共 50 条
Oral mucositis associated with anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: single institutional retrospective cohort study
被引:14
|作者:
Dote, Satoshi
[1
,2
]
Itakura, Shoji
[3
]
Kamei, Kohei
[1
]
Hira, Daiki
[2
,4
]
Noda, Satoshi
[2
]
Kobayashi, Yuka
[1
]
Terada, Tomohiro
[2
]
机构:
[1] Kyoto Katsura Hosp, Dept Pharm, Nishikyo Ku, 17 Yamadahiraocho, Kyoto, Kyoto 6158256, Japan
[2] Shiga Univ Med Sci Hosp, Dept Pharm, Seta Tsukinowa Cho, Otsu, Shiga 5202192, Japan
[3] Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hosp, Dept Pharm, Higashiyama Ku, 15-749 Hommachi, Kyoto, Kyoto 6050981, Japan
[4] Ritsumeikan Univ, Coll Pharmaceut Sci, Noji Higashi 1-1-1, Kusatsu, Shiga 5258577, Japan
来源:
BMC CANCER
|
2018年
/
18卷
基金:
日本学术振兴会;
关键词:
Oral mucositis;
Colorectal cancer;
Panitumumab;
Cetuximab;
Anti-EGFR antibody;
5-fluorouracil;
EPIDERMAL-GROWTH-FACTOR;
1ST-LINE TREATMENT;
PHARMACISTS CONTRIBUTE;
MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY;
RISK-FACTORS;
OPEN-LABEL;
PHASE-III;
CHEMOTHERAPY;
PANITUMUMAB;
CETUXIMAB;
D O I:
10.1186/s12885-018-4862-z
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
BackgroundChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis impairs the quality of life. The difference in severity of oral mucositis between different anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies combined with cytotoxic drugs in colorectal cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in oral mucositis between panitumumab (Pmab) and cetuximab (Cmab) combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study. A total of 75 colorectal cancer outpatients treated with an anti-EGFR antibody combined with FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or 5-FU/leucovorin as the first- to third-line treatment were included. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 2-3 oral mucositis. The secondary endpoint was the time to onset of oral mucositis. We also compared the incidence of toxicities of interest, skin toxicity, hypomagnesaemia and neutropenia, and time to treatment failure (TTF) between the two groups.ResultsThirty-two patients treated with Pmab and 43 patients treated with Cmab were evaluated. Patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. The incidence of grade 2-3 oral mucositis was significantly higher with Pmab than with Cmab (31.3% vs 9.3%, P<0.05). Moreover, the incidence of grade 3 oral mucositis was significantly higher in patients treated with Pmab (18.8% vs 0%, P<0.01). The mean (SD) cycles to onset of the worst oral mucositis was 3.0 (2.9) in the Pmab group and 2.3 (1.7) in the Cmab group (P=0.29). Oral mucositis was characterized by glossitis and cheilitis. The incidences of other toxicities were the following (Pmab vs Cmab): grade 2-3 skin toxicity: 68.8% vs 74.4% (P=0.61), grade 2-3 hypomagnesaemia: 9.3% vs 7.0% (P=1.00), grade 3-4 neutropenia: 28.1% vs 37.2% (P=0.46). The median TTF was not significantly different, i.e., 223days vs 200days (P=0.39) for Pmab vs Cmab.ConclusionsPmab-based chemotherapy resulted in significantly higher grades of oral mucositis compared with Cmab-based chemotherapy. The oral condition should be monitored carefully and early supportive care should be provided for patients treated with Pmab-based chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文