Establishing the island of stability for superheavy nuclei via the dynamical cluster-decay model applied to a hot fusion reaction 48Ca+238U→286112*

被引:15
|
作者
Niyti [1 ]
Gupta, Raj K. [1 ]
Greiner, Walter [2 ]
机构
[1] Punjab Univ, Dept Phys, Chandigarh 160014, India
[2] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Frankfurt Inst Adv Studies, D-60438 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
BINARY DECAY; DEFORMATION; FISSION; MASSES; HEAVY; LIGHT;
D O I
10.1088/0954-3899/37/11/115103
中图分类号
O57 [原子核物理学、高能物理学];
学科分类号
070202 ;
摘要
Considering different magic shells such as Z = 126, 120 or 114, N = 184 or Z = 120, N = 172 for the superheavy mass region, the dynamical cluster-decay model (DCM), with deformation and orientation degrees of freedom of colliding nuclei or decay fragments included, is used to study the complete excitation functions of a 'non-equatorial' compact hot-fusion reaction Ca-48+U-238 ->(286)112* (orientation angle theta(c) = 72 degrees for U-238; theta(c) = 90 degrees for 'equatorial' compact). For the higher multipole deformations taken up to hexadecapole deformations beta(4i) and configurations with 'compact' orientations theta(ci), the DCM gives a good description of the individual light-particle decay channels sigma(xn) (x = 3 and 4 neutrons), and other decay channels, the fusion-fission sigma(ff) and quasi-fission sigma(qf) cross-sections, at various incident energies or compound nucleus excitation energies E*, within a single parameter description, the neck-length parameter Delta R. Within the Strutinsly renormalization procedure, in each case, the shell corrections are obtained from an 'empirical' formula with the corresponding liquid-drop energies adjusted to give the experimental binding energies. This is done for all the mass (and charge) fragmentations of the compound system. Of all the four choices of magic numbers considered, the evaporation residue cross-sections (sigma(ER) = sigma(3n) + sigma(4n), the sum of light-particle, neutron-channel cross-sections) remain the largest and nearly the same for Z = 126, N = 184 or Z = 120, N = 184, but the fusion-fission cross-sections sigma(ff) are always the highest for Z = 120, N = 184. Noting that the quasi-fission process is not affected by the magicity of shells, this study supports Z = 120 and N = 184 as the strongest magic numbers for the center of an island of stability for superheavy elements.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Island of stability for superheavy elements and the dynamical cluster-decay model for fusion evaporation residue cross sections: 48Ca+238U→286112*as an example
    Gupta, Raj K.
    Niyti
    Manhas, Monika
    Greiner, Walter
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS G-NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (11)
  • [2] Dynamics of 40,48Ca+238U → 278,286112*reactions across the Coulomb barrier using dynamical cluster decay model
    Sandhu, Kirandeep
    Kaur, Gurvinder
    Sharma, Manoj K.
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 2014, 921 : 114 - 130
  • [3] Fusion-evaporation residues and α-decay chains of the superheavy element Z=115 formed in the 243Am+48Ca reaction using the dynamical cluster-decay model
    Kumar, Raj
    Sandhu, Kirandeep
    Sharma, Manoj K.
    Gupta, Raj K.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2013, 87 (05):
  • [4] Decay of the compound nucleus 297118*formed in the reaction 249Cf+48Ca using the dynamical cluster-decay model
    Sawhney, Gudveen
    Kaur, Amandeep
    Sharma, Manoj K.
    Gupta, Raj K.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2015, 92 (06):
  • [5] Possibility to form Z=120 via the 64Ni + 238U reaction using the dynamical cluster-decay model
    Chopra, Sahila
    Sharma, Manoj K.
    Hess, Peter Oto
    Bedi, Jasleen
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2022, 105 (01)
  • [6] DECAY OF 202Pb* FORMED IN 48Ca+154Sm REACTION USING THE DYNAMICAL CLUSTER-DECAY MODEL
    Kanwar, Shefali
    Sharma, Manoj K.
    Singh, Birbikram
    Gupta, Raj K.
    Greiner, Walter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS E, 2009, 18 (07): : 1453 - 1467
  • [7] 48Ca-induced reaction on the lanthanide target 154Gd and its decay to ground and metastable states within the dynamical cluster-decay model
    Kaushal, Pooja
    Kaur, Arshdeep
    Hemdeep
    Chopra, Sahila
    Gupta, Raj K.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2018, 98 (01)