Can green behaviors really be increased for all employees? Trade-offs for "deep greens" in a goal-oriented green human resource management intervention

被引:70
作者
Davis, Matthew C. [1 ]
Unsworth, Kerrie L. [1 ]
Russell, Sally V. [2 ]
Galvan, Jennifer J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Sustainabil Res Inst, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
crowding out; employee green behavior; goal setting; green HRM; motivation; pro-environmental behaviors; PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; CREATIVE PERFORMANCE; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; SETTING PROCESS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FEEDBACK; REWARDS; COMMITMENT; WORK;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2367
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study explores the complex interaction between psychological and goal-relevant boundary conditions that influence levels of individual engagement in a green human resource management (HRM) intervention designed to encourage employee green behavior (EGB). Data were collected from 1,112 employees in an automobile manufacturing plant. Consistent with goal-setting theory, the level of feedback received predicts EGB. However, a three-way interaction demonstrates how employees with high levels of autonomous motivation do not gain the expected benefits of high feedback and high goal commitment in the enactment of EGB. Instead, only those with weak autonomous motivation are affected by these goal-related constructs. Findings suggest that both goal-setting and self-determination theories are relevant to green HRM interventions. Managers should consider that interventions that are effective for employees who do not have strong autonomous motivation towards the environment may not be effective for those who do.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 346
页数:12
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents [J].
Abrahamse, Wokje ;
Steg, Linda ;
Vlek, Charles ;
Rothengatter, Talib .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 27 (04) :265-276
[2]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, DOI DOI 10.2307/2348581
[3]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[4]   Old friends, new faces: Motivation research in the 1990s [J].
Ambrose, ML ;
Kulik, CT .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1999, 25 (03) :231-292
[5]   Greening organizational behavior: An introduction to the special issue [J].
Andersson, Lynne ;
Jackson, Susan E. ;
Russell, Sally V. .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2013, 34 (02) :151-155
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PSYCHOL GREEN ORGAN
[7]   TESTING MULTIPLICATIVE MODELS DOES NOT REQUIRE RATIO SCALES [J].
ARNOLD, HJ ;
EVANS, MG .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1979, 24 (01) :41-59
[8]   Relationships between daily affect and pro-environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitude [J].
Bissing-Olson, Megan J. ;
Iyer, Aarti ;
Fielding, Kelly S. ;
Zacher, Hannes .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2013, 34 (02) :156-175
[9]   Tacit knowledge and environmental management [J].
Boiral, O .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2002, 35 (03) :291-317
[10]   Leading by Example: A Model of Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment [J].
Boiral, Olivier ;
Talbot, David ;
Paille, Pascal .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 24 (06) :532-550