min Elect & Automat, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Chritian Albrechts Univ Kiel, Chair Power Elect, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
关键词
Circulating current suppression; modular multilevel converter (MMC); model predictive control (MPC); steady-state performance; unbalanced grid conditions; MULTILEVEL CONVERTER; CASCADED CONTROL; CONTROL SCHEME; HVDC SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1109/TIE.2018.2844836
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Modular multilevel converters (MMCs) have been widely used in recent years due to their superior advantages in medium/high-voltage applications. The finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) has shown high dynamic responses for the control of the MMC. However, with the existing FCS-MPC algorithms, the steady-state performances are degraded due to the irregular pulse patterns, especially under unbalanced grid conditions. In this paper, based on the discrete state-space model of the MMC, a modulated MPC (M2PC) algorithm is proposed to overcome the aforementioned drawback of the FCS-MPC. Compared to FCS-MPC algorithms, the M2PC accurately calculates and tracks the reference circulating current and adopts an effective modulation method, and, in turn, the proposed M2PC can obtain enhanced steady-state ac-side/circulating currents control performances under unbalanced grid conditions, with the high dynamic-state performances of the conventional FCS-MPC algorithms reserved. Experimental results regarding one typical FCS-MPC algorithm and the proposed M2PC algorithm are comparatively evaluated in detail for the steady/dynamic-state performances and pulse patterns by a downscaled prototype. The effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed M2PC are clearly validated by the experimental results.
引用
收藏
页码:2398 / 2409
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SUST POW SUPPL EC PO
[2]  
[Anonymous], IEEE T POWER ELECT
[3]  
[Anonymous], P 10 INT C AC DC POW
[4]  
[Anonymous], SINAMICS SM120 CAB M
[5]  
Antonopoulos A, 2012, IEEE ENER CONV, P739, DOI 10.1109/ECCE.2012.6342746
[6]   Circulating Current Suppression of the Modular Multilevel Converter in a Double-Frequency Rotating Reference Frame [J].
Bahrani, Behrooz ;
Debnath, Suman ;
Saeedifard, Maryam .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2016, 31 (01) :783-792
[7]   Experimental Comparison of Model Predictive Control and Cascaded Control of the Modular Multilevel Converter [J].
Boecker, Jan ;
Freudenberg, Benjamin ;
The, Andrew ;
Dieckerhoff, Sibylle .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2015, 30 (01) :422-430
[8]   Predictive Control of an Indirect Matrix Converter [J].
Correa, Pablo ;
Rodriguez, Jose ;
Rivera, Marco ;
Espinoza, Jose R. ;
Kolar, Johann W. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2009, 56 (06) :1847-1853
[9]   Operation, Control, and Applications of the Modular Multilevel Converter: A Review [J].
Debnath, Suman ;
Qin, Jiangchao ;
Bahrani, Behrooz ;
Saeedifard, Maryam ;
Barbosa, Peter .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2015, 30 (01) :37-53
[10]  
Geng SB, 2016, APPL POWER ELECT CO, P3560, DOI 10.1109/APEC.2016.7468380