Tensions in current curriculum reform and the development of teachers' professional autonomy

被引:10
作者
Hughes, Sioned [1 ]
Lewis, Helen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wales Trinity St David, Carmarthen, Dyfed, Wales
[2] Swansea Univ, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
关键词
curriculum reform; teacher agency; pedagogy; professional development;
D O I
10.1002/curj.25
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Current curriculum reform in Wales provides an opportunity for teachers to have greater freedom to develop pedagogical approaches that meet the needs of their pupils. The Successful Futures report recommends that teachers should have a greater autonomy in choosing how to deliver the curriculum, and ensuring it is done so in a manner that is meaningful and relevant to their pupils. Strengthening teachers' agency in relation to pedagogy, however, can sometimes be difficult to achieve because, for example, of perceived issues around workload and accountability. There are many 'off-the-peg' or ready-made solutions to the challenges of curriculum reform, and in many cases, schools are responding to such challenges using ready-made or bespoke approaches. This paper explores the nature of the tensions between the drive to empower professional contributions to curriculum reform, and increase autonomy for teachers, and the existing professional practices. In particular, as an example of the tensions, the paper considers how and why one school selected a commercial mindfulness package to contribute to the newly defined Health and Wellbeing Area of Experience, and the implication of this choice on teacher autonomy and pedagogical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 302
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Alkan S., 2018, EUR C ED RES BOLZ 4
  • [2] Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective
    Bandura, A
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 : 1 - 26
  • [3] Banerjee R., 2016, Promoting Emotional Health, Well-Being, and Resilience in Primary Schools
  • [4] Teachers, Curriculum Innovation, and Policy Formation
    Bascia, Nina
    Carr-Harris, Shasta
    Fine-Meyer, Rose
    Zurzolo, Cara
    [J]. CURRICULUM INQUIRY, 2014, 44 (02) : 228 - 248
  • [5] Biesta G.J., 2004, Educational Theory, V54, P233, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.0013-2004.2004.00017.X
  • [6] British Educational Research Association, 2018, BERA Ethical Guidelines: British Educational Research Association Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research
  • [7] Educative Curriculum Materials: Uptake, Impact, and Implications for Research and Design
    Davis, Elizabeth A.
    Palincsar, Annemarie Sullivan
    Smith, P. Sean
    Arias, Anna Maria
    Kademian, Sylvie M.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2017, 46 (06) : 293 - 304
  • [8] Donaldson G., 2015, Successful futures: Independent review of curriculum and assessment arrangements in Wales
  • [9] *ED WAL, 2017, ED WAL OUR NAT MISS
  • [10] What is agency?
    Emirbayer, M
    Mische, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1998, 103 (04) : 962 - 1023