Oral mucositis associated with anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: single institutional retrospective cohort study

被引:14
|
作者
Dote, Satoshi [1 ,2 ]
Itakura, Shoji [3 ]
Kamei, Kohei [1 ]
Hira, Daiki [2 ,4 ]
Noda, Satoshi [2 ]
Kobayashi, Yuka [1 ]
Terada, Tomohiro [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Katsura Hosp, Dept Pharm, Nishikyo Ku, 17 Yamadahiraocho, Kyoto, Kyoto 6158256, Japan
[2] Shiga Univ Med Sci Hosp, Dept Pharm, Seta Tsukinowa Cho, Otsu, Shiga 5202192, Japan
[3] Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hosp, Dept Pharm, Higashiyama Ku, 15-749 Hommachi, Kyoto, Kyoto 6050981, Japan
[4] Ritsumeikan Univ, Coll Pharmaceut Sci, Noji Higashi 1-1-1, Kusatsu, Shiga 5258577, Japan
来源
BMC CANCER | 2018年 / 18卷
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Oral mucositis; Colorectal cancer; Panitumumab; Cetuximab; Anti-EGFR antibody; 5-fluorouracil; EPIDERMAL-GROWTH-FACTOR; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; PHARMACISTS CONTRIBUTE; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; RISK-FACTORS; OPEN-LABEL; PHASE-III; CHEMOTHERAPY; PANITUMUMAB; CETUXIMAB;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-018-4862-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis impairs the quality of life. The difference in severity of oral mucositis between different anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies combined with cytotoxic drugs in colorectal cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in oral mucositis between panitumumab (Pmab) and cetuximab (Cmab) combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study. A total of 75 colorectal cancer outpatients treated with an anti-EGFR antibody combined with FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or 5-FU/leucovorin as the first- to third-line treatment were included. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 2-3 oral mucositis. The secondary endpoint was the time to onset of oral mucositis. We also compared the incidence of toxicities of interest, skin toxicity, hypomagnesaemia and neutropenia, and time to treatment failure (TTF) between the two groups.ResultsThirty-two patients treated with Pmab and 43 patients treated with Cmab were evaluated. Patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. The incidence of grade 2-3 oral mucositis was significantly higher with Pmab than with Cmab (31.3% vs 9.3%, P<0.05). Moreover, the incidence of grade 3 oral mucositis was significantly higher in patients treated with Pmab (18.8% vs 0%, P<0.01). The mean (SD) cycles to onset of the worst oral mucositis was 3.0 (2.9) in the Pmab group and 2.3 (1.7) in the Cmab group (P=0.29). Oral mucositis was characterized by glossitis and cheilitis. The incidences of other toxicities were the following (Pmab vs Cmab): grade 2-3 skin toxicity: 68.8% vs 74.4% (P=0.61), grade 2-3 hypomagnesaemia: 9.3% vs 7.0% (P=1.00), grade 3-4 neutropenia: 28.1% vs 37.2% (P=0.46). The median TTF was not significantly different, i.e., 223days vs 200days (P=0.39) for Pmab vs Cmab.ConclusionsPmab-based chemotherapy resulted in significantly higher grades of oral mucositis compared with Cmab-based chemotherapy. The oral condition should be monitored carefully and early supportive care should be provided for patients treated with Pmab-based chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Consensus recommendations for the use of anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Cripps, C.
    Gill, S.
    Ahmed, S.
    Colwell, B.
    Dowden, S.
    Kennecke, H.
    Maroun, J.
    Samson, B.
    Thirlwell, M.
    Wong, R.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (06) : 272 - 278
  • [22] Integrating anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Haraldsdottir, Sigurdis
    Bekaii-Saab, Tanios
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 4 (03) : 285 - 298
  • [23] Anti-EGFR MoAb treatment in colorectal cancer: limitations, controversies, and contradictories
    Lei Cheng
    Wei Ren
    Li Xie
    Ming Li
    Jiang Liu
    Jing Hu
    Bao-Rui Liu
    Xiao-Ping Qian
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2014, 74 : 1 - 13
  • [24] Anti-EGFR MoAb treatment in colorectal cancer: limitations, controversies, and contradictories
    Cheng, Lei
    Ren, Wei
    Xie, Li
    Li, Ming
    Liu, Jiang
    Hu, Jing
    Liu, Bao-Rui
    Qian, Xiao-Ping
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 74 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [25] A short interval between bevacizumab and anti-epithelial growth factor receptor therapy interferes with efficacy of subsequent anti-EGFR therapy for refractory colorectal cancer
    Taniguchi, Hiroya
    Komori, Azusa
    Narita, Yukiya
    Kadowaki, Shigenori
    Ura, Takashi
    Andoh, Masashi
    Yatabe, Yasushi
    Komori, Koji
    Kimura, Kenichi
    Kinoshita, Takashi
    Muro, Kei
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 46 (03) : 228 - 233
  • [26] Anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: mechanisms and potential regimens of drug resistance
    Li, Qing-Hai
    Wang, Ying-Zhao
    Tu, Jian
    Liu, Chu-Wei
    Yuan, Yu-Jie
    Lin, Run
    He, Wei-Ling
    Cai, Shi-Rong
    He, Yu-Long
    Ye, Jin-Ning
    GASTROENTEROLOGY REPORT, 2020, 8 (03): : 179 - 191
  • [27] Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer: time for an individualized approach?
    Fakih, Marwan
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2008, 8 (09) : 1471 - 1480
  • [28] An Update on the Role of Anti-EGFR in the Treatment of Older Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Rosati, Gerardo
    Montrone, Michele
    Pacilio, Carmen
    Colombo, Alfredo
    Cicero, Giuseppe
    Paragliola, Fernando
    Vaia, Angelo
    Annunziata, Luigi
    Bilancia, Domenico
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (23)
  • [29] Anti-EGFR antibody monotherapy for colorectal cancer with severe hyperbilirubinemia: A case report
    Tsurui, Toshiaki
    Hirasawa, Yuya
    Kubota, Yutaro
    Yoshimura, Kiyoshi
    Tsunoda, Takuya
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 16 (02) : 557 - 562
  • [30] Novel approaches to treatment of advanced colorectal cancer with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies
    Zhang, Wu
    Gordon, Michael
    Lenz, Heinz-Josef
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2006, 38 (08) : 545 - 551