Oral mucositis associated with anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: single institutional retrospective cohort study

被引:14
|
作者
Dote, Satoshi [1 ,2 ]
Itakura, Shoji [3 ]
Kamei, Kohei [1 ]
Hira, Daiki [2 ,4 ]
Noda, Satoshi [2 ]
Kobayashi, Yuka [1 ]
Terada, Tomohiro [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Katsura Hosp, Dept Pharm, Nishikyo Ku, 17 Yamadahiraocho, Kyoto, Kyoto 6158256, Japan
[2] Shiga Univ Med Sci Hosp, Dept Pharm, Seta Tsukinowa Cho, Otsu, Shiga 5202192, Japan
[3] Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hosp, Dept Pharm, Higashiyama Ku, 15-749 Hommachi, Kyoto, Kyoto 6050981, Japan
[4] Ritsumeikan Univ, Coll Pharmaceut Sci, Noji Higashi 1-1-1, Kusatsu, Shiga 5258577, Japan
来源
BMC CANCER | 2018年 / 18卷
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Oral mucositis; Colorectal cancer; Panitumumab; Cetuximab; Anti-EGFR antibody; 5-fluorouracil; EPIDERMAL-GROWTH-FACTOR; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; PHARMACISTS CONTRIBUTE; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; RISK-FACTORS; OPEN-LABEL; PHASE-III; CHEMOTHERAPY; PANITUMUMAB; CETUXIMAB;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-018-4862-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis impairs the quality of life. The difference in severity of oral mucositis between different anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies combined with cytotoxic drugs in colorectal cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in oral mucositis between panitumumab (Pmab) and cetuximab (Cmab) combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study. A total of 75 colorectal cancer outpatients treated with an anti-EGFR antibody combined with FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or 5-FU/leucovorin as the first- to third-line treatment were included. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 2-3 oral mucositis. The secondary endpoint was the time to onset of oral mucositis. We also compared the incidence of toxicities of interest, skin toxicity, hypomagnesaemia and neutropenia, and time to treatment failure (TTF) between the two groups.ResultsThirty-two patients treated with Pmab and 43 patients treated with Cmab were evaluated. Patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. The incidence of grade 2-3 oral mucositis was significantly higher with Pmab than with Cmab (31.3% vs 9.3%, P<0.05). Moreover, the incidence of grade 3 oral mucositis was significantly higher in patients treated with Pmab (18.8% vs 0%, P<0.01). The mean (SD) cycles to onset of the worst oral mucositis was 3.0 (2.9) in the Pmab group and 2.3 (1.7) in the Cmab group (P=0.29). Oral mucositis was characterized by glossitis and cheilitis. The incidences of other toxicities were the following (Pmab vs Cmab): grade 2-3 skin toxicity: 68.8% vs 74.4% (P=0.61), grade 2-3 hypomagnesaemia: 9.3% vs 7.0% (P=1.00), grade 3-4 neutropenia: 28.1% vs 37.2% (P=0.46). The median TTF was not significantly different, i.e., 223days vs 200days (P=0.39) for Pmab vs Cmab.ConclusionsPmab-based chemotherapy resulted in significantly higher grades of oral mucositis compared with Cmab-based chemotherapy. The oral condition should be monitored carefully and early supportive care should be provided for patients treated with Pmab-based chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tumor budding predicts response to anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer patients
    Zlobec, Inti
    Molinari, Francesca
    Martin, Vittoria
    Mazzucchelli, Luca
    Saletti, Piercarlo
    Trezzi, Rosangela
    De Dosso, Sara
    Vlajnic, Tatjana
    Frattini, Milo
    Lugli, Alessandro
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (38) : 4823 - 4831
  • [42] CtDNA-guided rechallenge with anti-EGFR therapy in RASwt metastatic colorectal cancer: Evidence from clinical practice
    D'Onofrio, Raffaella
    Caputo, Francesco
    Prampolini, Francesco
    Spallanzani, Andrea
    Gelsomino, Fabio
    Bettelli, Stefania
    Manfredini, Samantha
    Bonetti, Luca Reggiani
    Carotenuto, Pietro
    Bocconi, Alessandro
    Dominici, Massimo
    Luppi, Gabriele
    Salati, Massimiliano
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2023, 109 (04): : 387 - 393
  • [43] MicroRNA Signature in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibodies
    Cappuzzo, Federico
    Sacconi, Andrea
    Landi, Lorenza
    Ludovini, Vienna
    Biagioni, Francesca
    D'Incecco, Armida
    Capodanno, Alessandra
    Salvini, Jessica
    Corgna, Enrichetta
    Cupini, Samanta
    Barbara, Cecilia
    Fontanini, Gabriella
    Crino, Lucio
    Blandino, Giovanni
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2014, 13 (01) : 37 - U62
  • [44] Association between EGFR gene polymorphisms, skin rash and response to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients
    Jaka, Ane
    Gutierrez-Rivera, Araika
    Ormaechea, Nerea
    Blanco, Jesus
    La Casta, Adelaida
    Sarasqueta, Cristina
    Izeta, Ander
    Tuneu, Anna
    EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 23 (10) : 751 - 753
  • [45] Unexpected insights for anti-EGFR cancer therapy
    Depeille, Philippe
    Warren, Robert S.
    Roose, Jeroen P.
    ONCOTARGET, 2015, 6 (22) : 18746 - 18747
  • [46] Mucinous Histology Is Associated with Resistance to Anti-EGFR Therapy in Patients with Left-Sided RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Wang, Chongkai
    Sandhu, Jaideep
    Fakih, Marwan
    ONCOLOGIST, 2022, 27 (02) : 104 - 109
  • [47] Markers of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer
    Shaib, Walid
    Mahajan, Reena
    El-Rayes, Bassel
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 4 (03) : 308 - 318
  • [48] Treatment of extended RAS/ BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer with anti-EGFR antibody combinations
    Voutsadakis, Ioannis A.
    PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2025, : 39 - 52
  • [49] Mechanisms of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer
    Zhao, Ben
    Wang, Lu
    Qiu, Hong
    Zhang, Mingsheng
    Sun, Li
    Peng, Ping
    Yu, Qianqian
    Yuan, Xianglin
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (03) : 3980 - 4000
  • [50] Systematic review of pharmacogenetic testing for predicting clinical benefit to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Lin, Jennifer S.
    Webber, Elizabeth M.
    Senger, Caitlyn A.
    Holmes, Rebecca S.
    Whitlock, Evelyn P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 1 (05): : 650 - U204