Post-operative pain after ultrasound transversus abdominis plane block versus trocar site infiltration in laparoscopic nephrectomy: a prospective study

被引:1
作者
Araujo, Ana M. [1 ]
Guimaraes, Joana [1 ]
Nunes, Catarina S. [2 ,3 ]
Couto, Paula S. [1 ]
Amadeu, Eduarda [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Porto, Dept Anestesiol Emergencia & Cuidados Intens, Oporto, Portugal
[2] Univ Aberta, Dept Ciencias & Tecnol, Oporto, Portugal
[3] Ctr Hosp Porto, Ctr Invest Anestesiol Clin, Oporto, Portugal
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA | 2017年 / 67卷 / 05期
关键词
Multimodel analgesia; Laprascopic nephrectomy; Ultrasound; Transversus; abdominis plane block; INTRAPERITONEAL; ANALGESIA; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjan.2016.08.008
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is useful in reducing post-operative pain in laparoscopic nephrectomy compared to placebo. The purpose of this work is to compare post-operative pain and recovery after TAP block or trocar site infiltration (TSI) in this surgery. Methods: A prospective, single blinded study on patients scheduled for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Patients were assigned to two groups: TSI Group: trocar site infiltration at the end of surgery; TAP Group: unilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block after induction. Sevoflurane and remifentanit, in a target controlled infusion mode, were used for maintenance of general anesthesia. Before the end of surgery paracetamol, tramadol and morphine were administered. Visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100 ram) at rest and with cough was applied in three moments: in recovery room (T1 at admission and T2 before discharge) and 24h after surgery (T3). Pain scores with incentive spirometer were also evaluated at T3. In recovery, morphine was administered as a rescue drug whenever VAS > 30 mm. Time to oral intake, chair sitting, ambulation and length of hospital stay were evaluated 24 h after surgery. Statistical analysis: Student's t-test and Chi-square test, and linear regression models. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Data are presented as mean (SD). Results: Forty patients were enrolled in the study. The primary outcome variable. VAS pain scores did not show a statistical significant difference between groups (p>0.05). VAS at rest (TAP vs. TSI groups) was: T1 =33 +/- 29 vs. 39 +/- 32, T2= 10 +/- 9 vs. 17 +/- 18 and T3 =7 +/- 12 vs. 10 +/- 18. VAS with cough (TAP vs. TS' groups) was: Ti = 51 +/- 34 vs. 45 +/- 32, T2 =24 +/- 24 vs. 1+2 and T3 =20 +/- 23 vs. 23 +/- 23. VAS with incentive spirometer (TAP vs. TSI groups) was: T3 =21 +/- 27 vs. 21 +/- 25. Intraoperative remifentanil consumption was similar between TAP (0.16 +/- 0.07 mcg.kg(-1).min(-1)) and TSI (0.18 +0.9 mg.kg(-1).min(-1)) groups. There were no differences in opioid consumption between TAP (4.4 +/- 3.49 mg) and TSI (6.87 +/- 4.83 mg) groups during recovery. Functional recovery parameters were not statistically different between groups. Conclusions: Multimodal analgesia with TAP block did not show a significant clinical benefit compared with trocar site infiltration in laparoscopic nephrectomies. (C) 2016 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 492
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Acar C, 2014, UROL J, V11, P1944
[2]   The effect of intraperitoneal local anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Boddy, Alexander P. ;
Mehta, Samir ;
Rhodes, Michael .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 103 (03) :682-688
[3]   A Dose-Ranging Study of the Effect of Transversus Abdominis Block on Postoperative Quality of Recovery and Analgesia After Outpatient Laparoscopy [J].
De Oliveira, Gildasio S., Jr. ;
Fitzgerald, Paul C. ;
Marcus, R-Jay ;
Ahmad, Shireen ;
McCarthy, Robert J. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 113 (05) :1218-1225
[4]   Laparoscopic Living-Donor Nephrectomy: Analysis of the Existing Literature [J].
Greco, Francesco ;
Hoda, M. Raschid ;
Alcaraz, Antonio ;
Bachmann, Alexander ;
Hakenberg, Oliver W. ;
Fornara, Paolo .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 58 (04) :498-509
[5]   Randomized Clinical Trial of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Placebo Control in Live-Donor Nephrectomy [J].
Hosgood, Sarah A. ;
Thiyagarajan, Umasanker M. ;
Nicholson, Harriet F. L. ;
Jeyapalan, Inthira ;
Nicholson, Michael L. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 94 (05) :520-525
[6]  
Moiniche S, 2000, ANESTH ANALG, V90, P899
[7]  
ORTIZ J, 2014, J MINIM INVASIVE SUR, V3
[8]  
Parikh Beena K, 2013, Saudi J Anaesth, V7, P43, DOI 10.4103/1658-354X.109808
[9]   The transversus abdominis plane block: a valuable option for postoperative analgesia? A topical review [J].
Petersen, P. L. ;
Mathiesen, O. ;
Torup, H. ;
Dahl, J. B. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 54 (05) :529-535
[10]  
Ripollés J, 2015, REV BRAS ANESTESIOL, V65, P255, DOI [10.1016/j.bjane.2013.10.016, 10.1016/j.bjan.2013.10.014]